[Community-Discuss] Share About Cloud Innovation Ltd and their business

Noah noah at neo.co.tz
Tue Jul 27 13:19:24 UTC 2021


On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, 15:20 Antone Ubah, <blackboythinking at gmail.com> wrote:


> Oh Noah,

>

> 'Afraid' you say? Of what? Of whom? What are my stakes? What are your

> stakes?

> There is an ongoing legal process between parties involved, am I wrong? If

> anyone or group has input to that, is it not right to funnel such down the

> appropriate channels?

>

>

> Or are you the arm behind the puppets? The grand puppeteer popping up

> characters to incite friction.🤔

>



As far as I know and for a fact, you Antony are a puppet associated with
Heng Lu.

I know this for a fact and enough data to prove it.

Whoever Lili Au is, they have the right to speak and dont call them trolls.

Noah




> Then again, what are your stakes?

>

>

> Lili is free to air his/her/their views, however it makes sense to do it

> right, not for commotion sake.

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Anthony

>

> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 8:00 AM Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

>

>>

>>

>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, 14:51 Anthony Ubah, <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com> wrote:

>>

>>> Didin't comms at afrinic.net already close this thread?

>>>

>>> Here's another bait email trolling the community.

>>>

>>

>> Let Lili Au speak. What are you afraid of?

>>

>> Comms dont have the authority to close any thread.

>>

>> They only cautioned on violation of CoC.

>>

>> Noah

>>

>>>

>>> *Best Regards,*

>>>

>>> *Anthony*

>>>

>>>

>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:45 AM Lili Au <au8692936 at gmail.com> wrote:

>>>

>>>> A funny discussion. Anyway, I saw many LOA that is CI authorise LARUS (

>>>> a Hong Kong company too) then LARUS authorise to their clients. Leo is

>>>> correct.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> > Frank Habicht <geier at geier.ne.tz>於2021年7月27日 15:32寫道:

>>>> >

>>>> > Hi,

>>>> >

>>>> > did any of those make any commitment like "we are using these to

>>>> connect

>>>> > our customers in Africa" ?

>>>> >

>>>> > Did CI?

>>>> >

>>>> > Thanks,

>>>> > Frank

>>>> >

>>>> > PS: I count connectivity to a VM hosted by CI as ok, but not leasing

>>>> > just the IP to an entity without providing them any connectivity.

>>>> >

>>>> >> On 27/07/2021 08:24, Owen DeLong via Community-Discuss wrote:

>>>> >> If you think this is a shocking amount of address space, please

>>>> consider

>>>> >> the amount of space

>>>> >> held by:

>>>> >>

>>>> >> Non-LIRs (end users):

>>>> >> Hewlett Packard

>>>> >> Apple Computer

>>>> >>

>>>> >> Unclear whether to classify as LIR or not:

>>>> >> Amateur Radio (AMPR)

>>>> >>

>>>> >> LIRs:

>>>> >> XFINITY/Comcast

>>>> >> Verizon

>>>> >> Akamai

>>>> >> XO Communications

>>>> >> Amazon

>>>> >> Microsoft

>>>> >> Google

>>>> >> etc.

>>>> >>

>>>> >> The equivalent of 1.5 /10s (75% of a /9) is far less than any of the

>>>> >> above organizations.

>>>> >>

>>>> >> Owen

>>>> >>

>>>> >>

>>>> >>> On Jul 26, 2021, at 01:11 , Leo S <leoso at afcast.com

>>>> >>> <mailto:leoso at afcast.com>> wrote:

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> Hi Ronald

>>>> >>> Maybe your number is correct, whether it is 6.3M or 7M,This is a

>>>> >>> shocking number for everyone especially in 201x such a large block

>>>> >>> allocated. This is not in 199x year.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:25 AM Ronald F. Guilmette

>>>> >>> <rfg at tristatelogic.com <mailto:rfg at tristatelogic.com>> wrote:

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> In message

>>>> >>> <

>>>> CALm9Cbn+R9oen9+9YBjfbK5gGTcmEmZ1yhxgDfw04OTC3MxeZg at mail.gmail.com

>>>> <mailto:

>>>> CALm9Cbn%2BR9oen9%2B9YBjfbK5gGTcmEmZ1yhxgDfw04OTC3MxeZg at mail.gmail.com

>>>> >>

>>>> >>> Meriem Dayday <meriemdayday at gmail.com

>>>> >>> <mailto:meriemdayday at gmail.com>> wrote:

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>>> This is a direct violation of the CoC.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> No, actually, it isn't.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> The information about how Cloud Innovation is presently making

>>>> use of

>>>> >>> it's assigned 6,291,456 AFRINIC-administered IPv4 addresses is

>>>> >>> effectively

>>>> >>> public information, and it is not difficult to derive from any

>>>> >>> number of

>>>> >>> public sources (e.g. RIPEStat, bgp.he.net <http://bgp.he.net/>,

>>>> etc.)

