[Community-Discuss] Controversial anti-shutdown policy discussed at RIPE

Sat May 13 21:27:00 UTC 2017

Brother Owen

How are you. So i dont understand how you ask me in the email but i shall
tell you one important recommendations.

Only the multistake holders  process which is been for long long time like
ISOC leslie said is what is beeen working.

Do you know all places where government shutdown the internet..the our
people there are having internet today and using it.

Now do you know how this happen..Because the people talked in engaging the
government and other people from world also requested and after chaos or
reasons for shutdown was resolved... the internet is back on.

So was there this so called antishuting down police. No no no it was not
there and other solution solved it and same solution of engaging was used
for cameroon and  not antishutdown policey.

So why some people will come up with making the Afrinic ICC of Internet in
our motherland using the technical policy to think shall solve political
issue.

So i am thinking i given you good answer now now.

Best Regards,

Tutu Ngcaba
Kwazulu Techno Hubs
South Africa

On 12 May 2017 1:42 p.m., "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com> wrote:

>
> On May 12, 2017, at 02:33 , Tutu Ngcaba <pan.afrikhan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No no no brother Elkins
>
> I am not agree with you.
>
> so many people condemn such policy other in ripe say it is stinking
> meaning not good at all.
>
> Only the Icann chairs is saying will support in that ripe video. But he is
> not aware of challenges like why internet is such reason behind like
> polical ones which is not technical.
>
>
> The ICANN chair didn’t say he would support or oppose the policy from what
> I could see. He said that ICANN staff was available to assist in moving the
> policy through the global policy development process and/or to assist in
> drafting the policy or creating an ICANN policy working group to develop
> similar policy related to CCTLDs.
>
> That’s very different from support.
>
> Someone from France even say this bad policy will make government happy
> and smile when ip address stop coming ..meaning no ip no internet ver good
> for government which  like to use paper in the old school ways. It means
> government is happy with such policy for it will give them power and excuse
> to even make more internet shuts and blackout internet instead of the
> government being scare.
>
>
> For draconian regimes that prefer to block access to the internet by their
> citizens, such a claim should not be so easily dismissed. There could well
> be validity to this point of view and it would not surprise me if some
> governments did embrace the lack of address resources as yet another
> convenient control mechanism.
>
> So this message of you saying the bad policy attract many global debate is
> wrong as the debate is negative not good all as so many people in RIPE
> meeting asked so many questions whcih the Mrs.Andrew Alston only refuse to
> answer and keep saying he interested in debate.
>
>
> It has attracted debate. I won’t argue the quality of the debate it has
> attracted, but it has called attention to the issue in question and with
> this type of issue, gaining attention is almost always good regardless of
> the type of attention obtained. People are now discussing internet
> shutdowns as a much more serious issue than before. That is a positive sign
> of progress on the actual issue.
>
> Unfortunately, the actual issue is out of scope for the PDP. The PDP
> really is the wrong tool for this job. However, I think that is partially a
> reflection of the concept that if the only tool you have is a hammer, then
> every fastener looks like a nail.
>
> Even the zimbawabwe mugabe mentioning very bad publicity for the president
> who am sure will shut that internet very fast if it causes political
> problem. even the 1994 mention of people die even if internet is there
> nothing will happen because it is politics with long history.
>
>
> The democratization of communications and communications technologies are
> not a panacea for solving these problems, but they are a very important
> element in any workable solution. People cannot solve problems they do not
> know exist. Without democratized communications capabilities, it is much
> easier for “governments” to limit the visibility of such problems on the
> larger world stage.
>
> In syria the people die, in somalia they die and other places internet is
> there or not... this is politics not technical stuffs.
>
>
> The boundary between politics and technical is not nearly as black and
> white as you would imply in this statement. As I said in the previous
> paragraph, internet is not a panacea, but it is an important element in
> solving these problems.
>
> So i do not the agree with you at all brother elkins.
>
>
> What would you propose as a better alternative to the current open
> multi-stakeholder process?
>
> Owen
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Tutu Ngcaba
> Kwazulu Techno Hubs
> South Africa
>
>
> On 12 May 2017 11:43 a.m., "Mark Elkins" <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:
>
>> The PDP allows anyone to submit any ideas and policies, irrespective of
>> who they are, where they are from, and what their ideas are, in a free
>> exchange of ideas and in the name of freedom of expression and freedom of
>> speech.
>>
>> Some policies are pretty straight forward, make lots of sense and should
>> simply be implemented. they don't need lots of discussion - more along the
>> lines of - "why didn't I think and suggest that?".
>>
>> Other policies are simply way out and should be still-born - such as the
>> PDP-BIS proposal, which destroys a number of the qualities of how the PDP
>> currently runs.
>>
>> The "Internet Shutdown" policy has caused discussion around the world.
>> This is proof of the multi-stakeholder approach at work (its being argued
