[DBWG] stale route6 and domain objects for removed inet6num

[Ben Maddison]

Hi James,

On 08/25, James wrote:

> Hello Frank,

> 

> We now have the child orphan monitoring tool in place and I can confirm

> that all orphan objects have been cleaned up, now our focus turns to

> getting the bug fixes implemented asap.

> 

That is good news, thanks.

However, I'm confused about the need for a separate tool to scrub the DB
for issues like this after the fact.
Is there no referential integrity layer in the database schema itself
that can enforce these types of rule?
If there is, surely that is where this should be fixed?

Cheers,

Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/dbwg/attachments/20200825/f7c4db60/attachment.sig>