[Community-Discuss] [rpd] Cloud Innovation Displays Very Poor, If Not Criminal, Netizenship

[ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE]

Hi Apologies,
My last email was meant for the RPD mailing list and not the general
discussion
Cheers

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:48 PM ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE <
oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng> wrote:


> Dear Community,

> You would notice that we Co-chairs decided to back off when the direction

> of discussion moved towards proposing a policy. However, it seems we are

> deviating again.  This mailing list or PDWG has no power to determine who

> is to right or wrong on this issue and therefore posting issues on who to

> blame or not on here is a total distraction, a waste of time and should be

> considered as spam. There are other mailing lists where the blame game can

> be discussed.   At this point, we would like to issue a final warning *specifically

> for the blame thing (directly or indirectly) or mentioning the names of any

> individual or a company*. We do not mind having the discussion around

> policies in a constructive manner but definitely without names or an

> individual or a company.   Am sorry to say but we have no choice *but to

> moderate the email of anyone doing otherwise after this email*.

> Thank you

> Co-Chair

> PDWG

>

> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:35 AM Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

>

>> Paul,

>>

>> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 6:22 AM Paul Wollner <paulw at wollner.za.net>

>> wrote:

>>

>>

>>> I feel that SEACOM neglected their duty to remove these objects when the

>>> client's contract came to an end. As the ISP created the records in the

>>> first place, the records should have been updated or deleted by them too.

>>>

>>

>> From the data posted by Arnaud and Owen, the route object records for the

>> Cloud Innovation Limited prefix156.241.3.0/24 in question are those created

>> as recently as 4th March 2020 by Mattew Chan of HonKong Link Infinity

>> Limited on the RADB IRR database using AS37353 again to originate the

>> prefix.

>>

>> Surely, this does not look like a mistake if indeed the contract with the

>> customer was terminated as far back as December 2020.

>>

>>

>> [image: link infinity.png]

>>

>> The route object as seen on the data presented by Arnaud and Owen has a

>> change log that indicates " *changed: matthew.chan at hgc.com.hk

>> <matthew.chan at hgc.com.hk> 20200304*"

>> which means it was created on 04-03-2020 two months since December 2019.

>>

>> I believe Owen has indicated that he is following up the matter with

>> their customer so that it's fixed and those records cleared from RADB.

>>

>> Cheers,

>> Noah

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

>


-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20200529/94dd4b96/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: link infinity.png
Type: image/png
Size: 327990 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20200529/94dd4b96/attachment-0001.png>