Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] RE : 11éme réunion du registre de l'internet pour l'Afrique: L'Afrique appelée à songer à une meilleure inter connectivité

[Baudouin SCHOMBE]

Jean-Robert, Bonjour et bonjour à Gratien et à Mamadou,

Il faudra certainement faire la part des choses.
Certains pays du Maghreb se sont appropriés la technologie numérique suivant
un mécanisme bien réféchi dans lequel les acteurs du sectuer public, du
secteur privé et les utilisateurs se sont concertés. C'est presque la même
démarche dans la plupart des pays de l'Arique de l'Ouest, de l'afrique de
l'Est et dans certains pays de l'afrique australe.

le véritable noir demeure l'afrique centrale où ce genre des dispositions
inclusives et participatives fait défaut jusqu'à ce jour et cela au
détriment d'une population de plus en plus marginalisée.

La développement de la téléphonie mobile est un miroir qui cache des
réalités amères où la communication, devenue indispensable, oblige 85% de la
population à s'offrir ce moyen de communication:
-combien coûte une carte de recharge? Et il faut communiquer presque chaque
jour.
-le marketing agressif des opérateurs GSM qui poussent des familles de plus
en plus pauvres à acheter des cartes de recharge pour gagner des prix comme
un 4x4, un camion... Qui exploite qui? En fait c'est le pauvre qui enrichit
le riche. Le riche devient de plus en plus riche et le pauvre de plus en
plus pauvre.

la connexion internet: faut-il que l'on repète est un exercice de guerrier
et à quel coût? Faut-il encore croire que même dans les secondes villes de
l'afrique centrale, 0.5 % de populations ont accès à l'internet.

Je fais allusion de l'afrique centrale pour avoir été coordonnateur sous
régional de la société civile africaine pour la société de l'information en
afrique centrale.

Entre décideurs politiques et secteur privé , c'est le langage busness,
gagnant-gagnant, commission bien salée.

Ce sont des faits coup de massue lorsqu'il faut développer une solution
technologique accessible aux différentes catégories sociales ou à des
corporations professionnles telles que les agriculteurs, les pêcheurs, les
éleveurs etc...

Pourtant, un bon nombre de pays africains y sont parvenus: Sénégal, Mali,
Burkina Faso, Bénin, Ouganda etc...

Lors des réunions préparatoires du SMSI,  il y a eu la très belle expérience
dans la participation de tous les acteurs: gouvernement, secteur prive et
société civile.

Oui, Adiel a vraiment raison, il faut de la coopération et un dialogue
permanent entre tous les acteurs.

Baudouin


Le 27 novembre 2009 10:53, Jean-Robert Hountomey <hrobert at iservices.tg> a
écrit :

