[Community-Discuss] Another BOD Governance Issue

[sergekbk]

Hello Alan,

The point is with BOD proceeding.
We can notice some inconstencies in conflict of Interest management.
Sunday, Haitham and Aminata are in the slate of candidates.
1. Sunday  can chair the session while Haitham  can't because of conflict of interest when Sunday lost connectivity.
This seems a Bylaws (section 19.1)breach as Haitham (Vice Chair) is present but the chaimanship is given to Kris.
2.Sunday and Haitham abstained to vote to approve the nominations while Aminata did not.

Regards.

Serge IlungaCell: +243814443160Skype: sergekbkR.D.Congo-------- Original message --------From: Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> Date: 07/22/2016  10:23  (GMT+01:00) To: General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss at afrinic.net> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] Another BOD Governance Issue 

> On 22 Jul 2016, at 13:05, sergekbk <sergekbk at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> As candidates for the last BoD elections, i went to read the board meeting where the elections slate was approved.

The Board did not approve the slate.  The Board approved the nominations.  The Election Committee finalises the slate, and has the freedom to choose which approved nominations do or do not appear on the slate.

> From the may 2016 minutes, i noticed  surprisingly that  the board agreed  at the beginning of the meeting that board members who were running for election can participe in the discussions on the slate, but not vote. see below

The minutes refer to approval of nominations, not approval of the slate.

Alan Barrett


_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20160722/073570c0/attachment.html>