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> If you lived in the time of Galileo Galilei, would you consider

>>>> it an

>>>> >>> affront to public decency if some people elected to look through

>>>> the

>>>> >>> telescope and then just describe what they saw? And if so, then

>>>> what

>>>> >>> is next? Book burning?

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>>> Disclosing such information and data without the company's

>>>> >>> consent is a

>>>> >>>> clear attempt of defamation and can have legal consequences on the

>>>> >>>> concerned person.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> OK, let's parse that statement, because it conjoins two different

>>>> >>> obvious

>>>> >>> logical problems.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> First, the Internet is *not* a private network. Fact's about

>>>> what

>>>> >>> various

>>>> >>> companies are doing on the Internet are possible to see, and to

>>>> learn,

>>>> >>> without needing the consent of the companies inolved. That is

>>>> the

>>>> >>> nature

>>>> >>> of the Internet. If you want to run your own closed private

>>>> intranet,

>>>> >>> then go head. Nobody will stop you and you can then keep every

>>>> last

>>>> >>> detail of your corporate operations utterly secret. But the

>>>> >>> minute any

>>>> >>> company obtains Internet number resources and starts using

>>>> those, it

>>>> >>> *voluntarily* gives up some of its corporate secrecy in exchange

>>>> >>> for being

>>>> >>> a part of, and a participant on this great communications

>>>> >>> experiment we

>>>> >>> call the Internet.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> I personally am not now, and never have been a customer of Cloud

>>>> >>> Innovation.

>>>> >>> And yet even well before today I already determined for myself

>>>> >>> that well

>>>> >>> more that 90% of Cloud Innovation's assigned

>>>> AFRINIC-administered IPv4

>>>> >>> address space was being deployed to other continents. This is

>>>> not

>>>> >>> a state

>>>> >>> secret by any means, and the information may be derived from 100%

>>>> >>> public

>>>> >>> sources. Anyone clever enough to seek it out will find the same

>>>> >>> information.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> Whether the manner in which Cloud Innovation is using/deploying

>>>> its

>>>> >>> assigned number resources does or does not comport with its

>>>> specific

>>>> >>> RSA and/or with community approved regulations is a separate

>>>> question,

>>>> >>> and one which I myself do not have an answer to. In any case,

>>>> the

>>>> >>> courts will sort out those questions in due course, I imagine.

>>>> >>> But the

>>>> >>> mere facts of how Cloud Innovation has deployed its

>>>> AFRINIC-assigned

>>>> >>> resources, or how it would appear to make money, based on the

>>>> >>> available

>>>> >>> public evidence, are *not* corporate secrets. Any attempt to

>>>> portray

>>>> >>> them as such is just an attempt at heavy-handed censorship.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> The second logical problem with the statement above is contained

>>>> >>> in the

>>>> >>> part that says "... attempt of defamation and can have legal

>>>> >>> consequences

>>>> >>> on the concerned person."

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> Exactly so! If the guy who posted the material you are reacting

>>>> >>> to was

>>>> >>> willing to take the legal risk to post that material, IN SPITE

>>>> OF the

>>>> >>> possibility that he could, at least in theory, be sued for

>>>> defamation,

>>>> >>> then why are YOU worried about it? Why should AFRINIC be worried

>>>> >>> about

>>>> >>> it? Obviously, this (theoretical) possibility of a defemation

>>>> lawsuit

>>>> >>> is only a problem for the guy who posted the (allegedly)

>>>> defamatory

>>>> >>> text, and he obviiously was willing to take the risk in order to

>>>> >>> express

>>>> >>> his opinion, SO WHAT IS THAT TO YOU?

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> Here again, shouting down in the original poster in this manner

>>>> >>> appears

>>>> >>> to me to be just another a heavy-handed attempt at pointless

>>>> >>> censorship.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> I hope that we here can all have open and frank discusions of all

>>>> >>> of the

>>>> >>> issues now of concern to AFRINIC without these kinds of attempts

>>>> to

>>>> >>> muzzle dissenting viewpoints based on perfectly silly arguments.

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> Regards,

>>>> >>> rfg

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> _______________________________________________

>>>> >>> Community-Discuss mailing list

>>>> >>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net <mailto:

>>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net>

>>>> >>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>>>> >>> <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss>

>>>> >>>

>>>> >>> _______________________________________________

>>>> >>> Community-Discuss mailing list

>>>> >>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net <mailto:Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

>>>> >

>>>> >>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>>>> >>

>>>> >>

>>>> >> _______________________________________________

>>>> >> Community-Discuss mailing list

>>>> >> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

>>>> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>>>> >>

>>>> >

>>>> > _______________________________________________

>>>> > Community-Discuss mailing list

>>>> > Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

>>>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>>>>

>>>> _______________________________________________

>>>> Community-Discuss mailing list

>>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>>>>

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> Community-Discuss mailing list

>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Community-Discuss mailing list

>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

>>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20210727/e3434d28/attachment.html>


More information about the Community-Discuss mailing list