>  Gratien, I don't fully agree with you.
>
> Je pense que Adiel le Directeur General d'AfriNIC a trouve la bonne formule
> en faisant un appel a la cooperation et au dialogue entre tous les
> acteurs. Il faut que chaque partie trouve le moyen de transcrire ses propos
> dans le langage des autres. Par exemple que les techs trouvent le moyen de
> parler aux politiques et Vice versa. Que les business trouvent le moyen de
> parler aux autres acteurs etc.. Que la societe civile trouve les mots pour
> parler aux autres ......
>
> Sinon effectivement bcp de choses etranges arrivent dans nos pays et les
> exemples sont enormes:
>
> - dans le secteur des mobiles on est tous convaincus que l'avenir est la
> bas pour l'Afrique et c'est en ce moment que certains regulateurs trouvent
> opportun de mettre des prix exhorbitans pour l'acquisition de SHORT CODES.
> (Finalement ce seront seulement les structures exterieures qui pourront
> encore une fois venir s'implenter sur nos marches, pour faire du business et
> pour rapatrier leurs benefices che eux)
>
> - l'acces a Internet reste critique et on crie partout digital divide et
> autres mais on ne veut pas mettre de points d'exchanges dans nos pays pour
> encourager et augmenter le traffic local. De plus ces points interessent les
> fournisseurs de contenus comme Google.  Ceci penalisent meme nos pays qui
> ont toutes les technologies (fibre, lien Wireless ) pour echanger du traffic
> entre eux. C'est grave que deux pays frontaliers doivent payer de l'argent a
> un fournisseur international pour le traffic entre eux.
>
> - on parle de securite, cybercrimilate etc... On sait tous techniquement
> qu'un reseau non protege peut transporter entre 10 et 25% de traffic non
> desirable. On a deja de petits reseaux.
> Mais on ne voit tres peu de choses se mettre en place.
>
> Bref c'est un travail que nous devons tous faire
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* media tic <media.tic01 at gmail.com>
> *To:* africann at afrinic.net
> *Sent:* Friday, November 27, 2009 7:47 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] RE : 11éme réunion du registre de
> l'internet pour l'Afrique: L'Afrique appelée à songer à une meilleure inter
> connectivité
>
> Mamadou,
>
> J'ai l'impression que les professionnels (en tout cas dans mon pays), sont
> plus intéressés par les affaires que par la vulgarisation. A tel point
> qu'ils semblent évoluer en vase clos. Dans un secteur où la communication
> devrait être l'attitude normale, c'est plutôt le cloisonnement qui règne.
> Seules les informations commerciales des providers sont disponibles. Rien
> d'autres. Et lorsqu'on leur propose de communiquer, il y a très peu de
> chances d'obtenir gain de cause. Et si les pouvoirs publics ne font pas
> mieux (ou ne comprennent pas les enjeux), on risque de ne jamais combler
> cette fameuse "fracture numérique" qui nous fait tant défaut.
>
> Gratien KITAMBALA
> Directeur de Rédaction
> Mensuel Medi at tic
> Kinshasa/RDC
> http://mediatic.unblog.fr
>
>
>
> On 11/26/09, LO MAMADOU <alfamamadou at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gratien, vous touchez la un point essentiel pour le développement
>> d'internet en Afrique; il faut bien que les gouvernements s'impliquent à
>> coté des professionnels pour faire la promotion d'internet. D'autres part,
>> nous, professionnels devont davantage nous ouvrir vers les pouvoirs publics
>> et mener un travail de communication intense pour mieux poser et expliquer
>> les enjeux et l'importance des technologies internet. Il ya un fossé énorme
>> entre gouvernants et les communautés professionnels.
>>
>> Mamadou LO
>>
>> > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:38:12 +0200
>> > From: africann-request at afrinic.net
>> > Subject: AfrICANN Digest, Vol 33, Issue 34
>> > To: africann at afrinic.net
>> >
>> > Send AfrICANN mailing list submissions to
>> > africann at afrinic.net
>> >
>> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> > africann-request at afrinic.net
>> >
>> > You can reach the person managing the list at
>> > africann-owner at afrinic.net
>> >
>> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> > than "Re: Contents of AfrICANN digest..."
>> >
>> >
>> > Today's Topics:
>> >
>> > 1. General Manager Public Participation at ICANN leaves comments
>> > (Anne-Rachel Inn?)
>> > 2. Re: 11?me r?union d'Afrinic : L'Afrique appel?e ? songer ?
>> > une meilleure inter connectivit? (media tic)
>> >
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Message: 1
>> > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:14:43 +0000
>> > From: Anne-Rachel Inn? <annerachel at gmail.com>
>> > Subject: [AfrICANN-discuss] General Manager Public Participation at
>> > ICANN leaves comments
>> > To: africann at afrinic.net
>> > Message-ID:
>> > <bd1bfd500911260514l3358942fh9d81cc90d03ba2d2 at mail.gmail.com>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >
>> > All,
>> >
>> > Participation at ICANN has always been an important issue and a lot of
>> work
>> > has been done around how to invlove more people in ICANN processes.
>> > Yesterday was the last day of the GMPP at ICANN, many of you met him,
>> Kieren
>> > McCarthy. Kieren leaves ICANN with some thoughts that you can find
>> > at the following link. and your comments/thoughts are welcome on how to
>> make
>> > ICANN a truly participative place.
>> > http://www.icann.org/en/participate/gmpp-leaving-report-25nov09-en.pdf
>> >
>> > PLEASE POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ICANN BLOG:
>> >
>> http://blog.icann.org/2009/11/report-from-outgoing-gm-public-participation/or
>> > as reply to this mail.
>> >
>> > La participation au niveau de l'ICANN et dans les instances de
>> politiques en
>> > general de l'organisation a toujours ete une preoccupation. c'est meme
>> l'un
>> > des aspects qui est inscrits dans les reglements de l'ICANN. Le
>> Directeur de
>> > la participation a l'ICANN, Kieren McCarthy quitte ICANN et laisse
>> derriere
>> > lui des commentaires sur comment faire evoluer la participation dans ses
>> > travaux. le fichier est anglais mais je pense que tous comprendront. vos
>> > commentaires sont les bienvenus.
>> > http://www.icann.org/en/participate/gmpp-leaving-report-25nov09-en.pdf
