[Community-Discuss] Share About Cloud Innovation Ltd and their business
Noah
noah at neo.co.tz
Tue Jul 27 13:19:24 UTC 2021
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, 15:20 Antone Ubah, <blackboythinking at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh Noah,
>
> 'Afraid' you say? Of what? Of whom? What are my stakes? What are your
> stakes?
> There is an ongoing legal process between parties involved, am I wrong? If
> anyone or group has input to that, is it not right to funnel such down the
> appropriate channels?
>
>
> Or are you the arm behind the puppets? The grand puppeteer popping up
> characters to incite friction.🤔
>
As far as I know and for a fact, you Antony are a puppet associated with
Heng Lu.
I know this for a fact and enough data to prove it.
Whoever Lili Au is, they have the right to speak and dont call them trolls.
Noah
> Then again, what are your stakes?
>
>
> Lili is free to air his/her/their views, however it makes sense to do it
> right, not for commotion sake.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 8:00 AM Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, 14:51 Anthony Ubah, <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Didin't comms at afrinic.net already close this thread?
>>>
>>> Here's another bait email trolling the community.
>>>
>>
>> Let Lili Au speak. What are you afraid of?
>>
>> Comms dont have the authority to close any thread.
>>
>> They only cautioned on violation of CoC.
>>
>> Noah
>>
>>>
>>> *Best Regards,*
>>>
>>> *Anthony*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:45 AM Lili Au <au8692936 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A funny discussion. Anyway, I saw many LOA that is CI authorise LARUS (
>>>> a Hong Kong company too) then LARUS authorise to their clients. Leo is
>>>> correct.
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>>
>>>> > Frank Habicht <geier at geier.ne.tz>於2021年7月27日 15:32寫道:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> > did any of those make any commitment like "we are using these to
>>>> connect
>>>> > our customers in Africa" ?
>>>> >
>>>> > Did CI?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Frank
>>>> >
>>>> > PS: I count connectivity to a VM hosted by CI as ok, but not leasing
>>>> > just the IP to an entity without providing them any connectivity.
>>>> >
>>>> >> On 27/07/2021 08:24, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss wrote:
>>>> >> If you think this is a shocking amount of address space, please
>>>> consider
>>>> >> the amount of space
>>>> >> held by:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Non-LIRs (end users):
>>>> >> Hewlett Packard
>>>> >> Apple Computer
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Unclear whether to classify as LIR or not:
>>>> >> Amateur Radio (AMPR)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> LIRs:
>>>> >> XFINITY/Comcast
>>>> >> Verizon
>>>> >> Akamai
>>>> >> XO Communications
>>>> >> Amazon
>>>> >> Microsoft
>>>> >> Google
>>>> >> etc.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The equivalent of 1.5 /10s (75% of a /9) is far less than any of the
>>>> >> above organizations.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Owen
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> On Jul 26, 2021, at 01:11 , Leo S <leoso at afcast.com
>>>> >>> <mailto:leoso at afcast.com>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi Ronald
>>>> >>> Maybe your number is correct, whether it is 6.3M or 7M,This is a
>>>> >>> shocking number for everyone especially in 201x such a large block
>>>> >>> allocated. This is not in 199x year.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:25 AM Ronald F. Guilmette
>>>> >>> <rfg at tristatelogic.com <mailto:rfg at tristatelogic.com>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> In message
>>>> >>> <
>>>> CALm9Cbn+R9oen9+9YBjfbK5gGTcmEmZ1yhxgDfw04OTC3MxeZg at mail.gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:
>>>> CALm9Cbn%2BR9oen9%2B9YBjfbK5gGTcmEmZ1yhxgDfw04OTC3MxeZg at mail.gmail.com
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Meriem Dayday <meriemdayday at gmail.com
>>>> >>> <mailto:meriemdayday at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> This is a direct violation of the CoC.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> No, actually, it isn't.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The information about how Cloud Innovation is presently making
>>>> use of
>>>> >>> it's assigned 6,291,456 AFRINIC-administered IPv4 addresses is
>>>> >>> effectively
>>>> >>> public information, and it is not difficult to derive from any
>>>> >>> number of
>>>> >>> public sources (e.g. RIPEStat, bgp.he.net <http://bgp.he.net/>,
>>>> etc.)
