[AfrICANN-discuss] on dots and cities
Anne-Rachel Inné
annerachel at gmail.com
Mon May 14 18:21:52 SAST 2007
You are all right in one way or another. The point was to show the
differences ....but also somewhat of the passion about domain names in
general and their perceived or actual marketability.... for best or worse
depending on where you stand.
cheers
ar
On 5/14/07, Calvin Browne <calvin at orange-tree.alt.za> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:19 +0300, Rebecca Wanjiku wrote:
> > i think it also goes along way to demonstrate africa's slumber....
> > we are still grappling with whether to support our ccTLDs while others
> > have moved to cities
> >
> > i will not be surprised that some of us will dash to acquire these
> > domains instead of supporting our own,
> >
> > bex
>
> <my opinions here>
>
> Before you go and believe this rubbish (that .LA is assigned to Los
> Angeles) please have a look at http://www.iana.org/root-whois/la.htm .
>
> Basically, the domain for Lao People's Democratic Republic is being
> marketed to the people of Los Angeles - in a manner that is questionable
> at best, and down right fraudulent as worst.
>
> regards
>
> --Calvin
>
> _______________________________________________
> AfrICANN mailing list
> AfrICANN at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann
>
--
Anne-Rachel Inne
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/africann/attachments/20070514/2adaf35c/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the AfrICANN
mailing list