[AISPC] Programme

[Mark Tinka]

On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:45:00 PM Geert Jan de 
Groot wrote:

> There is of course the afnog plenary, unless we decide
> not to have it (but I think we can't not have it, and we
> should have it).

The AfNOG plenary is a mainstay.

What we could do is have a general plenary where both 
operational and political types meet. This could be the 
opening and closing plenaries, which could be keynotes.

Then, on other days or at other times during the week, the 
AfNOG plenary meeting, as well as breakout sessions could 
take place, alongside the AIS ones (i.e., engineering and 
political sessions going on side-by-side).

> I don't see more space for expansion.

This is my concern too, particularly rooming.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/aispc/attachments/20130216/2f6b81fd/attachment.bin