Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] The Google campaign – An ITU view
Dr Yassin Mshana
ymshana2003 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 14:32:03 SAST 2012
Hello Tim et all, I am having a problem with the Statement below:
*"If you see the matter as I do, that ICANN has asked that governmental
and/or intergovernmental entities weigh in on new gTLDs that have a
geographic scope, it is perfectly reasonable to have the AU involved*."
The issue here is that, was a concensus or even consultations to involve
the AU or AUC in any case? <That is what culminates to abuse and
manipulations I referred to>
You say, "*It is perfectly reasonable*" by Who? You, or Africans who were
Please ...it is matter of principle - It is surprising to sede the AUC
being dragged along without checking what the Political body is being put
into. That is where misleading took place OR maybe the advisory to the AUC
are part na d parcel of the whole act? If so, I for one need to know as I
would not accept to see Africans denied of their voices on issues which are
important to Africa.
On 1 December 2012 00:33, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you see the matter as I do, that ICANN has asked that governmental
> and/or intergovernmental entities weigh in on new gTLDs that have a
> geographic scope, it is perfectly reasonable to have the AU involved.
c/o DFID-Sierra Leone
5 Off Spur Road, Wilberforce
Skype: yassinmshana1, Mobile:+23276926697, Fax: (+232) 22235769
*Do You really NEED TO PRINT THIS?*
* "The illiterates of the 21st century are not those who cannot read or*
* write** but those who cannot learn, relearn and unlearn" Alvin Toffler*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the AfrICANN