>> by multiple stakeholders, both for and against). The very fact that this
>> policy has engendered so much debate does not indicate a problem with the
>> policy, rather, it shows that the process works and is resulting in debate
>> and discussion that is both constructive and healthy.
>>
>> On 12/05/2017 09:43, Arnaud AMELINA wrote:
>>
>> +1 Dear Mirriam and Badru
>>
>> Cela sera fixé par notre projet de politique PDP-BIS.
>>
>> This will be fixed by our PDP-BIS policy proposal.
>>
>> @Saul, je confirme que cette politique de shutdown est inopportune sur le
>> PDP, c'est une véritable perte de temps, car d'autres politique ssont sur
>> la table du PDP et personne n'a encore réagit par rapport à elles et on
>> tourne autour d'une politique dont tout le monde sait qu'elle n'aboutira
>> pas, et on nous avance comme argument le débat que ça va susciter, c'est
>> comme si on se moque de notre communauté de techniciens. Nous ne sommes pas
>> Politiciens, laissons cet aspect à ceux qui en ont la compétence, pour en
>> débattre, et nous nous serons là en appui à leur décision. Dicsutons sur
>> les choes qui feront avancer afrinic eet non celles qui lui créeront des
>> problèmes. JE voudrais inviter tous les membres de cette communauté à se
>> concentrer sur les vrais missions d'Afrinic et débatre de son avenir. Merci
>> pour votre conmpréhension.
>>
>>
>> @Saul, I confirm that this shutdown policy is inappropriate on the PDP,
>> it is a real waste of time because other policies are on the PDP table and
>> nobody has yet reacted with them and we turn Around to  a policy that
>> everyone knows will not succeed, and we are advanced as an argument the
>> debate that will arouse, it is like we laugh at our community of
>> technicians. We are not Politicians, we leave it to those who have the
>> competence to debate it, and we will be there to support their decision. Let
>> us discuss on things that will move AFRINIC forward instead of those that
>> will create problems. I would like to invite all members of this
>> community to focus on Afrinic's real missions and to discuss its future. Thank
>> you for your understanding.
>>
>> Cordialement.
>>
>> Arnaud.
>>
>> 2017-05-12 7:10 GMT+00:00 Saul Stein <saul at enetworks.co.za>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Please can you explain how this is an abuse of the RPD?
>>>
>>>
>>> We have a serious issue of internet shutdowns on our continent. The
>>> impact that it has on education, the economy etc is immeasurable!
>>>
>>> This should be of grace concern to all of us!
>>>
>>>
>>> The authors of the policy have stated numerous times that this is an
>>> evolving proposal.
>>>
>>>
>>> The important thing is that it is encouraging global debate on how to
>>> resolve this issue. THAT is what this proposal is about – ways to prevent
>>> this from happening.
>>>
>>>
>>> Whatever solutions we come up with – but that can only happen with this
>>> debate, so I don’t see how it’s a waist!
>>>
>>>
>>> Saul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Mirriam [mailto:mirriamlauren at yahoo.com]
>>> *Sent:* 11 May 2017 08:24 PM
>>> *To:* Tutu Ngcaba <pan.afrikhan at gmail.com>; Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za
>>> >
>>> *Cc:* General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss at afrinic.net>;
>>> AfriNIC List <rpd at afrinic.net>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Community-Discuss] Controversial anti-shutdown policy
>>> discussed at RIPE
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>> I totally agree with what Badru has stated and I really hope the PDP
>>> update policy proposal on the table before us can help to improve the
>>> Afrinic policy development process and environment notwithstanding quality
>>> of work so as to avoid such abuses of the pdp.
>>>
>>>
>>> KR,
>>>
>>> Mirriam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, May 10, 2017, 1:41:29 PM GMT+3, Tutu Ngcaba <
>>> pan.afrikhan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Brother Elkins,
>>>
>>>
>>> The ICANN chairman Steve said some concern of internet shutdown will
>>> undermine the missions of Icann and the Afrinic and they two have the potential
>>> power to do something in return.
>>>
>>>
>>> The Afrinic Government Working Group AFGWG can work with the ICANN to
>>> achieve more mutlistakeholders talkings and meetings. This is what needs to
>>> be done in return.
>>>
>>> I ask the AFGWG to do some taking to the ICANN and they can meet our
>>> governments for education on economic important of Internet.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Tutu Ngcaba
>>> Kwazulu Techno Hubs
>>> South Africa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 May 2017 12:53 p.m., "Mark Elkins" <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:
>>>
>>> I downloaded the complete video  from RIPE and watched it a few times. I
>>> was also watching live.
>>>
>>> Its large - but if you can do, download it and watch it.
>>>
>>> https://ripe74.ripe.net/archiv e/video/Andrew_Alston-Anti-
>>> Shutdown_Policies_-_The_Ration ale-20170508-171822.mp4
>>> <https://ripe74.ripe.net/archive/video/Andrew_Alston-Anti-Shutdown_Policies_-_The_Rationale-20170508-171822.mp4>
>>> '
>>>
>>>
>>> Then again, when the Chairman of ICANN stands up and says that ICANN can
>>> help.
>>>
>>> "Hi, my name is Steve Crocker, I am Chairman of ICANN and I'm here to
>>> help you. (Regarding) take out of the root the affected ccTLD names" and he
>>> then volunteered assistance from ICANN staff - also saying it would take
>>> between two and five years to get to a decision whether to proceed or not.
>>>
>>> The current policy concept does not go that far - but to me - certainly
>>> suggests that the idea of punitive actions against governments is worth
>>> looking at.
>>>
>>> I regard it like a nuclear bomb. When in the hands of sane people (RIR's
>>> and ICANN), it is a threat - to persuade bad actors to have second thoughts
>>> against cutting people off from access to the Internet. If governments
