<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'><br>thanks Loganaden<br> <br>
<br>
<em><font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#1f497d">Arbogast Fabian,</font></em><br>
<em><font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#1f497d">cell:+255-78-447-8387</font></em><br><br><br><div>> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:16:43 +0400<br>> From: loganaden@gmail.com<br>> To: afripv6-discuss@afrinic.net<br>> Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!<br>> <br>> Hi Fabian,<br>> <br>> OpenBSD also has a NAT64 implementation. OpenBSD's PF has an easy to<br>> learn syntax.<br>> <br>> e.g: http://davidcrumpton.blogspot.com/2014/04/ipv6-only-network-with-dns64-nat64-and.html<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabian Jr <afabbie@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> ><br>> > thanks Daniel and other folks ...<br>> ><br>> > may be i did not make myself clear ...<br>> ><br>> > thanks for your advise to use Linux box for NAT64 .... i will explore that<br>> > or if you have done that already pls. guide me.... i can work on Linux......<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Arbogast Fabian,<br>> > cell:+255-78-447-8387<br>> ><br>> ><br>> >> Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:53 +0400<br>> >> From: daniel@afrinic.net<br>> >> To: afripv6-discuss@afrinic.net<br>> >> Subject: Re: [AfrIPv6-Discuss] NAT64 for Dual Stacking!<br>> >><br>> >> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:06:34AM +0300, Fabian Jr wrote:<br>> >> ><br>> >> > thanks Daniel for your quick repsonse too..<br>> >> ><br>> >> > i said already that i want to do a Dual Stack Setup between IPv6<br>> >> > subnet and IPv4 Subnet..... to be able to parallel run the two<br>> >> > versions for sometimes and gradually remove IPv4 ........<br>> >><br>> >> Why do you want to remove IPv4?<br>> >><br>> >> Dual-stack means the systems run both stacks. What I understand from the<br>> >> above is you do *not* want dual-stack, but rather to have some subnets<br>> >> that are single stack ipv4 and others that are single stack ipv6.<br>> >><br>> >> But why? What is the goal of that?<br>> >><br>> >> ><br>> >> > this is possible by enabling NAT64 in the router between the two<br>> >> > networks........<br>> >><br>> >> If you intent is as above - to have different segments where some are<br>> >> ipv4 only and others are ipv6 only that can inter-communicate, then yes:<br>> >> In that case NAT64 is really the only option.<br>> >><br>> >> However, NAT64 does not have to be done on a new expensive cisco box.<br>> >> You can implement that on a linux based gateway on a PC or VM too.<br>> >><br>> >> I'm still not sure why you would want to. But you can :)<br>> >><br>> >> - Daniel<br>> >><br>> >><br>> >> _______________________________________________<br>> >> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list<br>> >> AfrIPv6-Discuss@afrinic.net<br>> >> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss<br>> ><br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list<br>> > AfrIPv6-Discuss@afrinic.net<br>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss<br>> ><br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list<br>> AfrIPv6-Discuss@afrinic.net<br>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss<br></div> </div></body>
</html>