[DBWG] RIPE proposed changes to the routing registry

[Madhvi Gokool]

Hello Job

You have a valid point.

But, how can we ascertain(or rather do we  want to ascertain) that there
is consent from the ASN holder that the ASN can be used in the route(6)
object?


Regards

Madhvi

On 08/06/2018 3:35 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
> It would be my understanding that the AFRINIC IRR still is only
> available to AfriNIC members if foreign ASNs are allowed in "route:"
> objects (just like with RPKI ROAs). After all, in my example it is not
> NTT who can create or remove the route-object, but only the AfriNIC
> member can create/remove/modify the route-object.