>> >
>> >
>> > POSTEZ VOS OPINIONS SUR LE BLOG DE L'ICANN:
>> >
>> http://blog.icann.org/2009/11/report-from-outgoing-gm-public-participation/ou
>> > en retour a ce mail.
>> > --
>> > Anne-Rachel Inne
>> > -------------- next part --------------
>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > URL:
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20091126/5faee0c1/attachment-0001.htm
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > Message: 2
>> > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:30:17 +0100
>> > From: media tic <media.tic01 at gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Re: [AfrICANN-discuss] 11?me r?union d'Afrinic : L'Afrique
>> > appel?e ? songer ? une meilleure inter connectivit?
>> > To: africann at afrinic.net
>> > Message-ID:
>> > <114c48360911260630h11daa9a0v16cb007294387001 at mail.gmail.com>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>> >
>> > Sujet fondamental, que celui de l'adaptation d'internet aux besoins des
>> > Africains. Je pense que cela passe D'ABORD par l'appropriation par les
>> > Africains de l'internet en tant que médium de base. De ce point de vue,
>> il y
>> > a encore tant de choses à faire. Tout doit partir, à mon avis, de
>> politiques
>> > adaptées de la part des pouvoirs publics sur l'ensemble du continent.
>> Sinon,
>> > il n'y aura aucun progrès.
>> >
>> > Gratien KITAMBALA
>> > Directeur de Rédaction
>> > Mensuel Medi at tic
>> > Kinshasa/RDC
>> > http://mediatic.unblog.fr
>> >
>> > 2009/11/26 LO MAMADOU <alfamamadou at hotmail.com>
>> >
>> > > 11éme réunion du registre de l'internet pour l'Afrique: L'Afrique
>> appelée
>> > > à songer à une meilleure inter connectivité
>> > >
>> > > Aïssatou Doucoure
>> > >
>> > > 25 Novembre 2009
>> > > ------------------------------
>> > > « Protéger l'avenir de l'Internet en Afrique : en prévision de la mise
>> en
>> > > oeuvre du protocole ipv6 ». Tel est le thème de la 11ème réunion du
>> registre
>> > > de l'internet pour l'Afrique qui s'est ouverte hier mardi 24 novembre
>> à
>> > > Dakar. Le début de cette rencontre de quatre jours a permis à Adiel
>> > > Akplogan, directeur général d'AfriNic de rappeler aux africains que «
>> Le
>> > > continent africain devrait réfléchir sur la manière d'arriver à un
>> meilleur
>> > > inter connectivité de son réseau Internet et se préparer aux
>> évolutions
>> > > notées dans ce domaine », déclare M. Adiel.
>> > > NTIC - INFORMATIQUE
>> > > AfriNic a organisé la 11ème réunion du registre de l'internet pour
>> > > l'Afrique avec la collaboration de l'Agence de Régulation des
>> > > Télécommunications et des Postes (Artp) dans le cadre de la mission de
>> > > promotion des Tic en général et des Télécommunications en particulier.
>> Cette
>> > > rencontre « permettra à l'ensemble des participants d'apprécier
>> l'étendue
>> > > des avancées technologiques et leur impact socioéconomique et
>> politique sur
>> > > le continent », a annoncé Adiel Akplogan, directeur général d'AfriNic.
>> Cette
>> > > cérémonie qui a eu lieu dans un hôtel de la place hier 24 novembre
>> avait
>> > > pour thème « Protéger l'avenir de l'Internet en Afrique : en prévision
>> de la
>> > > mise en oeuvre du protocole ipv6 ».
>> > > Cette réunion « est présentée comme un appui aux milieux
>> universitaires et
>> > > professionnels en vue d'organiser la réflexion sur les grandes
>> questions
>> > > relatives aux Tic en Afrique telle que la gouvernance de l'Internet »,
>> a
>> > > informé le directeur d'AfriNic. C'est dans cette perspective que « le
>> > > continent africain devrait réfléchir sur la manière d'arriver à un
>> meilleur
>> > > inter connectivité de son réseau Internet et se préparer aux
>> évolutions
>> > > notées dans ce domaine », a renseigné Adiel Akplogan. Selon toujours
>> lui, «
>> > > l'Afrique fait face à un défi éducationnel en relation avec
>> l'utilisation et
>> > > le développement d'Internet ».
>> > > Dans cette mouvance, Nongo Diaw, directeur général de l'Artp déclare :
>> «
>> > > Internet est un médium de communication, et l'Afrique a besoin de
>> former les
>> > > jeunes en particulier à une meilleure utilisation de cet instrument ».
>> Avant
>> > > d'ajouter que la culture de l'Internet « doit être adaptée dès le bas
>> âge
>> > > aux réalités africaines en sensibilisant les pouvoirs publics et les
>> > > utilisateurs, pour une meilleure adaptation à l'Internet de demain ».
>> > >
>> > > source : sud quotidien
>> > >
>> > > > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:13:18 +0200
>> > > > From: africann-request at afrinic.net
>> > > > Subject: AfrICANN Digest, Vol 33, Issue 32
>> > > > To: africann at afrinic.net
>> > > >
>> > > > Send AfrICANN mailing list submissions to
>> > > > africann at afrinic.net
>> > > >
>> > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>> > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> > > > africann-request at afrinic.net
>> > > >
>> > > > You can reach the person managing the list at
>> > > > africann-owner at afrinic.net
>> > > >
>> > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> > > > than "Re: Contents of AfrICANN digest..."
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Today's Topics:
>> > > >
>> > > > 1. New Registrar Agreement Covers Most Registrations
>> > > > (Anne-Rachel Inn?)
>> > > > 2. ICANN November Magazine (Anne-Rachel Inn?)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > > Message: 1
>> > > > Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:38:52 +0000
>> > > > From: Anne-Rachel Inn? <annerachel at gmail.com>
>> > > > Subject: [AfrICANN-discuss] New Registrar Agreement Covers Most
>> > > > Registrations
>> > > > To: africann at afrinic.net
>> > > > Message-ID:
>> > > > <bd1bfd500911250938v1c68675bh19f85b48f064bf3e at mail.gmail.com>
>> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>> > > >
>> > > > News Alert
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-24nov09-en.htm
>> > > > ------------------------------
>> > > > New Registrar Agreement Covers Most Registrations
>> > > >
>> > > > Over 88 percent of domain names covered by new protections
>> > > >
>> > > > 24 November 2009
>> > > >
>> > > > Less than six months after new registrant protections were approved