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If you lived in the time of Galileo Galilei, would you consider
>>>> it an
>>>> >>> affront to public decency if some people elected to look through
>>>> the
>>>> >>> telescope and then just describe what they saw? And if so, then
>>>> what
>>>> >>> is next? Book burning?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> Disclosing such information and data without the company's
>>>> >>> consent is a
>>>> >>>> clear attempt of defamation and can have legal consequences on the
>>>> >>>> concerned person.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> OK, let's parse that statement, because it conjoins two different
>>>> >>> obvious
>>>> >>> logical problems.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> First, the Internet is *not* a private network. Fact's about
>>>> what
>>>> >>> various
>>>> >>> companies are doing on the Internet are possible to see, and to
>>>> learn,
>>>> >>> without needing the consent of the companies inolved. That is
>>>> the
>>>> >>> nature
>>>> >>> of the Internet. If you want to run your own closed private
>>>> intranet,
>>>> >>> then go head. Nobody will stop you and you can then keep every
>>>> last
>>>> >>> detail of your corporate operations utterly secret. But the
>>>> >>> minute any
>>>> >>> company obtains Internet number resources and starts using
>>>> those, it
>>>> >>> *voluntarily* gives up some of its corporate secrecy in exchange
>>>> >>> for being
>>>> >>> a part of, and a participant on this great communications
>>>> >>> experiment we
>>>> >>> call the Internet.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I personally am not now, and never have been a customer of Cloud
>>>> >>> Innovation.
>>>> >>> And yet even well before today I already determined for myself
>>>> >>> that well
>>>> >>> more that 90% of Cloud Innovation's assigned
>>>> AFRINIC-administered IPv4
>>>> >>> address space was being deployed to other continents. This is
>>>> not
>>>> >>> a state
>>>> >>> secret by any means, and the information may be derived from 100%
>>>> >>> public
>>>> >>> sources. Anyone clever enough to seek it out will find the same
>>>> >>> information.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Whether the manner in which Cloud Innovation is using/deploying
>>>> its
>>>> >>> assigned number resources does or does not comport with its
>>>> specific
>>>> >>> RSA and/or with community approved regulations is a separate
>>>> question,
>>>> >>> and one which I myself do not have an answer to. In any case,
>>>> the
>>>> >>> courts will sort out those questions in due course, I imagine.
>>>> >>> But the
>>>> >>> mere facts of how Cloud Innovation has deployed its
>>>> AFRINIC-assigned
>>>> >>> resources, or how it would appear to make money, based on the
>>>> >>> available
>>>> >>> public evidence, are *not* corporate secrets. Any attempt to
>>>> portray
>>>> >>> them as such is just an attempt at heavy-handed censorship.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The second logical problem with the statement above is contained
>>>> >>> in the
>>>> >>> part that says "... attempt of defamation and can have legal
>>>> >>> consequences
>>>> >>> on the concerned person."
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Exactly so! If the guy who posted the material you are reacting
>>>> >>> to was
>>>> >>> willing to take the legal risk to post that material, IN SPITE
>>>> OF the
>>>> >>> possibility that he could, at least in theory, be sued for
>>>> defamation,
>>>> >>> then why are YOU worried about it? Why should AFRINIC be worried
>>>> >>> about
>>>> >>> it? Obviously, this (theoretical) possibility of a defemation
>>>> lawsuit
>>>> >>> is only a problem for the guy who posted the (allegedly)
>>>> defamatory
>>>> >>> text, and he obviiously was willing to take the risk in order to
>>>> >>> express
>>>> >>> his opinion, SO WHAT IS THAT TO YOU?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Here again, shouting down in the original poster in this manner
>>>> >>> appears
>>>> >>> to me to be just another a heavy-handed attempt at pointless
>>>> >>> censorship.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I hope that we here can all have open and frank discusions of all
>>>> >>> of the
>>>> >>> issues now of concern to AFRINIC without these kinds of attempts
>>>> to
>>>> >>> muzzle dissenting viewpoints based on perfectly silly arguments.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Regards,
>>>> >>> rfg
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>>> >>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net <mailto:
>>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net>
>>>> >>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>>> >>> <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>>> >>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net <mailto:Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>>> >
>>>> >>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>>> >> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>>> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Community-Discuss mailing list
>>>> > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20210727/e3434d28/attachment.html>
More information about the Community-Discuss
mailing list