[Community-Discuss] [rpd] Lobbying Allegations against Wafa Dahmani

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Hi Arnaud,

 

I’m very happy that you send this email, because it addresses what I’m saying. Note that I was not aware of that before, but looks good to me (I look to the email on 6th of June), the other one is just congratulating about the results.

 

It is a public email, not private, even anyone can subscribe to that mailing list and look at the archives.
It is in the scope being a NOG, where all the participants may have a voice about how they want to drive Afrinic.
It is imploring for voting and is informing that there are two candidates from Nigeria and suggesting they are good candidates.
Dewole doesn’t mention anything about his position as co-chair, so it is an open and transparent (no confusion possible) message.
 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 4/7/19 9:08, "Arnaud AMELINA" <amelnaud at gmail.com> escribió:

 

Hi, community and PWG members

 

I noticed that lobbying for votes for afrinic BoD is being used to divert attention  from serious issue raised by WAFA.  Enough has been said, but  I wonder if I should condemn  Dewole, Afrinic pdp  cochair,  campaign  for board candidates, using national NOG  list and turning AFRINIC board election  to nationalism. (*l) 

let be serious, show maturity and address real issues.

 

 

(*) http://abuja.forum.org.ng/pipermail/ngnog-discuss/2019-June/005259.html

 

Arnaud

 

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019, 07:30 Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com> wrote:

Badru,

Yet again – you have not read my emails.

I fully the support the right to lobby in public forms

I fully support the right of any individual to have their say

I fully support the right of any member to change the rules using due process as defined

I have said this, over and over again.  I have also been very blunt about the fact that yes, I have lobbied, and I make no apology for that because I believe that the right to lobby in the pursuit of ones goals, and I believe that essentially, elections are political processes and democratic in nature, and democracy doesn’t work without that aspect of it.

However, what I fundamentally disagree with – is misrepresentation of who we represent – something I have never done – and I fundamentally disagree with people who are in a directly conflicted position taking a stand which deepens that conflict, especially when the neutrality directly relates to things that affect this community.

I will quote from one of the emails I sent – which was to an email list containing many members:

I will quote from two separate emails that I have sent over the years to lobby in previous elections – these were sent to email lists that were not AfriNIC – they were not sent to individuals unsolicited – and there are many on this list who can attest to the accuracy of these emails.

Email 1:

I am not going to tell any of you how to vote – What I tell you above is my perspective, and yes, its biased towards what I have seen and how well I know the candidates.  What I will say however, is that it is absolutely critical that the South African members get online and vote – or show up at the meeting and vote – or send proxies – whichever – but have your voice heard.  As we move into a time when v4 is running out (AfriNIC is into its final /8), and when we move into an environment where so much is changing with that runout – and particularly when we have managed to turn an organization around – we need to ensure that we have strong candidates that represent the community and can keep the organization alive.  Because without AfriNIC – without a registry – we end up in trouble – and no one really wants the alternative scenarios.

So what I will ask is, look at the candidates, consider them not from a geo-political perspective, not from a linguistic perspective, but consider them on the merits and what they have achieved – and then vote as you feel.  Their CV’s are all online.

Email 2:

As such, for those of you who are opting to issue proxies and wish to issue proxies to myself or via myself, this is how I will be voting.  Those of you who are voting electronically, I encourage you when the slate comes out to study each and every candidate – but I am confident that what I have said above will ring true, and I ask every member of this list to get out there and use your vote, either for one of these candidates or otherwise one of the others when the slate comes out – but please, make sure you vote, either via proxy or via online or in person.  I cannot stress how many critical issues are going to come up in the next year or two, and without a strong and independent board we could face serious issues.

Both emails quote above are a matter of record for the world to see – and here is the major difference – a.) No where do I misrepresent who I am speaking for b.) I explicitly state – these are MY views, accept them or reject them, but – please vote – because its important to have your voice heard.  Had Wafa sent an email saying “Hi, I’m Wafa, and these are my specific views on each candidate, and this is why I will be voting the way that I am, and if you like these choices, feel free to vote with me, but if you don’t, still have your say in the way you see fit”, I would be here, backing her to the hilt – however, what I saw was a.) a misrepresentation by implication of who was represented and b.) a blatant display lacking of neutrality from the chair of the appeals committee – particularly in light of the PDP and the position of co-chair – and I believe that brings the integrity and neutrality of said appeals committee into question when it is critical that trust in that committee remains high, which is why I agree with Sander when he called for her to step down to maintain the integrity of the appeals process.

So – I see no inconsistency with what I have said in the last 48 hours or what I have said, or done, over the years.  What I do see from you – yet again – is a highly selective reading of what I have said for your own purposes.

 

Andrew

 

 

 

 

From: Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com> 
Sent: Thursday, 4 July 2019 07:03
To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>; wafa DAHMANI <wafa at ati.tn>; Paschal Ochang <pascosoft at gmail.com>
Cc: community-discuss <community-discuss at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [rpd] Lobbying Allegations against Wafa Dahmani

 

Andrew

The archives of a number of mailing lists you belong to have many similar emails authored by you prior to elections.  We have also seen emails by you asking an entire community of ISPA not once but a number of times to act in a particular way.