>> by
>> > > the
>> > > > ICANN Board, over 88 percent of all generic domain names are now
>> covered.
>> > > >
>> > > > The protections include improved ways of storing data that require
>> > > > registration companies to submit to more stringent rules. These are
>> > > included
>> > > > in a revised contract between ICANN and registrars, called the
>> Registrar
>> > > > Accreditation Agreement (RAA).
>> > > >
>> > > > Since the revised RAA was approved on 21 May 2009, 650 registrars
>> have
>> > > > voluntarily agreed to be bound by the new agreement; collectively
>> they
>> > > > represent 88 percent of all generic top-level domains registered. In
>> > > return,
>> > > > those that have signed the new agreement are recognized by ICANN on
>> its
>> > > > listing of accredited companies.
>> > > >
>> > > > Under their existing contract, registrars are not required to sign
>> up to
>> > > the
>> > > > new RAA until their existing agreement ends, but they can
>> voluntarily
>> > > sign
>> > > > up early. The high level of coverage achieved to date is due
>> primarily to
>> > > > these voluntary early adopters.
>> > > >
>> > > > ICANN CEO and President Rod Beckstrom said of the high sign-up rate:
>> “The
>> > > > fact that the vast majority of generic domain names are now covered
>> by
>> > > these
>> > > > protections is a clear sign of the industry’s goodwill and its
>> commitment
>> > > to
>> > > > effective self-regulation - especially since some of these
>> protections
>> > > come
>> > > > at a cost to the companies themselves. It is an extraordinary
>> achievement
>> > > in
>> > > > a very short time.”
>> > > >
>> > > > Some of the additional protections afforded registrants under the
>> new
>> > > > contract include:
>> > > >
>> > > > - Enhanced enforcement tools to assure registrar compliance with
>> ICANN
>> > > > policies
>> > > > - Enhanced data escrow requirements to protect registrants that use
>> > > > privacy or proxy services
>> > > > - A Registrant Rights & Responsibilities document
>> > > > - New requirements placed on resellers
>> > > > - Improved contact information requirements
>> > > > - Registrar required training program
>> > > >
>> > > > “Registrars and the ICANN community successfully collaborated to
>> make
>> > > sure
>> > > > consumers are well protected while respecting the competitive
>> marketplace
>> > > > ICANN has made part of its mandate,” said Mason Cole, Vice President
>> of
>> > > > Oversee.net and chair of the Registrar Stakeholder Group. “It’s
>> > > encouraging
>> > > > to see how quickly and assertively registrars have adopted the terms
>> of
>> > > the
>> > > > new agreement.”
>> > > >
>> > > > As an aid to potential registrants, ICANN has added an indicator on
>> each
>> > > of
>> > > > our public lists of registrars to show which registrars have adopted
>> the
>> > > > 2009 RAA. See:
>> > > >
>> > > > - http://www.internic.net/regist.html
>> > > > -
>> http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accreditation-qualified-list.html
>> > > > - http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accredited-list.html
>> > > >
>> > > > ------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > > *Sign up for ICANN's Monthly Magazine <
>> http://www.icann.org/magazine/>*
>> > > > -------------- next part --------------
>> > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > > > URL:
>> > >
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20091125/f68c27b2/attachment-0001.htm
>> > > >
>> > > > ------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > > Message: 2
>> > > > Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:07:11 +0000
>> > > > From: Anne-Rachel Inn? <annerachel at gmail.com>
>> > > > Subject: [AfrICANN-discuss] ICANN November Magazine
>> > > > To: africann at afrinic.net
>> > > > Message-ID:
>> > > > <bd1bfd500911251407l49752281pc2dae9f4d9850f63 at mail.gmail.com>
>> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>> > > >
>> > > > November 2009 — Volume 2 | Issue 10 In this issue:
>> > > >
>> > > > - Special Seoul Edition
>> > > > - Internationalized Domain Names (IDN's)
>> > > > - New gTLDs
>> > > > - Strategic Planning
>> > > > - Affirmation of Commitments
>> > > > - GNSO Improvements
>> > > > - Independent Reviews
>> > > > - Board Members & Councillors
>> > > > - Board Resolutions
>> > > > - Fellowship Update
>> > > >
>> > > > Special Seoul Edition
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > *WHAT WAS IT?*
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ICANN's 36th international public meeting was the last of three held
>> > > > annually to conduct policy development and outreach. It was hosted
>> by
>> > > ICANN
>> > > > (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) and KISA
>> (Korea
>> > > > Internet & Security Agency), a public agency that plays a major role
>> in
>> > > > developing and researching the Internet in Korea.
>> > > >
>> > > > The meeting was opened by three local dignitaries: Mr. See Joong
>> Choi,
>> > > > chairman of the Korea Communications Commission; Mr. Heung Kil Ko,
>> > > Senator
>> > > > and Chairman of the Culture, Sports, and Tourism, Broadcasting and
>> > > > Communications Committee of the National Assembly; and Ms. Hee Jung
>> Kim,
>> > > > president of KISA.
>> > > >
>> > > > Mr. See Joong Choi spoke about how the Internet was 40 years old,
>> and the
>> > > > impact it has had in that time. He talked about how important IP
>> > > addresses
>> > > > were as assets for the future and that they become a common resource
>> for
>> > > > all. And he welcomed the introduction of IDNs as paving a "new way
>> toward
>> > > > the future".
>> > > >
>> > > > Mr. Heung Kil Ko spoke about how Korea was a leader in the knowledge
>> and
>> > > > information society, with 77.6 percent of its citizens online. He
>> spoke
>> > > of
>> > > > the importance of an efficiently and stably managed IP address
>> system, as
>> > > > well as dealing with security threats such as hacking and phishing.
>> The
>> > > > conference would hopefully lead to close ties between ICANN and
>> Korea, he
>> > > > added.
>> > > >
>> > > > Ms. Hee Jung Kim also heralded the introduction of IDNs, and
>> welcomed a
