[AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!

[Fabian Jr]

thanks Loganaden
 

 

Arbogast Fabian,

cell:+255-78-447-8387


> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:16:43 +0400
> From: loganaden at gmail.com
> To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net
> Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!
> 
> Hi Fabian,
> 
> OpenBSD also has a NAT64 implementation. OpenBSD's PF has an easy to
> learn syntax.
> 
> e.g: http://davidcrumpton.blogspot.com/2014/04/ipv6-only-network-with-dns64-nat64-and.html
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabian Jr <afabbie at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > thanks Daniel and other folks ...
> >
> > may be i did not make myself clear ...
> >
> > thanks for your advise to use Linux box for NAT64 .... i will explore that
> > or if you have done that already pls. guide me.... i can work on Linux......
> >
> >
> > Arbogast Fabian,
> > cell:+255-78-447-8387
> >
> >
> >> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:53 +0400
> >> From: daniel at afrinic.net
> >> To: afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net
> >> Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:06:34AM +0300, Fabian Jr wrote:
> >> >
> >> > thanks Daniel for your quick repsonse too..
> >> >
> >> > i said already that i want to do a Dual Stack Setup between IPv6
> >> > subnet and IPv4 Subnet..... to be able to parallel run the two
> >> > versions for sometimes and gradually remove IPv4 ........
> >>
> >> Why do you want to remove IPv4?
> >>
> >> Dual-stack means the systems run both stacks. What I understand from the
> >> above is you do *not* want dual-stack, but rather to have some subnets
> >> that are single stack ipv4 and others that are single stack ipv6.
> >>
> >> But why? What is the goal of that?
> >>
> >> >
> >> > this is possible by enabling NAT64 in the router between the two
> >> > networks........
> >>
> >> If you intent is as above - to have different segments where some are
> >> ipv4 only and others are ipv6 only that can inter-communicate, then yes:
> >> In that case NAT64 is really the only option.
> >>
> >> However, NAT64 does not have to be done on a new expensive cisco box.
> >> You can implement that on a linux based gateway on a PC or VM too.
> >>
> >> I'm still not sure why you would want to. But you can :)
> >>
> >> - Daniel
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
> >> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net
> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
> > AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
> AfrIPv6-Discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/afripv6-discuss/attachments/20160513/cd4d9eed/attachment.html>