[afripv6-discuss] IPV6 issuse
ndg at ieee.org
Thu Nov 29 13:38:11 SAST 2012
On 29 Nov 2012, at 1:01 PM, Imadeldeen Ellazim Gmma Hamid <emadedeen at sudatel.sd> wrote:
> In IPV4 there is a lack of numbers so the use of private IP addresses solve this problem , and when users need to log the Internet they must share limited numbers of global IP address, and due to this sharing we cannot know exactly who is using the global IP address in a certain time. When we totally migrate to IPV6 and we know that in IPv6 we had a great numbers of IP addresses,
> 1- can we manage to a sign IPV6 to every user ?
> 2- and this IPV6 address can be like his ID ?
...for the duration of his ability to connect to that network, yes.
> 3- and when he move from town to another town in my covered network can he use the same IPV6 address ?
that's dependent on the network infrastructure, and business decisions made, on the network behind him.
the right answer is maybe. the more appropriate answer is: "probably not"
hint: because something is technically possible, doesn't mean it *should* be done...
> 4- If this user use his IPV6 address in criminal reasons , can we catch him and introduce him to judgments
again, that's dependent on the underlying network infrastructure.
in general, if you can do this now, with IPv4, you should be able to do the same with IPv6.
because it's possible to have *unique* addresses in IPv6, it's potentially easier to do this in IPv6, than in cases where you are currently NATting in IPv4.
> Now you are here to discuss how to improve Internet which leading to the development in economic while other criminal persons and companies discuss how to improve undesired software and viruses to use them against the developing. How we can stop them from doing that?
that's not really an IPv6, or technical problem... ;-)
More information about the afripv6-discuss