[Community-Discuss] IPv6 Chapter 254

Honest Ornella GANKPA honest1989 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 14 10:55:23 UTC 2016

+1 Noah

I will add that rather than discussing random topics uncoordinated, this
discussion should be moved to rpd list. The sooner we reach concensus and
adopt this soft landing policy, the sooner we can move forward / focus on
ipv6 deployment. The status quo benefits no one in my opinion

Honest Ornella GANKPA

2016-10-14 11:20 GMT+01:00 Noah <noah at neo.co.tz>:

> On 14 Oct 2016 09:17, "Andrew Alston" <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >   Basically, individuals can apply to the access fund for projects that
> need v4 space that will directly benefit the continent, they would have to
> prove v6 deployment alongside it (not just plans to take a v6 block and
> announce it, actual deployment plans, which would be monitored), and the
> project would have to provide KPI’s etc etc.
> >
> >
> +1 Andrew and I totally agree with you.
> Similarly there is a policy whose text proposes the same narrative...
> http://afrinic.net/fr/community/policy-development/
> policy-proposals/1815-ipv4-soft-landing-bis
> I believe this covers pretty much what we are so far discusssing.
> Noah
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20161014/ba62f34c/attachment.html>

More information about the Community-Discuss mailing list