[Community-Discuss] Gratitude

[Noah]

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:27 Mike Silber, <silber.mike at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ish
>
> > On 11 Jun 2019, at 14:08, Ish Sookun <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Right. I will seek the advice of the Data Protection Office on this
> matter.
> >
> I look forward to their response.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I quote from
> https://afrinic.net/ast/pdf/2019-minutes/20190305-minutes.pdf
> >
> >  « SM recalled that the Board collectively agreed to take the AGMM
> >    matter to Court and there was no decision about disclosing the
> >    personal data to the community. It was just a matter of when to
> >    disclose the information and what to disclose. It is not because
> >    the document is public, that we can disclose to the public mailing
> >    list. »
> >
> > Am I reading the wrong or inaccurate minutes?
>
> You will note reference in the quote above to "personal data” and then
> “information” and then the fact that “the document is public”. The minutes
> do not indicate the difference between these terms and are imprecise.
>
> For that reason I questioned whether they are perhaps inaccurate. Are you
> able to surmise a logical reading of the above? In which case - please
> share it and the basis on which you draw such conclusion.
>


There is precedence for redacting public documents for various reasons
before publishing them. In this case, there seemed to be a concern of data
protection in light of the local data protection laws.

Cheers
Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20190611/cbac42f1/attachment.html>