[Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] Accountability assessment - bylaws changes

Christian Bope christian.bope at unikin.ac.cd
Sat Sep 17 06:06:04 UTC 2016


Dear Alan,

Thank you for your response on my second  question, I check my archive and
revert back to you those items.

What about my first question on
How the decisions was made for the  “No consensus” /  “no objections?

Have a nice weekend.

Speaking on my own capacity.

Regards,

On 17 Sep 2016 12:01 p.m., "Alan Barrett" <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> wrote:

> [posting only to community-discuss.  Please do not cross-post]
>
> > On 16 Sep 2016, at 20:38, Bope Domilongo Christian <
> christianbope at gmail.com> wrote:
> > After reading the document, I have two quick question before going to
> the substance of the changes.
> > 1.  How the decisions was made for the  “No consensus” /  “no
> objections”?
>
> I read and listened to discussions, both on and off the mailing lists.  If
> you think I misunderstood the discussion, or missed something, then please
> point it out.
>
> > 2. I remember  that during the discussions, other propositions  of
> amendment were made in addition to the points in your discussion document.
> Have these points been considered ?
>
> Please list those items.
>
> Alan Barrett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20160917/1409a068/attachment.html>


More information about the Community-Discuss mailing list