Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] It’s like that in life, there are always bad players and bad losers!

[McTim]

All,

Are these 3 letters referred to in the article part of the public domain?

I do not see them on either the ICANN website under "Correspondence"
or on the DCA website.

If there is a COI, where is the evidence of same?


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel



On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Pierre Lotis NANKEP <lnankep at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Dear Karim,
>
> The situation is not as simple as you want to imagine.
>
> Why we refuse to see things as they are? Why try to distract people by
> saying that there is no conflict? The situation is such that even a blind or
> even a mental patient understands that there is conflict, and that conflict
> is at different  levels.
>
> I advise our community to do not declare victory before the result were
> announced by ICANN.
>
> Let ICANN arbitrate.
>
> However, everyone is free to draw the attention of ICANN on a fact that it
> considers relevant. Is not that the freedom of expression and openness that
> we cry day and night?
>
> Cordially.
>
> --
> Pierre Lotis NANKEP
> IT Engineer / ANTIC
> Web : http://www.antic.cm
> Email (Pro) : pierre.nankep at antic.cm
> GSM : +237 77 66 10 07
> ________________________________
> De : attoumani karim <attoukarim at yahoo.fr>
> À : "africann at afrinic.net" <africann at afrinic.net>
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 12 octobre 2012 7h45
> Objet : [AfrICANN-discuss] It’s like that in life, there are always bad
> players and bad losers!
>
> Colleagues, I react on these two articles:
> http://www.thedomains.com/2012/10/03/dotconnectafrica-sends-third-letter-to-icann-alleging-conflict-of-interest-issues-with-its-board-members-over-africa/
> http://domainingafrica.com/i-will-win-africa-because-i-have-friends-in-high-places-case-of-conflicted-board-members/
>
> If we refer to strings submited to this first round, we can note a demand
> for the string africa (applicant id 1-1243-89583) and another one dotafrica
> (1-1165-42560). I wonder why write these kinds of articles would hear in a
> conflict between two entities for africa string that does not exist. I agree
> that we must avoid conflicts of interest, but for the .Africa, this conflict
> should not exist. There are many cases that can be used to illustrate the
> conflict of interest within ICANN and not the .Africa (to differentiate from
> .DotAfrica)
> I’m sure people who have applied for the DotAfrica (as string) knew they had
> lost in advance the africa!
> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en
>
> ATTOUMANI MOHAMED Karim, Comores
>
> _______________________________________________
> AfrICANN mailing list
> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AfrICANN mailing list
> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>