>> > > > recent change in the agreement that ICANN has with the United States
>> > > > government as strengthening the autonomy of the IP addressing
>> system.
>> > > >
>> > > > There were 1,207 attendees to the conference from 111 different
>> > > countries.
>> > > > The participants engaged in a wide range of discussions about the
>> > > Internet's
>> > > > domain name system and related issues.
>> > > >
>> > > > *WHAT HAPPENED AND WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS? *
>> > > >
>> > > > Many meetings, workshops, public forums and informal discussions
>> were
>> > > held
>> > > > over seven days by the different stakeholders of the ICANN model:
>> > > >
>> > > > - Business interests
>> > > > - Civil society – – including the At-Large Summit of individual
>> Internet
>> > > > user representatives
>> > > > - Governments and government agencies
>> > > > - Internet service providers
>> > > > - Registrants
>> > > > - Registrars
>> > > > - Registries
>> > > > - The technical community
>> > > >
>> > > > Several key issues and themes evolved over the course of the
>> meeting.
>> > > They
>> > > > are summarized in this magazine.
>> > > >
>> > > > Further information about the meeting, including presentations and
>> > > > transcripts, is available at http://sel.icann.org.
>> > > >
>> > > > ICANN's next international public meeting will take place in
>> Nairobi,
>> > > Kenya
>> > > > beginning on 7 March 2010.
>> > > > Internationalized Domain Names (IDN's)
>> > > >
>> > > > *WHAT HAPPENED *
>> > > >
>> > > > The most significant progress at the Seoul meeting was the approval
>> of
>> > > the
>> > > > "fast track", which will see a limited number of internationalized
>> domain
>> > > > names introduced to the Internet's root possibly before the end of
>> the
>> > > year.
>> > > > To celebrate the occasion, a special evening reception was held on
>> the
>> > > > Monday.
>> > > >
>> > > > The fast track was formally approved by the
>> > > > Board<http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-30oct09-en.htm#2
>> >on
>> > > > Friday, and although there remain concerns about their introduction,
>> > > > the
>> > > > Chairman noted it as an historic achievement and the vote was met
>> with a
>> > > > standing ovation by the audience. Dozens of press articles from
>> across
>> > > the
>> > > > world also recognized the event.
>> > > >
>> > > > For the first time, Internet users that speak something other than
>> > > Western
>> > > > languages will be able to represent an entire Internet address in
>> their
>> > > own
>> > > > language.
>> > > >
>> > > > *NEXT STEPS *
>> > > >
>> > > > Applications to the fast track will open on 16 November.
>> > > >
>> > > > *MORE INFORMATION *
>> > > >
>> > > > Official announcement of the approval:
>> > > > http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-30oct09-en.htm
>> > > >
>> > > > Fast track webpage:http://www.icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/
>> > > >
>> > > > Check out the IDN video on our home page: http://www.icann.org/.
>> > > > New gTLDs
>> > > >
>> > > > *WHAT HAPPENED *
>> > > >
>> > > > The third version of the Applicant Guidebook, as well as a range of
>> other
>> > > > papers and explanatory memoranda, were produced for discussion at
>> the
>> > > > meeting. A main session <http://sel.icann.org/node/6739> on the
>> program
>> > > was
>> > > > held on the Monday.
>> > > >
>> > > > In particular, additional work was done on the “overarching issues”
>> that
>> > > > need to be addressed before the introduction of new top-level
>> domains
>> > > (see
>> > > > below for more specific information).
>> > > >
>> > > > ICANN staff revised the deadline to the opening application date for
>> new
>> > > > gTLDs. Instead of giving a date, or quarter, the launch date will be
>> > > > dependent on community efforts to find solutions to the overarching
>> > > issues.
>> > > > This approach prompted some in the community to argue that ICANN
>> needed
>> > > to
>> > > > demonstrate its determination to the process.
>> > > >
>> > > > The result at the end of the week was a compromise solution,
>> approved in
>> > > a
>> > > > Board resolution<
>> > > http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-30oct09-en.htm#5>,
>> > > > that asked staff to look into how to introduce a system for allowing
>> > > > “expressions of interest” to be shown in new gTLDs. That process may
>> > > allow
>> > > > for likely demand to be gauged and provide useful data to move some
>> > > > discussions from theoretical to pragmatic.
>> > > >
>> > > > The Applicant Guidebook is out to public comment until 22 November.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Trademark Protection
>> > > >
>> > > > The issue of how to protect trademarks in the event of a massive
>> > > expansion
>> > > > in the domain name space continued to be an issue of much debate. A
>> > > special
>> > > > session <http://sel.icann.org/node/7116> was held on the Wednesday
>> to
>> > > > discuss the issue.
>> > > >
>> > > > Following public comment on a report produced for the previous
>> meeting in
>> > > > Sydney (the IRT report), possible solutions to the issue were
>> reduced
>> > > from
>> > > > four to two in a staff paper released prior to the meeting. Those
>> > > solutions
>> > > > are: the creation of an IP Clearinghouse, or database of validated
>> > > > trademarks; and a Uniform Rapid Suspension process for use in
>> clear-cut
>> > > > cases of trademark infringement.
>> > > >
>> > > > That paper has been put to the GNSO for review.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Malicious Conduct
>> > > >
>> > > > Two sessions on Monday afternoon addressed the concern that a large
>> > > > expansion of the domain name space will present new opportunities
>> for
>> > > abuse
>> > > > of the DNS, such as phishing, malware, the distribution of illegal
>> > > content,
>> > > > and so on.
>> > > >
>> > > > The broad concern is that with a large number of new companies
>> entering
>> > > the
>> > > > domain name market – both registries and registrars – that there
>> will not
>> > > be
>> > > > sufficient awareness of the problems of dealing with the criminal
>> element
>> > > > online.