Supporting a particular slate of candidates is not new in AfriNIC nor is it new any election.

And when you talk about neutrality ???  its like the Kettle calling the Pot Black.

Anyone in our bottom up position is free to lobby for a particular outcome.  

As a board member you also lobbied and also ferried people to AGMM’s to strengthen your number of positions.  (you have denied this many times so lets call it a standing allegation)

The AfriNIC membership  time and time have shown their ability to make up their minds in elections after listening to many different views either shared on the floor by candidates, in the corridors by supporters on through email.  

I see nothing wrong here at the moment.  

However, if the community thinks that something has to change we also have mechanisms in place to make the necessary changes to course correct.  

Regards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 at 8:16 PM
To: wafa DAHMANI <wafa at ati.tn>, Paschal Ochang <pascosoft at gmail.com>
Cc: community-discuss <community-discuss at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [rpd] Lobbying Allegations against Wafa Dahmani

 

Wafa,

While I agree you have the right to campaign for anyone you so please – and I believe that is very much the case –

 

a.)    Your email was read as an implication that the ASO was supporting said candidates – which I don’t think anyone believes – and the question has been asked in multiple regions to clarify this

b.)    As a member of the appeal committee – you have to maintain a position of total neutrality – this email clearly demonstrates that you are in no way neutral on issues inside the PDP – since it advocates for the election of co-chairs with no reasons given why – and requests immediate mobilization to meet “our strategy”.  This email casts serious aspersions on the neutrality of the appeals committee.

Furthermore – can you please clarify to this list – what exactly is this strategy and who owns this strategy – you email in this regard was explicit – there is a strategy – it is held by multiple individuals outside of the purview of the general community – and it concerns the placement of members of the board and the PDP – and I think it is only fair that if lobbying is being done – it is transparent and open – and as such – I would like to know what this strategy is and where it comes from.

This email however, was entirely and totally unacceptable in my eyes – NOT because you lobbied – I believe as I have said many times that this is your right.  It is unacceptable because it implies positions on behalf of other groups who I for one do not believe share that position, it is unacceptable because it is a clear indication of lack of neutrality in a context where neutrality is required, and coming on the heels of what I view as a blatant and unfounded attack on a non-profit foundation – well – it really highlights certain things.

So again – myself, and I am sure others, would like to know about this strategy and who “our” is in the context of ths.

 

Thanks

 

Andrew 

 

 

From: wafa DAHMANI <wafa at ati.tn>
Date: Wednesday, 3 July 2019 at 18:50
To: Paschal Ochang <pascosoft at gmail.com>
Cc: community-discuss <community-discuss at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [rpd] Lobbying Allegations against Wafa Dahmani

 

Hello All,

 

I can campaign for anyone and its perfectly normal and I was speaking in my personal behalf. 

 

I understand that my salutations can be confusing, but I sent this email in my personal capacity. 

 

Being a volunteer at ASO - AC does not strip me off my rights to my personal opinions nor does it mean I can not campaign for my preferred candidates.

 

In anycase, the ASO - AC has its own procedures and communication channels.

 

 

Wafa Dahmani

 

Member AFRINIC Appeal Committee

Global IGF MAG member

ASO / AC excom member

 

De: "Paschal Ochang" <pascosoft at gmail.com>
À: "community-discuss" <community-discuss at afrinic.net>, "rpd" <rpd at afrinic.net>
Envoyé: Mercredi 3 Juillet 2019 16:09:18
Objet: [rpd] Lobbying Allegations against Wafa Dahmani

 

Hello all, this was posted under the thread of allegations against Larus Foundation so I did the honors of opening it as separate thread so that this two issues can be dealt with separately. This was posted as an allegation towards Wafa and the mail displays a act of lobbying. Can this honorable community be clarified on this allegations please. 

 

Dear,

 

 My name is Wafa Dahmani from Tunisia, an active member of the African community and more specifically AFRINIC: member of the appeal committee; ASO / AC excom member and Ex Chair of Governance Committee '(GC) at AFRINIC.

I contact you to solicit your votes for the following candidates:

 

Board of Directors:

North Africa (seat 1)

 

Habin Youssef

West Africa (seat 2)

 

Ly Ousmane

 

South Africa (seat 5)

 

Mpisane Vika William

 

East Africa (seat 6)

 

Nkusi Robert Ford

 

Non-regional (seat 7)

 

Eshun Benjamin Adzenyamebeye

 

 

 

Election Number Resource Organization Number Council

 

Mustapha Ben Jemaa

 

Election Policy Development Working Group

 

Komi Elitcha

Sami Hassan

 

Election Governance Committee

 

Daniel Nanghaka

Ladies and Gentlemen, in the context of our strategy  and in order to preserve AFRINIC's interests for Africa and to be able to choose the right candidates for North Africa in the long term, it is desirable to join all our efforts and vote for these candidates who presents the best choice for an adequate board

 

the de facto vote online through your interface with AFRINIC is very simple for all categories except the policy development Working group where we want you to mobilize your teams on the spot to vote for our candidates

We strongly solicit your support

 

Thank you

 

Wafa Dahmani

 

member AFRINIC Appeal Committee

Global IGF MAG member

ASO / AC excom member

 

 


_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20190704/9698f5bf/attachment-0001.html>