<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hi Jordi,</p>
    <p>Fully agree with everything you say, related proposal.</p>
    <p>Your proposal as is, is good IMHO.</p>
    <p>I suspect it then goes to option (1) below, so if the community
      wants option (2) below someone will have to write the policy
      proposal for that.  Doesn't affect me and I'd love to have IPv4
      for a bit longer for all the practical reasons you stated.  That
      said I do encourage as much IPv6 adoption as I can.<br>
      <br>
      Kind regards,<br>
      Jaco</p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2026/05/21 16:19, jordi.palet--- via
      RPD wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:71E930BC-374C-4747-A490-21393E032A85@consulintel.es">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      Hi Jaco,
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Tks for the inputs.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>I understand your point, and ideally I will be also for “stop
        completely” providing IPv4 addresses, but this is impossible
        while you can do transfers, even if they may happen under the
        table, so not a realistic position.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>In other regions, only newcomers can get new IPv4 addresses,
        but the difference is that in other regions, they don’t have
        anymore any space, so the situation with Afrinic is quite
        different.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>I think we should work in a better use of the recovered
        space, or learning from what happened in other regions with
        policies similar to “soft landing”, have a much better policy,
        but as said, I don’t think this will reach consensus in a short
        time, so meanwhile, let’s clear contradictions in the CPM.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Also note that in Africa, the penetration of Internet is
        still low, unless it changed a lot in the last few years,
        compared to other regions, so having the recovered space in the
        “soft landing” space, seems more appropriate. Note also that the
        other proposal also allows to use some of this “extra” IPv4
        recovered space.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>I think overall, this way to approach what do to with the
        recovered space helps Africa to improve Internet penetration
        tied to IPv6 deployment.</div>
      <div><br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage">
        <div>
          <div>Regards,<br>
            Jordi<br>
            <br>
            @jordipalet<br>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div><br>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div>El 21 may 2026, a las 15:26, Jaco Kroon
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jaco@uls.co.za"><jaco@uls.co.za></a> escribió:</div>
            <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
            <div>
              <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
                content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
              <div>
                <p>Hi Jordi,</p>
                <p>Thanks for raising this.<br>
                  <br>
                  To be clear:  I'm mostly neutral on this.  To a degree
                  I'm of the opinion that the remaining space should
                  just go away so that IPv4 can now go the way of the
                  dodo and those that have not yet deployed IPv6 can
                  remain behind in an eventually disconnected world of
                  their own.  That said ...  "no IPv4 space" makes you
                  the "currently disconnected from reality" service
                  provider - whilst in most cases is possible to
                  overcome by providing services on IPv6-only and using
                  a service like Cloudflare to bridge from IPv4 to IPv6
                  - but that's not always possible for all services. 
                  From the latter perspective I'm in support of what
                  you're saying, but I do thing we're just pro-longing
                  our pain.</p>
                <p>I do thing we also need to urgently address if
                  possible is a policy around how to handle space that's
                  recovered that were leased to AFRINIC members (or
                  entities that could legitimately become AFRINIC
                  members) by the entity from where the space is
                  recovered.<br>
                  <br>
                  I see two options:<br>
                  <br>
                  1.  Lose it.  For some of those entities this could be
                  a death stroke.<br>
                  2.  If the space could be justified as per existing
                  AFRINIC policies, the space (or the portion that can
                  be justified) gets assigned to the AFRINIC member.</p>
                <p>This is aimed towards not penalising downstream
                  customers (presumably innocent) of entities that
                  engaged in policy violating behaviour (not speaking
                  towards guilt/not - that's for others to determine,
                  but it doesn't hurt to prepare for space recovery in
                  the case that that happens).<br>
                  <br>
                  Kind regards,<br>
                  Jaco</p>
                <p> On 2026/05/21 14:45, jordi.palet--- via RPD wrote:</p>
                <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:A6A695CB-A34C-4857-8423-EB01E17F4DDC@consulintel.es">
                  <meta http-equiv="content-type"
                    content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
                  Hi all,
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>I just want to make a short intro to this
                    proposal, aiming to create, hopefully, some
                    discussion.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>This proposal aims to resolve in a single step,
                    most of the conflicts that have been raised by the
                    staff and summarized here:</div>
                  <div><a
href="https://www.afrinic.net/policy/implementation-reports/pier-summary"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.afrinic.net/policy/implementation-reports/pier-summary</a><br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Those conflicts are because the soft landing
                    policy takes over some of the articles in other
                    parts of the CPM.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>This proposal address that by basically stating
