[Community-Discuss] AFRINIC Council of Elders
Evelyn Namara
evelyngeek at gmail.com
Wed Jul 13 08:31:17 UTC 2016
Owen,
Your latest submission is evidence enough that you personally have a
problem with Badru being on the CoE and thus are trying to justify for the
board why they should or should not appoint him. I get it, this is your
personal opinion. I also would like you to respect other people's opinions
such as Omo's suggestion that since we don't yet have 6 appointed members
to the CoE, leaving Badru out is merely discrimination.
All I'm saying is, don't elevate your points and try to minimize other
people's inputs.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 22:01 , Omo Oaiya <Omo.Oaiya at wacren.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12 July 2016 at 21:03, Mike Silber <silber.mike at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nishal +1
>>
>> Maybe a hypothetical if I may: what if a former Chairperson were to pass,
>> or to be unable or unwilling to serve on the CoE, or even if they were to
>> be convicted of an offense after their term that would disqualify them as a
>> director.
>>
> I don't think the community would want an unable or unwilling CoE member,
>> or a convict.
>>
>
> No community would. We want them because of their experience as former
> Chairs
> I read the 'open to' in 16.1 as former chairs are willing to consider or
> be considered. So some might decline or be denied
>
>
>> So I cannot see how automatic appointment could be implied.
>
>
> This is what bothers me. We don't yet have 6 past chairs and we are
> discriminating without reason on appointment to CoE? How does this improve
> trust?
>
>
> Omo,
>
> You are claiming facts not in evidence.
>
> The board chair clearly stated that the matter has not yet been considered
> by the board. This is not discrimination, it is a lack of action in either
> direction, positive or negative. He further noted that it will be on the
> agenda at the next board meeting.
>
> Claiming discrimination when there clearly isn’t any such thing going on
> is nonsensical.
>
> Finally, appointment to the CoE is at the discretion of the board. They
> are free to invite a past chair or not entirely at their discretion and
> nothing requires them to explain their reasoning to the community. If you
> don’t like their decision, vote for different board members next time there
> is an election.
>
> Personally, given the manner in which Badru stepped down from the
> chairmanship and the subsequent incidents leading to his departure from the
> board, I would say that the board has more than ample reason if they choose
> not to invite him to join the CoE. However, I respect that this is a
> decision entirely at their discretion and I will accept whatever decision
> they make.
>
> The purpose of the CoE is to advise the board. The board must be free to
> choose who it does or does not want to receive advice from.
>
> Owen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> Community-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
>
--
Evelyn Namara | T: +256 754 440893 | E: enamara at riseup.net | Twitter:
@enamara <http://www.twitter.com/enamara> | Skype: enamara
PGP: B94D 3950 38D6 914A E054 D6C5 E82E 0F66 DC01 E30D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/community-discuss/attachments/20160713/3a113495/attachment.html>
More information about the Community-Discuss
mailing list