[afripv6-discuss] Are AfriNic's /48 being filtered?

Mark J Elkins mje at posix.co.za
Fri Aug 24 12:50:13 SAST 2007


Right - I'm jumping up and down on my soap box. AfriNIC - can you hear?
People can't get to Critical infrastructure (the co.za system)..
The CO.ZA Registry System is Open to the Whole World - we allow
registrations from Anyone - Anywhere in the world - thus we need to be
seen from anywhere in the world.

Although we are not yet taking IPv6 glue into the COZA registry
(ComingRealSoonNow), we *do* have machines on IPv6 addresses - which
*do* need full and proper internet connectivity right now.

If I'm going to have to renumber - I'd rather do it sooner than later...

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> This is the reason why I always insisted that PI should be /32.
>
> Many people will IGNORE what AfriNIC or other RIRs tell them and will keep
> filtering anything longer than /32.
>
> Nice to have non-reachable critical infrastructures !
>
> In my opinion we should still consider a change in the policy to allow
> AfriNIC to assign a /32 in case is proven, as in this case, than the /48 is
> getting filtered.
>
> The LACNIC policy for critical infrastructures allows that. The staff is
> free to assign a /32 if the situation requires it, even if it seems "wasting
> addresses". At the end a few thousands (in the worst case, because I believe
> it will be just hundreds) of /32 will not make a difference, but the COST of
> getting them working is much smaller that the cost of saving vs. /48.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
>
>
>
>
>   
>> De: Mark J Elkins <mje at posix.co.za>
>> Organización: Posix Systems
>> Responder a: "IPv6 in Africa <afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net>"
>> <afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net>
>> Fecha: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:07:29 +0200
>> Para: "IPv6 in Africa <afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net>"
>> <afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net>
>> Asunto: [afripv6-discuss] Are AfriNic's /48 being filtered?
>>
>> I'm looking at :-
>> http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/dfp/all/?country=za
>>
>> My own /32 block seems to be everywhere - but the block for UniForum is
>> only getting about a 80% penetration around the world.  I see the other
>> /48 is fairing even worse (73% penetration).
>>
>> Initially - I had to ask my Transit (Tiscali) to explicitly allow it.
>>
>> Has AfriNIC explicitly told people (the world) that  2001:43f8::/32 will
>> be used for /48's ???
>> (Do they need to announce this somewhere?)
>>
>> My suspicion is that its being filtered by a number of operators.
>>
>> -- 
>>   .  .     ___. .__      Posix Systems - Sth Africa
>>  /| /|       / /__       mje at posix.co.za  -  Mark J Elkins, SCO ACE, Cisco
>> CCIE
>> / |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS  Tel: +27 12 807 0590  Cell: +27 82 601 0496
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> afripv6-discuss mailing list
>> afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/afripv6-discuss
>>     
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
>
> Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
> http://www.ipv6day.org
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> afripv6-discuss mailing list
> afripv6-discuss at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/afripv6-discuss
>   


-- 
  .  .     ___. .__      Posix Systems - Sth Africa
 /| /|       / /__       mje at posix.co.za  -  Mark J Elkins, SCO ACE, Cisco CCIE
/ |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS  Tel: +27 12 807 0590  Cell: +27 82 601 0496



More information about the afripv6-discuss mailing list