                    that in case of conflict, soft-landing articles will
                    have higher priority and actually removing 3
                    articles and rewording one more, to avoid confusion
                    for anyone reading the CPM.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>This is the actual way the staff is doing for any
                    request for IPv4 addresses, so basically, the
                    proposal doesn’t imply changes in the actual
                    evaluation process, just ensuring that there are no
                    misinterpretations or confusions.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Please, let me know if you feel that something is
                    broken or can be improved or whatever.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Note that this proposal doesn’t prevent the
                    community to improve the soft-landing policy, for
                    example regarding what do to with the IPv4 addresses
                    being recovered, but reaching consensus in changes
                    to soft landing, probably can take longer discussion
                    cycles.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Tks!</div>
                  <div><br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage">
                    <div>
                      <div>Regards,<br>
                        Jordi<br>
                        <br>
                        @jordipalet<br>
                        <br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <div><br>
                      <blockquote type="cite">
                        <div>El 15 may 2026, a las 17:46, <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext"
                            href="mailto:dacostadarwin@gmail.com"
                            moz-do-not-send="true">dacostadarwin@gmail.com</a>
                          escribió:</div>
                        <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                        <div>
                          <div>Dear PDWG,<br>
                            <br>
                            We have received a new draft policy proposal
                            - Soft Landing, Recovered Space and
                            Priority, ID AFPUB-2026-IPv4-001-DRAFT01
                             from author Jordi Palet Martinez. The
                            proposal contents are published at:  <br>
                            <br>
                            <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/afpub-2026-ipv4-001-draft01"
                              moz-do-not-send="true">https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/afpub-2026-ipv4-001-draft01</a><br>
                            <br>
                            We encourage you to take some time to go
                            through the proposal contents and provide
                            feedback as follows: <br>
                            <br>
                            a) Do you support or oppose the proposal?<br>
                            b) If you oppose the proposal, state your
                            reasons?<br>
                            c) Is there anything in the proposal that is
                            not clear?<br>
                            d) What changes could be made to this
                            proposal to make it more effective?<br>
                            <br>
                            <br>
                            Regards,<br>
                            Vincent Ngundi & Darwin Da Costa<br>
                            AFRINIC PDWG Co-Chairs.<br>
                            <br>
                            <br>
_______________________________________________<br>
                            RPD mailing list<br>
                            <a
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext"
                              href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                              moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
                            <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                              moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  **********************************************<br>
                  IPv4 is over<br>
                  Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                    href="http://www.theipv6company.com/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
                  The IPv6 Company<br>
                  <br>
                  This electronic message contains information which may
                  be privileged or confidential. The information is
                  intended to be for the exclusive use of the
                  individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty
                  authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
                  the contents of this information, even if partially,
                  including attached files, is strictly prohibited and
                  will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not
                  the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
                  copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
                  information, even if partially, including attached
                  files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a
                  criminal offense, so you must reply to the original
                  sender to inform about this communication and delete
                  it.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
                  <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      **********************************************<br>
      IPv4 is over<br>
      Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.theipv6company.com">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
      The IPv6 Company<br>
      <br>
      This electronic message contains information which may be
      privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
      the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
      non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
      of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
      attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
      criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
      that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
      of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
      is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
      you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
      communication and delete it.<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>