<html aria-label="message body"><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Hi Paul,<div><br></div><div>Tks for the inputs.</div><div><br></div><div>I think we need to see a written description of the current staff procedure before further decisions.</div><div><br></div><div>I don’t fully agree with the last input from Andrew. Somehow, staff procedures if they are well described, don’t need to become policies, otherwise, we move into an extreme-micro-management. I only see the need for that when the procedure is failing or the community don’t agree. Of course, it means the procedures should be clearly described somewhere.</div><div><br></div><div>Now, regarding your proposed changes, I think the “finally” seems ok to me. What I’m not sure if is this can be incorporated as part of editorial last call changes. To me yes, as it only provides clarity, not changes the intent.</div><div><br></div><div>However, don’t agree in the need of the other change, because in the end, all the CPM is “in accordance to adopted community policy”, not need to state that in every possible place of the manual.</div><div><br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage"><div>
<div>Regards,<br>Jordi<br><br>@jordipalet<br></div>
</div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>El 24 jun 2026, a las 8:59, Paul Hjul <hjul.paul@gmail.com> escribió:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div dir="auto"> Good morning, as presented at the PPM in person I am supportive of the proposal with amendment and object failing amendment. <div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I believe for now 12 months would be acceptable and avoids debate at present with a view to reducing it to 3 months once the appropriate policy amendment kicks in. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I understand that this will move the place of contention but doing so allows a focus on the right issues. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Amendment proposed in bold and italic. Sent from venue on tablet (😬) </div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"> </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">This section shall govern the manner in which AFRINIC assigns, allocates, and administers IPv4 resources during the “Exhaustion Phase”, which phase shall commence upon AFRINIC first assigning or allocating IPv4 address space from the final /8 block of IPv4 resources available to it.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"> Upon the commencement of any Soft-Landing exhaustion phase, such phase shall be deemed final and irreversible. Any IPv4 resources <b><i>finally </i></b>returned or recovered thereafter <b><i>in accordance with adopted community policy</i></b>, irrespective of their size or original pool, shall be returned to the “available space” pool only following a quarantine period of twelve (12) months. AFRINIC may reduce the quarantine period, for example when “available space” is below a /13 or other operational reasons.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">For clarity, “available space” pool is the total addresses available, regardless of being from the last /8, or other blocks.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the provisions of the Soft-Landing framework and any other provision of the CPM relating to allocation criteria, the provisions of the Soft-Landing framework shall prevail to the extent of such inconsistency.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><u><br></u></div><div dir="auto"><u>I am not proposing an amendment to the utilization section but rather pointing out that the policy presupposes this is properly handled in other policies</u></div></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>RPD mailing list<br>RPD@afrinic.net<br>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div><br>**********************************************<br>
IPv4 is over<br>
Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
http://www.theipv6company.com<br>
The IPv6 Company<br>
<br>
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br>
<br>
</body></html>