[IANAOversight] Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] 2nd Draft of IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions published

Tue Apr 28 19:53:11 UTC 2015

Fyi

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at netnod.se> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> We would like to draw your attention to the 2nd Draft Proposal of the
> Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA Stewardship Transition
> Proposal on Naming Related Functions, which has now been published:
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en
>
> On this page, you will find the full proposal, the Chairs' Foreword
> summarising the proposal, instructions on how to provide feedback on the
> proposal, and a Public Comment Input Template. The comment period for this
> draft proposal is open until 20 May 2015.
>
> We would like to encourage anyone interested in the Names Community's
> proposal to read it and to provide feedback within the comment period.
>
> The CRISP team has started the work of conducting an analysis of the Names
> Community's proposal to identify any issues that may affect the Numbers
> Community. We hope to share this analysis with the community, once
> completed.
>
> As you are awre, the CRISP chairs have also contacted the chairs of the
> Names Community, requesting them to communicate any issues they identify in
> their proposal that might affect the Numbers Community, before the final
> submission to the ICG. (See the forwarded mail below.)
>
> We are scheduling a teleconference with the chairs of the Names Community
> to discuss this.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Izumi Okutani, CRISP chair
> Nurani Nimpuno, CRISP vice chair
>
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > Date: 24 mars 2015 09:37:35 CET
> > From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
> > To: "ianaxfer at nro.net" <ianaxfer at nro.net>
> > Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] Fwd: Request for Communication with
> CWG-Stewardship on Naming Related Functions
> >
> > FYI, based on discussions within the CRISP Team, I have made this
> request to CWG-Names chairs so we would be informed of any dicussions in
> the CWG-Names which affects the numbers community.
> > Still waiting for their response.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Izumi
> >
> >
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > Subject: Request for Communication with CWG-Stewardship on Naming
> Related Functions
> > Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:57:55 +0900
> > From: Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp>
> > To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>, Lise Fuhr <
> lise.fuhr at difo.dk>
> > CC: Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com>
> >
> > Dear Jonathan and Lise,
> >
> >
> > I am writing to you as Chair of the Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship
> Proposal (CRISP) team, responsible for preparation of the numbers
> community's response to the ICG's Request for Proposals.
> >
> > It was helpful to have the update on the CWG for Naming Related
> Functions progress at the session in Singapore, including the revised
> timeline of the process proposed by the CWG-Names, with a CWG-Names
> proposal submission in June later this year. This revised timeline
> increases the need for collaborative and constructive work in the ICG as
> well as between all three stakeholder communities to progress efficiently
> with the timeline. We remain positive that a proposal satisfactory to all
> parties, can be produced through this process.
> >
> > The ICG's decision to seek proposals from the three separate affected
> communities reflects the distinct needs, mechanisms and historical
> development of these three communities. At the same time, developing a
> proposal that satisfactorily addresses stewardship of all the IANA
> functions is a priority for all parties.
> >
> > With this in mind, I would like to request that the Chairs of the
> CWG-Names communicate directly to the Chair and Vice-Chair of the CRISP
> team, regarding any proposals or developments that might affect the numbers
> community in advance, and not wait for the final submission to the ICG.
> >
> > This level of direct communication and collaboration will allow all
> communities to consider the impact and potential compatibility issues among
> the proposals ahead of the ICG consolidation process, consult appropriately
> within their communities, and, if necessary, develop appropriate responses
> efficiently, rather than wait for inputs from the numbers community after
> the ICG consolidates proposal from all the operational communities. Such
> bottom-up consideration by all communities will be essential to the
> authority and success of any final proposal to the NTIA.
> >
> > I look forward to hearing of your continued progress, and to work
> collaboratively with you to achieve a successful outcome for all, of the
> IANA Stewardship transition.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Izumi Okutani, Alan Barrett
> > CRISP Team Chair, Vice-Chair
> > ___________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ianaxfer mailing list
> > ianaxfer at nro.net
> > https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ianaxfer mailing list
> ianaxfer at nro.net
> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/ianaoversight/attachments/20150428/23d04b34/attachment.html