>>> choose to cut people off from access to the Internet for political reasons,
>>> to me this is undermining the core mission of ICANN and the RIR's, both of
>>> whom have the potential power to do something in return. We need to enable
>>> that power from being simply a potential to being ready for use and hope
>>> its never needed to be used.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/05/2017 11:01, Noah wrote:
>>>
>>> Mmmm on the contrary seems like most folk on the floor disagreed with
>>> the contraversial policy and its approach no matter how much the Arthors
>>> seek for better ways to improve it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Some suggested multistake holder engagement and in particular Leslie
>>> Daigle comments on the floor are worth taking into serious considerations
>>> by the way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Leslie Daigle of ISOC agrees that there is a problem. She has concerns
>>> but sounded to me more would like to see something. She just doesn't want
>>> to see dialogue being undermined by this policy.
>>>
>>> Perhaps talk is not enough?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The best comment in my opinion was from the Alan Durand who reminded
>>> everyone what the real core mission of the RIR community is,  and that
>>> is....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd say he was more worried about the policy being used for much more
>>> than it is currently intended for. (referenced to the colour of people's
>>> hair as a reason to cut them off the Internet).
>>>
>>>
>>> "To allocate resources and maintain the accuracy of the
>>> database".PERIOD. [1]
>>>
>>>
>>> Noah
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]I have had in the past folk state statements like "How some ome runs
>>> his network is none of anyones business and in that matter policing the
>>> network is none of AFRINICs business"
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 May 2017 10:39 a.m., "Andrew Alston" <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.c
>>> om <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Marcus,
>>>
>>>
>>> Just some feedback for the community.
>>>
>>>
>>> It's been a great experience here at RIPE and some of the ideas given
>>> and the extensive discussions following the presentation referred to by
>>> Marcus have been both useful and informative.
>>>
>>>
>>> Draft 2 will be submitted shortly very much in line with what I
>>> presented in that presentation - and before the 7 day deadline as per the
>>> PDP so we can discuss on that basis.
>>>
>>>
>>> Following the meeting in Nairobi, I suspect we will then be gathering
>>> still further input and further drafts will follow, if there is no
>>> consensus found on the floor for the draft 2 that will be submitted.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think for myself, the most important thing I have seen at RIPE so far,
>>> is the huge willingness by people from every walk of life to engage in
>>> dialog and discussion over this, and it was heartening to see both my own
>>> positions and the positions of those I was discussing with shift as
>>> explanations were given and questions were asked and answered.  Since
>>> giving that presentation I have barely had a minute to think as people
>>> approached me to talk this through - and I really hope to see such
>>> engagement in Nairobi, because it truly showed the benefit of a multi
>>> stakeholder approach where open dialog and communication can happen, even
>>> in the absence of agreement and in the face of controversial material where
>>> people hold strong and emotive views.
>>>
>>>
>>> I look forward to the discussions on the floor of the PDP and engaging
>>> with all of you to hear your thoughts and views and finding the right
>>> solution to the issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From:* Marcus K. G. Adomey <madomey at hotmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 9, 2017 11:48:42 PM
>>> *To:* rpd at afrinic.net; community-discuss at afrinic.net
>>> *Subject:* [Community-Discuss] Controversial anti-shutdown policy
>>> discussed at RIPE
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Colleagues.
>>>
>>>
>>> You might want to see the presentation of the controversial draft
>>> anti-shutdown policy (AFPUB-2017-GEN-001-DRAFT-01) at a recent RIPE
>>> meeting.  I found the questions/comments from the RIPE community similar to
>>> that shared by many on the RPD, mostly about the inappropriateness of such
>>> policy in our region… or any other for that matter.  Enjoy watching it.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://ripe74.ripe.net/archiv es/video/41/
>>> <https://ripe74.ripe.net/archives/video/41/>
>>>
>>> <https://ripe74.ripe.net/archives/video/41/>
>>>
>>> Archives – RIPE 74 <https://ripe74.ripe.net/archives/video/41/>
>>>
>>> ripe74.ripe.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________ _________________
>>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mail man/listinfo/community-discuss
>>> <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________ _________________
>>>
>>> RPD mailing list
>>>
>>> RPD at afrinic.net
>>>
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mail man/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Mark James ELKINS  -  Posix Systems - (South) Africa
>>>
>>> mje at posix.co.za       Tel: +27.128070590 <+27%2012%20807%200590>  Cell: +27.826010496 <+27%2082%20601%200496>
>>>
>>> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________ _________________
>>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mail man/listinfo/community-discuss
>>> <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark James ELKINS  -  Posix Systems - (South) Africamje at posix.co.za       Tel: +27.128070590 <+27%2012%20807%200590>  Cell: +27.826010496 <+27%2082%20601%200496>
>> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20170514/88bd960f/attachment.html>