>> > > >
>> > > > Summaries of the input received so far on this issue as well as a
>> report
>> > > by
>> > > > ICANN staff with proposed mitigation measures were posted for review
>> > > prior
>> > > > to the meeting and a panel discussion <
>> http://sel.icann.org/node/7116>
>> > > dug
>> > > > further into both.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Security and Stability
>> > > >
>> > > > A session on Wednesday <http://sel.icann.org/node/7084> focused on
>> a
>> > > report
>> > > > that reviewed how the Internet's current systems could scale to
>> > > accommodate
>> > > > new Internet extensions, as well as other security related issues
>> such as
>> > > > the introduction of a more secure form of the current system, called
>> > > DNSSEC.
>> > > >
>> > > > Broadly, there are some concerns that if a large number of
>> extensions
>> > > were
>> > > > introduced to the Internet at the same time, that the systems
>> currently
>> > > in
>> > > > place would not be able to cope.
>> > > >
>> > > > There was some discussion about whether the report effectively
>> > > recommended
>> > > > that new gTLDs would need to be delayed or spread out over time,
>> although
>> > > > there was no agreement on that point and it remains for ICANN's
>> Advisory
>> > > > Committees in this area (RSSAC and SSAC) to review the report,
>> public
>> > > > comments on the issue, and report back to the community.
>> > > >
>> > > > The root scaling report is out for public
>> > > > comment<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#rsst-report>until
>> 29
>> > > > November.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Demand and Economic Analysis
>> > > >
>> > > > Further economic analysis will be commissioned by ICANN in order to
>> > > address
>> > > > outstanding concerns raised following review of the two previous
>> economic
>> > > > studies.
>> > > >
>> > > > *NEXT STEPS *
>> > > >
>> > > > Feedback from the meeting, as well as comments sent to comment
>> periods
>> > > > covering the third version of the Applicant Guidebook and papers
>> related
>> > > to
>> > > > the overarching issues, will be used to produce a fourth version of
>> the
>> > > > guidebook for the Nairobi meeting in March.
>> > > >
>> > > > Staff will review the possibility of introducing a system where
>> potential
>> > > > gTLD applicants are able to provide “expressions of interest” in new
>> > > > Internet extensions in order to help the work move forward more
>> > > effectively.
>> > > >
>> > > > *MORE INFORMATION*
>> > > >
>> > > > The new gTLD program webpage contains the latest information as well
>> as
>> > > > extensive background information on the whole process:
>> > > > http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm
>> > > >
>> > > > Root scaling study session: http://sel.icann.org/node/7084
>> > > >
>> > > > Trademark Protection session: http://sel.icann.org/node/7116
>> > > >
>> > > > Malicious Conduct and new gTLDs session:
>> http://sel.icann.org/node/7117
>> > > >
>> > > > Malicious Conduct and Consumer Protection:
>> > > http://sel.icann.org/node/7288
>> > > >
>> > > > Registry/registrar separation session:
>> http://sel.icann.org/node/7083
>> > > >
>> > > > New gTLD update session:
>> > > > http://sel.icann.org/node/6739.<http://sel.icann.org/node/6739>
>> > > > Strategic Planning
>> > > >
>> > > > *WHAT HAPPENED *
>> > > >
>> > > > ICANN held its first strategic planning session for 2010 on
>> Wednesday
>> > > > morning.
>> > > >
>> > > > The strategic plan is the process by which the organization's
>> priorities
>> > > are
>> > > > mapped out, feedback is received from the community, and all the
>> input is
>> > > > pulled into an Operating Plan, from which the organization's budget
>> is
>> > > > decided and allocated.
>> > > >
>> > > > The session was more interactive than previous years with an online
>> > > survey
>> > > > asking people to rank the importance of various areas of work e.g.
>> > > implement
>> > > > new gTLDs, strengthen accountability, etc.
>> > > >
>> > > > The plan recognized four main areas of focus for ICANN:
>> > > >
>> > > > - Preserve DNS stability and security
>> > > > - Promote competition, trust and consumer choice
>> > > > - Excel in IANA and other core operations
>> > > > - Maintain ICANN's long term role in the Internet eco-system.
>> > > >
>> > > > Within these, no less than 18 projects were highlighted as being of
>> > > > strategic priorities over the next three years.
>> > > >
>> > > > * NEXT STEPS *
>> > > >
>> > > > A draft plan will be drawn up based on community feedback and
>> provided to
>> > > > the Board for review. The plan will then be put out to public
>> comment in
>> > > > early December, with the second set of feedback used to draw up a
>> revised
>> > > > plan to be put before the Board for approval in February 2010.
>> > > >
>> > > > *MORE INFORMATION*
>> > > >
>> > > > Strategic plan session: http://sel.icann.org/node/7103
>> > > >
>> > > > Online survey<
>> > > http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=Auve9xOKvl0YbWhg1NLKmA_3d_3d>
>> > > > GNSO Improvements
>> > > >
>> > > > *WHAT HAPPENED *
>> > > >
>> > > > After years of hard work, the new GNSO Council sat for the first
>> time in
>> > > > Seoul. There are now two main stakeholder groups: Contracted (made
>> up of
>> > > > registries and registrars), and Non-Contracted (made up of
>> commercial and
>> > > > non-commercial interests).
>> > > >
>> > > > A new chair was chosen by both houses – Chuck Gomes – and he will
>> work
>> > > > alongside two new vice-chairs: Olga Cavalli (Non-Contracted) and
>> Stephane
>> > > > van Gelder (Contracted).
>> > > >
>> > > > *MORE INFORMATION *
>> > > >
>> > > > The GNSO Improvements webpage:
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/
>> > > >
>> > > > The GNSO Council session: http://sel.icann.org/node/6708*.*
>> > > > Independent Reviews
>> > > >
>> > > > *WHAT HAPPENED *
>> > > >
>> > > > A number of sessions that covered the review of specific parts of
>> ICANN
>> > > were
>> > > > held during the week.
>> > > >
>> > > > Currently, two bodies are in the implementation phase: GNSO and
>> ALAC. The
>> > > > GNSO process was largely finished with the sitting of the new
