[afripv6-discuss] What have you done for IPv6 lately,
since the 1st of January, 2013?
ndg at ieee.org
Tue Feb 19 16:15:14 SAST 2013
On 19 Feb 2013, at 3:50 PM, Guy Antony Halse <G.halse at ru.ac.za> wrote:
> On Tue 2013-02-19 (08:22), Carlos M. martinez wrote:
>> <my opinion here is strictly my own and doesn't necessarily reflect my
^^ as above.
>> I fret when I read "no customer is asking for it" because no customer
>> will ask for IPv6 _ever_. Just as no one here or in the Internet ever
>> asked for IPv4.
> So I am the customer who *did* ask my home DSL provider for IPv6. For the
> very reasons expressed above I know I'm in the minority, which is precisely
> why I made a point of asking on behalf of those who don't know they need it.
i did the same.
from my home:
katala:~ nishal$ ifconfig en1 inet6
en1: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,SMART,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet6 fe80::e6ce:8fff:fe0a:wxyz%en1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
inet6 2c0f:fc00:a000:1010:e6ce:8fff:fe0a:wxyz prefixlen 64 autoconf
inet6 2c0f:fc00:a000:1010:c59a:7647:9753:fba5 prefixlen 64 autoconf temporary
it's via a tunnel to a router inside my DSL providers network.
but so what? it works. quite well actually.
> The answer I got was "we don't support IPv6 at the moment". I asked if they
> had a timeframe for deployment, so I'd know when to ask again. The answer:
> "we have no plans to support IPv6".
> Unfortunately I think this is very common. There's a catch22 here...
vote with your wallet...
using IPv6 from home i've logged tickets with different operators, in my home country when i noticed something broken.
usually, most of them respond. some of them have even fixed anomalies.
some - particularly the larger mobile operators - don't. i haven't undertaken to find out why.
oh. i don't browse to yahoo...
but it's not just about apathy, or ignorance. it's cost as well.
in one sub-saharan country, the ex-incumbent still controls the copper (last-mile) for that country's DSL users. the ex-incumbent's LLU offering (it's L2TP, but let's not quibble) will allow ISPs to provision IPv6 natively instead of via tunnels. but the cost of the LLU service is 30% more than the cost of the established mechanism for connecting DSL users.
why - in a market that's facing ever decreasing ARPU - will you, as a broadband operator, want to pay the 30% premium if your clients can't tell the difference?
More information about the afripv6-discuss