<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Jordi,</p>
<p>I support the principle very much. Practicality may be a
different story, yes, must implement v6, however:</p>
<p>How do you determine/measure that? I think your "In addition"
section addresses this to a degree.</p>
<p>Merely advertising IPv6 space? Sure, that's easy, but it doesn't
mean I have to actually make that available to customers.</p>
<p>Re proposed text, the word "However, " doesn't add value, merely
"Any IPv4 request must be done with a simultaneous IPv6 request if
the requesting party does not already have IPv6 space."</p>
<p>This does also be the question, it seems 6.5.1.1.3 states that
you must give /48s to end sites - we do distinguish between
business and home users, for business we happily do /48 if so
required (at least we reserve a /48 per site minimum), but for
home users we generally do dynamically allocated /56 (but will
again do /48 on request) - would this imply failure to comply with
your proposed policy? If so, should the proposed policy be
adjusted, or 6.5.1.1.3?</p>
<p>For PI space (6.8.2.2.d) - what does deployed mean?</p>
<div class="moz-signature">
<div style="padding: 0px; margin: 0px; font-family: 'Open Sans';">
<p
style="font-size: large; color: black; padding-left: 10px; padding-top: 3px;">Kind
regards,<br>
Jaco Kroon<br>
<br>
On 2026/05/28 10:28, jordi.palet--- via RPD wrote:</p>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:75E8A336-B72B-4AE6-8EB0-CC25C75AE878@consulintel.es">
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">Hi all,
Somehow this is a response to Sami input on a previous proposal.
This way we can split the problem space in 2 proposals, which may reach consensus without depending one on the other.
So we have a very basic question: If we believe that the members that receive IPv4 out of the Soft Landing policy, must implement IPv6, or not?
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">El 28 may 2026, a las 10:05, Darwin Da Costa <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dacostadarwin@gmail.com"><dacostadarwin@gmail.com></a> escribió:
Dear PDWG,
We have received a new draft policy proposal - IPv6 as a criteria in IPv4 Soft Landing ID AFPUB-2026-v6-001-DRAFT01 from author Jordi Palet Martinez. The proposal contents are published at:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://afrinic.net/afpub-2026-v6-001-draft01">https://afrinic.net/afpub-2026-v6-001-draft01</a>
We encourage you to take some time to go through the proposal contents and provide feedback as follows:
a)Do you support or oppose the proposal?
b) If you oppose the proposal, state your reasons?
c) Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
d) What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
Regards,
Vincent Ngundi & Darwin Da Costa
AFRINIC PDWG Co-Chairs
_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.theipv6company.com">http://www.theipv6company.com</a>
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>