>> Council;
>> > > > whereas the ALAC met the Board's Structural Improvements
>> > > > Committee<http://sel.icann.org/node/7183>to discuss the
>> implementation
>> > > > of its changes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Meanwhile, going through the Working Group stage (i.e. just before
>> > > > implementation) there is: the Nominating
>> > > > Committee<http://sel.icann.org/node/7094>;
>> > > > Board <http://sel.icann.org/node/7252>; and SSAC<
>> > > http://sel.icann.org/node/7098>
>> > > > .
>> > > >
>> > > > Other reviews ongoing included: RSSAC (just at the start of the
>> working
>> > > > group period); ccNSO (just about to head into the review process);
>> and
>> > > ASO
>> > > > (terms of reference for its review being drawn up).
>> > > >
>> > > > *NEXT STEPS *
>> > > >
>> > > > The reviews will progress through the clearly defined processes in
>> each
>> > > > case. More sessions will be held in Nairobi to discuss and review
>> that
>> > > > progress.
>> > > >
>> > > > *MORE INFORMATION: *
>> > > >
>> > > > ALAC and Board SIC session: http://sel.icann.org/node/7183
>> > > >
>> > > > Nominating Committee review session: http://sel.icann.org/node/7094
>> > > >
>> > > > Board review session: http://sel.icann.org/node/7252
>> > > >
>> > > > SSAC review session: http://sel.icann.org/node/7098.
>> > > > Board Members & Councillors
>> > > >
>> > > > Since this was ICANN's annual general meeting, there was turnaround
>> in
>> > > Board
>> > > > and Council members.
>> > > >
>> > > > In particular, Roberto Gaetano, Steve Goldstein, Wendy Seltzer and
>> Thomas
>> > > > Roessler left the Board.
>> > > >
>> > > > >From ALAC: Jose Ovidio Salgueiro, Fatimata Seye Sylla, Vanda
>> Scartezini,
>> > > > Nguyen Thu Hue, and Sivasubramanian Muthusamy all ended their terms.
>> > > >
>> > > > >From the GNSO: Tony Harris, Philip Sheppard, Greg Ruth, Tony
>> Holmes, Ute
>> > > > Decker, Cyril Chua, Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza, Maggie
>> Mansourkia,
>> > > Jon
>> > > > Nevett, and Steve Metalitz all left the Council.
>> > > >
>> > > > Special mention was given to leaving GNSO chair Avri Doria and
>> leaving
>> > > > NomCom chair Tricia Drakes.
>> > > >
>> > > > Peter Dengate Thrush was re-elected as chair of the Board, and
>> Dennis
>> > > > Jennings as vice-chair.
>> > > > Board Resolutions
>> > > >
>> > > > The full set of Board Resolutions at the public meeting on Friday
>> can be
>> > > > found online at:
>> > > http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-30oct09-en.htm.
>> > > >
>> > > > A transcript of the meeting can be found at:
>> > > >
>> > >
>> http://sel.icann.org/meetings/seoul2009/transcript-board-meeting-30oct09-en.txt
>> > > >
>> > > > And video recordings of proceedings can be found in two parts at:
>> > > > http://icann.na3.acrobat.com/p77419459/ and
>> > > > http://icann.na3.acrobat.com/p19863704/
>> > > > Fellowship Update
>> > > >
>> > > > My name is Fahd A. Batayneh and I'm Jordanian – home to the Rose
>> City of
>> > > > Petra, one of the new Seven Wonders of the World. I'm a systems
>> engineer
>> > > at
>> > > > Jordan's National Information Technology Center (NITC) – part of the
>> > > > Ministry of Information and Communication Technology (MoICT).
>> > > >
>> > > > My focus is IT consultancy and policy development and I am a key
>> member
>> > > of
>> > > > the team running the DNS mission of dot-jo. I am also an active
>> member of
>> > > > Jordan's IPv6 committee and ENUM committee. I also provide training
>> to
>> > > > university interns. It is thanks to this network that I was asked by
>> my
>> > > > government to represent Jordan within ICANN.
>> > > >
>> > > > I have been involved with ICANN since the Paris meeting in June 2008
>> and
>> > > now
>> > > > sit on no less than four working groups. I am also involved in the
>> Asia
>> > > > Pacific Top-Level Domains (APTLD) organization, the Arabic Domain
>> Names
>> > > and
>> > > > Internet Governance Team (ADNIGT), and the Usage of Arabic Scripts
>> in
>> > > Domain
>> > > > Names Working Group (ASIWG).
>> > > >
>> > > > So how did my involvement in the fellowship program start?
>> > > >
>> > > > On a rainy winter day in February of 2008, I sat down at work and
>> started
>> > > > going through that morning's emails when I was delighted to see one
>> from
>> > > > ICANN congratulating me on being selected to attend the Paris
>> meeting as
>> > > a
>> > > > fellow. I was speechless! To be honest, at first I thought it was a
>> scam,
>> > > > but after a few phone calls I found out it was for real and I was
>> > > extremely
>> > > > happy that it was! It was the beginning of my – hopefully – long
>> lasting
>> > > > adventures with ICANN.
>> > > >
>> > > > At the Paris meeting, I was totally lost since I barely knew anybody
>> and
>> > > > hearing terms such as ccNSO, gNSO, GAC, ALAC, SSAC, RSSAC, and ASO -
>> the
>> > > > ICANN language - was confusing and misleading at first. But with the
>> help
>> > > of
>> > > > ICANN's regional manager to the Middle East, Baher Esmat, I got to
>> know
>> > > some
>> > > > people and soon grew accustomed to the terminology.
>> > > >
>> > > > A few months later, ICANN asked for volunteers to work on two
>> working
>> > > > groups: the Strategic and Operational Planning Interaction
>> Committee, and
>> > > > the Community Wide Working Group on Geographical Regions. I applied
>> to
>> > > both,
>> > > > and with an excellent recommendation from my DNS advisor, I was
>> accepted.
>> > > > Then, in September 2009, the ccNSO announced their need for extra
>> > > volunteers
>> > > > to two ongoing working groups: the Incident Response Working Group,
>> and
>> > > the
>> > > > Joint ccNSO/gNSO IDN Working Group. I was accepted on board with the
>> > > first
>> > > > working group a few days later, but it was not until the Seoul
>> meeting
>> > > that
>> > > > I was informed of my involvement with the later one.
>> > > >
>> > > > Working with these groups, or with any work group established for
>> the
>> > > cause
>> > > > of ICANN and the evolution of the Internet, is done on a volunteer
>> basis
>> > > and
>> > > > can be time consuming, especially during the first steps of
