[Community-Discuss] Issue with non-AFRINIC Fellowship to Meeting -

[Jackson Muthili]

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 12:14 AM Boubakar Barry <boubakarbarry at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:56 PM Jackson Muthili <jacksonmuthi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 11:38 PM Benjamin Eshun
>> <benjamin.eshun at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Jackson,
>> >
>> > Just a simple question.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 11:16 AM Jackson Muthili <jacksonmuthi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > A policy that incites or stimulates divisiveness, targeting and
>> > > victimizing is very, very bad.
>> >
>> > How does a proposed policy that gives guidelines to AFRINIC to carry
>> > out audit and review of INR that it already has the mandate to carry
>> > out “very very bad”?
>>
>> It has produced a very unhealthy discussion climate full of name
>> calling, personal attacks, racist connotation to name but a few.
>
> Created by whom? I don't support any personal attack, not even thinking of supporting racial ones. This has no place in this community.
>
> However, shall we keep quite and see how Africa is ripped off its resources just because some are shouting that this is discriminatory, etc.?
>
> The way I see some of the contributions here is that AFRINIC staff doesn't have the competency and integrity to carry out reviews on the use of resources.
>
> Resources are given out for the advancement of the Internet and for socio-economic development in Africa. So, why oppose checks for the custodians of the IP resources allocated to Africa to check that these are used for the purpose they have been allocated to us?

clearly nobody is against the general idea of the custodians of the IP
resources allocated to Africa to check that these are used for the
purpose they have been allocated to us as you put it.

it is the how.

for as long as the proposed process is prone to abuse, sorry it cant fly.

by the way, is there anything stopping AfriNIC to carry out audit as
allowed through registration service agreement (rsa)? if no, why are
we even having this discussion??

J






>
> Boubakar
>
>> For
>> me this is very bad. It means there are underlying principles in this
>> proposal that have not been properly written nor their ramifications
>> properly explained.
>>
>> J
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss