[Community-Discuss] More meeting questions

Tue May 8 06:47:27 UTC 2018

Dear M. Andrew,

Urgence is not determine by the incessant SHRIEKING from you

Since your grievance is member matter, please direct this to member list.
Some of us a getting TIRED of you abusing us with these DARK world of DOOM
where everything that you do not like or support is going to kill out
children.

I was hope that the fact that you have to reply to your own email 4 times
would give you a hint, but no.

Since there is NO HOPE that you

I.  Will understand that you have also become as BAD for this community as
you think the board is
II.  Will listen to any advice that doesn't come from yourself or an
android that you created in your image

Then maybe you should call your lawyers to tell the Senegalaise police to
go and stop this stupid, illegal meeting where the 'illuminati' (---of
which you were member until recently) are planning to kill african children
and women and sale their men into slavery again.

2018-05-07 9:28 GMT+00:00 Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>:

> Dear Board,
>
>
>
> You have a member that is (legitimately) protesting your notice of meeting
> – we are now only days away from said meeting – and there are still members
> who may be reading to travel to a meeting that may not end up occurring –
> since it occurring would be contrary to the bylaws and the companies act.
>
>
>
> Can we please get a response to this – it is a matter of urgency
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Alston
> *Sent:* 06 May 2018 17:16
> *To:* 'Andrew Alston' <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>; AFRINIC Board of
> Directors' List <Board at afrinic.net>; members-discuss at afrinic.net;
> community-discuss at afrinic.net
> *Subject:* RE: More meeting questions
>
>
>
> A few more notes about the contestation of the notice of meeting.
>
>
>
> I want to talk to the issue of precedent – because I have a fear that some
> may attempt to argue – without legal basis – that there is precedent found
> in the fact that the notice of meeting in the past did not contain similar
> information and the meeting went ahead.
>
>
>
> To address this – I wish to bring the communities attention to article
> 12.3 of the bylaws:
>
>
>
> 12.3 Any irregularity in a notice of an Annual General Member Meeting
> shall be waived where all the members entitled to attend and vote at the
> Annual General Members' Meeting attend the said Meeting without protest as
> to the irregularity, or where all members agree to the waiver.
>
>
>
> The critical part of this is that up until now no member entitled to
> attend and vote have protested the irregularity – therefore – past meetings
> were entirely valid.  However, that is no longer the case – as a member – I
> am entitled to attend the meeting – and I am formally protesting the
> irregularities in the notice of meeting – as such – the issue of precedent
> is a moot point.
>
>
>
> I also need to bring the communities attention to the fact that this
> action is not without precedent in the internet community.  A very similar
> situation occurred with a late notice of meeting with the AMS-IX exchange
> in around 2004 or 2005 I believe – and the board of AMS-IX did withdraw the
> meeting notice and reschedule – as they were legally required to do.
>
>
>
> The records of this should still be on the AMS-IX mailing lists for those
> of you who are members of AMS-IX.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Alston [mailto:Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
> <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>]
> *Sent:* 05 May 2018 20:42
> *To:* AFRINIC Board of Directors' List <Board at afrinic.net>;
> members-discuss at afrinic.net; community-discuss at afrinic.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Community-Discuss] More meeting questions
>
>
>
> Just to point out – that because clause 12.2.(d) explicitly refers to
> members – the argument as regards registered members and waiver is actually
> mute – because of the lack of information and the requirements for a valid
> meeting notice not being met – a waiver is required from **every** member
> – or in the alternative – every member participating in the meeting (and
> that includes online participation) without any protest as to the notice of
> meeting being invalid
>
>
>
> Effectively – the board requires a unanimous resolution from the floor
> that includes online participants in the meeting that waives the flaws in
> the notice of meeting – not a majority – not a super majority – unanimous
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Alston
> *Sent:* 05 May 2018 17:52
> *To:* AFRINIC Board of Directors' List <Board at afrinic.net>;
> members-discuss at afrinic.net; community-discuss at afrinic.net
> *Subject:* More meeting questions
>
>
>
> Dear Board of Directors.
>
>
>
> The fifth schedule of the companies act, section 2, sub-paragraph (b)(i)
> states:
>
>
>
> (b) The notice shall state –
>
> (i) the nature of the business to be transacted at the meeting in
> sufficient detail to enable a shareholder to form a reasoned judgment in
> relation to it; and
>
>
>
> It further goes on to state in section 2(f) that clause 2(b) stand
> irrespective of the bylaws or constitution of the company.
>
>
>
> The notice distributed for this meeting does not contain sufficient detail
> for any member to make reasoned judgement – there is:
>
>
>
>    1. No Audit report as supplied by the Audit Committee attached
>    2. There is no detail as regards the appointment of the auditor
>    3. The proposed fee structure as detailed in referenced in section 5.4
>    of the meeting notice contains no detail
>    4. The proposed budget was not distributed by the meeting notice (as
>    referenced by section 5.3 of the meeting agenda)
>    5. There is nomcom report attached the meeting agenda
>
>
>
> As such – this notice of meeting is invalid as per the companies act and
> as per section 12.2.(d) of the companies bylaws.
>
>
>
> As such – you require the waiver of every participating member to continue
> with this meeting – anything else – and the meeting is simply not valid.
> Unless of course the board wishes to play the registered members card and
> once again prove to this membership base that they are not considered full
> members of this organisation as has been the claim for years.  If this
> board wishes to make this claim – please state so explicitly – if not –
> please inform this community as to how you will go about seeking the waiver
> as is required by the companies act.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
>

-- 
Borg le Chevalier
___________________________________
"Common sense is what tells us the world is flat"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20180508/1babe9e3/attachment.html>