[Community-Discuss] Resolution 201604.274 about Set-Up fees

[Noah]

On 28 Jun 2016 19:14, "Keshwarsingh Nadan" <kn at millenium.net.mu> wrote:
>
> Dear Chair,
>
>
>
> 1. The Board has always been responsible for setting the fees. “Review”
includes the right to change the fees.
>
>
>
> Agree on this one.
>
>

I certainly ackowledge the same with a reservation that resource members
views on the same are significant.

>
> 2. The problem being addressed is that every allocation or assignment
event requires effort from staff, and it is not fair for that effort to
sometimes be undertaken free of charge.
>
>
>
> The staff has always been and is presently remunerated for that effort,
so how come that remunerated effort is sometimes undertaken free of charge
? Underpaid staff ?
>
>

+1 and makes sense..

>
> 3. AFRINIC requires more revenue, not less.
>
>
>
> Why does AFRINIC requires more revenue ? For what purpose ?
>
>

The chair never responded to this adequetly in his most recent submission.

>
> 4. If the proposed charging scheme had been in place during 2015, then
income from allocation and assignment fees would have been about USD 550k.
Actual income from allocation and assignment fees in 2015 was about USD
350k. Therefore, the clarification that allocation or assignment fees are
once per allocation or assignment, not once per member, is expected to
raise about USD 200k per year.
>
>
>
> Motive behind an expected US $200k/yr?
>

The chairs response to this was never clear in his most recent submission
of fees.

>
>
> 5. Since it is being introduced in the middle of 2016, the impact on the
2016 revenue is expected to be an additional USD 100k.
>
>
>
> Motive behind an expected additional US $100k for 2016?
>
>

This was never responded too adequetly?

>
> Regards,
>
> K
>

Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20160714/f82a9b33/attachment.html>