[AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!

[Fabian Jr]

thanks John,

let me do my homework too to see how best we can adopt your method as it adds no more expenses 

best regards,
 

 

Arbogast Fabian,

cell:+255-78-447-8387


Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:01:32 +0200
From: jhay at meraka.org.za
To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net
Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!

Hi Fabian,

Our approach was to 
deploy dual stack, so every router, server and host have an IPv6 and an 
IPv4 address. So if something wants to communicate with another device 
that have an IPv6 address, it will use its IPv6 address as the source. 
If it wants to communicate with a device that have an IPv4 address, it 
will use its IPv4 address as the source. If it wants to communicate with
 a device that have both IPv6 and IPv4 addresses, it depends on the OS 
what is preferred. 

That way we do not need NAT64. We will phase out IPv4 when it is not needed anymore for internet or local communication.

Regards

John


On 13 May 2016 at 09:35, Fabian Jr <afabbie at hotmail.com> wrote:



thanks Noah

 

 

Arbogast Fabian,

cell:+255-78-447-8387


Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:00:37 +0300
From: noah at neo.co.tz
To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net
Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!

Hi Fabian,

The Cisco ASR boxes support what you seek to implement. You can check out the ASR1K if you have the budget.

The Juniper MX series do support what you seek to implement.

You may find this article fundamentally interesting...

https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/112121/ipv6-stateful-nat64-configuration-example

Cheers,

Noah 

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Fabian Jr <afabbie at hotmail.com> wrote:



Folks…

We are looking into way we can gradually deploy IPv6 in our network…

Already
 we have it running and we have one Test Machine……. The challenge we are
 facing is that from that machine with IPv6 and from other Machines with
 IPv4 we can’t communicate in either direction..

IPv6 Machine just communicate with IPv6 only machines like wise IPv4 Machines just communicate with IPv4 machines ….

A work around is to do NAT64 between the two subnets….

It seems the hardware (Cisco 2921 router with IOS Version 15.0) can’t do NAT64……..

From
 the internet it seems NAT64 runs on IOS-XE and IOS-CGSE which are 
Hardware dependent……..seems that we can’t upgrade IOS Version 15.0 to 
any the two which supports NAT64.

Before committing any expenses to acquire new router we want to reach out to the community for comments and advises….

Pls. review and advise.

Thank you…

 

 

Arbogast Fabian,

cell:+255-78-447-8387
 		 	   		  

_______________________________________________

AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list

AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net

https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss




-- 
./noah


_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss 		 	   		  

_______________________________________________

AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list

AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net

https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss





_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/afripv6-discuss/attachments/20160513/140029ba/attachment.html>