[Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] AFRINIC Board Representative to the NRO NC/ASO AC

Andrew Alston Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
Tue Nov 1 14:49:27 UTC 2016

Using this thought process hypothetically, and speaking strictly as an individual

If this is the mindset that we wish to adopt, and I am certainly not saying it is, would it not be a good idea to write into the bylaws that if someone runs for election and loses, they should not be eligible to run again for a defined period (2 years or whatever), since based on this logic, they have been rejected?

As I said, I’m not taking a position at all on if this is the stance we should take – I have my views on that but will keep them to myself – but *IF* it is the stance – then let us take it all the way and consider all the implications of it.


From: Walubengo J <jwalu at yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Walubengo J <jwalu at yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, 1 November 2016 at 16:54
To: Jackson Muthili <jacksonmuthi at gmail.com>, Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za>
Cc: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss at afrinic.net>, "members-discuss at afrinic.net" <members-discuss at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [members-discuss] AFRINIC Board Representative to the NRO NC/ASO AC

Alain A, Badru, Paulos  never made it back to the Board.  I did not know that, that meant community had rejected them. Maybe  we change our bylaws to reflect this new reasoning?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20161101/905aa10f/attachment.html>

More information about the Community-Discuss mailing list