[Community-Discuss] Share About Cloud Innovation Ltd and their business
abscoco at gmail.com
Fri Jul 30 23:42:23 UTC 2021
Dear AfriNIC's Community,
Please see my comments below, inline...
Le mercredi 28 juillet 2021, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss <
community-discuss at afrinic.net> a écrit :
> > On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:30 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via Community-Discuss <
> community-discuss at afrinic.net> wrote:
> > This will be very simple to resolve (not taking a position in one side
> or the other because I don't have all the real facts and documents).
> > The original justificacion of the request of the resources I don't think
> it had so many "secret" and "confidential" details. After several years if
> any "secrets" were there, probably aren't longer something that can't
> published now.
How come that INRs management becomes a
matter of such secrets?
Please Jordi or any other volunteer, let me know if
you are willing to contribute to draft a DPP to
remove the possibility of keeping such, apparently,
> We have already agreed that the original justification is no longer
> relevant and that, like any ISP in business for more than 8 years, things
> have changed and we have adapted.
...strange! is/was it an adaptation for the good of
the AfriNIC's service region?
Please, could you enlightenned us on those
...moving 90% of INRs out of the AfriNIC's service
region, without any Inter RIR transfer policy, seems
to be your best way to support the grow of this RIR
> > So why not CI, voluntarely publish that information? I don't have any
> stance on this game, but if I was CI, this will be the best way to probe my
> Because it is no longer relevant.
> > Otherwise, I will suggest that AFRINIC asks the court to incorporate
> that in the proceedings if is not there already, this way, whatever is the
> result of the case, everybody will know it. At least in the countries I
> know, the results of the cases are public, as well as the documents that
> were incorporated during all the process: transparency.
Jordi, maybe it's simply time to stop allowing such
In reality, even if a curative submission is required (if the last filed
> justification to which I do not have access, TBH), I would suggest they
> simply modify their justification to the following:
> We will use the addresses to number internet connected hosts on our own
> infrastructure and on our customers’ networks.
> This is a justification which meets the letter of the law of the policy
> and which does not preclude leasing.
...are you considering the notions of *conservation*
Knowing the understanding of the current
implementers of the CPM, it's clear that one shall
need to submit a convincing addressing plan
before receiving any INR allocation.
Best Regards !
baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure>
Subscribe to Mailing List: <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous
#MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement
«Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire
après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Community-Discuss