[Community-Discuss] Larus foundation fellowship

[Sander Steffann]

Hi,


> I agree with your if we mean summary of the discussion, but actually I was meaning summary of the proposal, which in fact is already requested in the proposal forms and is already done by authors. Sometimes that's more a single paragraph, so in those cases I think it should be up to the authors to prepare it.


I'm not sure that such a proposal summary would be useful. Newcomers can read those from the proposals themselves. The difficult thing to learn is how the proposal's potential impact is perceived and discussed. That part can take up much time, and that is where I see the usefulness of a neutral summary.

Cheers,
Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20190703/a4777d21/attachment.sig>