>> producing a
>> > > > preliminary draft charter. But it is also very exciting as you have
>> the
>> > > > opportunity to work with and learn from interesting people who
>> operate
>> > > > different organizations in various ways.
>> > > >
>> > > > Back home, I am very keen to introduce my community to ICANN, and I
>> > > > encourage my colleagues to apply to the fellowship program so that,
>> if
>> > > > successful, they could attend an ICANN meeting and get to know the
>> > > community
>> > > > and how they operate. They can then reflect on what they learned and
>> > > share
>> > > > their learnings with the local community.
>> > > > Upcoming Meetings
>> > > >
>> > > > - December 7-9: Australian IPv6 Summit 2009—Melbourne,
>> Australia—event
>> > > > link http://www.ipv6.org.au/summit/
>> > > > - December 9: ICANN Board Meeting
>> > > > - December 25—31: Closed for the Holidays
>> > > >
>> > > > We Want to Hear From You
>> > > >
>> > > > If you have a comment about an article you've read, want to know
>> more
>> > > about
>> > > > a particular topic, are confused about an acronym, or if you would
>> you
>> > > like
>> > > > to submit an Op-Ed article? We invite you to submit your thoughts,
>> ideas,
>> > > > and feedback to us at: michele.jourdan at icann.org
>> > > > Links
>> > > >
>> > > > *Policy update: *http://www.icann.org/en/topics/policy/
>> > > >
>> > > > *Compliance newsletter:*
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.icann.org/en/compliance/newsletter/
>> > > >
>> > > > *Monthly magazine:*
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.icann.org/en/magazine/
>> > > >
>> > > > *Blog: *http://blog.icann.org/
>> > > >
>> > > > *Announcements:*
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/
>> > > > Participate
>> > > >
>> > > > *HAVE YOUR VOICE HEARD*
>> > > >
>> > > > Visit the Public Participation Site and let us know what you think
>> about
>> > > the
>> > > > current issues.
>> > > >
>> > > > If you care about the Internet and how it evolves, your voice will
>> only
>> > > be
>> > > > heard if you get involved.
>> > > >
>> > > > http://public.icann.org/
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Affirmation of Commitments
>> > > >
>> > > > *WHAT HAPPENED *
>> > > >
>> > > > The Joint Project Agreement (JPA) that ICANN had with the US
>> government
>> > > > concluded in September and was replaced by an Affirmation of
>> Commitments.
>> > > >
>> > > > Under that Affirmation, ICANN becomes accountable to the global
>> Internet
>> > > > community and a series of reviews are outlined that help ensure a
>> high
>> > > > degree of public, global accountability.
>> > > >
>> > > > A special session <http://sel.icann.org/node/7481> was held on the
>> > > Wednesday
>> > > > afternoon where the Chairman and CEO took questions about the
>> Affirmation
>> > > > and also outlined a path forward for carrying out the reviews.
>> > > >
>> > > > The Affirmation was also given an hour-long slot at the public forum
>> on
>> > > > Thursday.
>> > > >
>> > > > *NEXT STEPS *
>> > > >
>> > > > The Affirmation outlines a number of reviews. An initial draft of
>> how
>> > > these
>> > > > might work will be produced following community feedback and
>> presented at
>> > > > the next ICANN meeting in Nairobi.
>> > > >
>> > > > *MORE INFORMATION *
>> > > >
>> > > > The Affirmation of
>> > > > Commitments<
>> > >
>> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-30sep09-en.htm#affirmation
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Affirmation session <http://sel.icann.org/node/7481>
>> > > >
>> > > > To sign up to this and other newsletters, follow this
>> > > > link<http://www.icann.org/en/newsletter/>
>> > > >
>> > > > An archive of magazines can be found here<
>> > > http://www.icann.org/en/magazine/>
>> > > > -------------- next part --------------
>> > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > > > URL:
>> > >
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20091125/07fffb13/attachment.htm
>> > > >
>> > > > ------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > AfrICANN mailing list
>> > > > AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>> > > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > End of AfrICANN Digest, Vol 33, Issue 32
>> > > > ****************************************
>> > >
>> > > ------------------------------
>> > > Vous cherchez l'intégrale des clips de Michael Jackson ? Bing !
>> Trouvez !<http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Michael+Jackson&FORM=MVDE6>
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > AfrICANN mailing list
>> > > AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>> > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>> > >
>> > >
>> > -------------- next part --------------
>> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> > URL:
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20091126/32679726/attachment.htm
>> >
>> > ------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AfrICANN mailing list
>> > AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>> >
>> >
>> > End of AfrICANN Digest, Vol 33, Issue 34
>> > ****************************************
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Vous cherchez l'intégrale des clips de Michael Jackson ? Bing ! Trouvez !<http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Michael+Jackson&FORM=MVDE6>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AfrICANN mailing list
>> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>>
>>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> AfrICANN mailing list
> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AfrICANN mailing list
> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>
>


-- 
SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
COORDONNATEUR SOUS REGIONAL ACSIS/AFRIQUE CENTRALE
MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE

Téléphone mobile:+243998983491/+243999334571
                          +243811980914
email:b.schombe at gmail.com <email%3Ab.schombe at gmail.com>
blog:http://akimambo.unblog.fr
siège temporaire : A/30 Avenue Mponzo,   Q.Matonge, C/Kalamu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20091127/3b54f95c/attachment-0001.htm