<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Dear Jordi,<div> See my comments in line</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 11:09 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank">rpd@afrinic.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">Hi AK,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">Responding below, in-line.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Regards,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">Jordi<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black">@jordipalet<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt;color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">El 4/7/22, 11:08, "ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE" <<a href="mailto:oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng" target="_blank">oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng</a>> escribió:<u></u><u></u></p></div></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Dear All, <u></u><u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">I would like to object to this policy reaching a consensus for a number of reasons. <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">1. Section 3.4.5. Additionally malfunction of the Board<u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">A. I disagree with this section because I do not think the board should have any additional function. The PDWG should not be subjected to the board in this manner. The Board members are also members of the community and should be free to propose policies just as any other person and not by using additional extra powers. There is already a provision in case there is an emergency. Therefore this seems like an abuse of office. The exceptional emergency is not defined and anything can be adjudged to be an emergency. All you need is for two friends to shout an emergency and it becomes an emergency. <u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] If you read the bylaws, you will find that those already assign to the Board those functions, but with a lot of lack of clarity. That’s simply wrong, and it means the bylaws are encroaching the community. The way to resolve that is either: 1) to fix the bylaws (which is out of scope for the PDWG), 2) ensure that the PDP provides that authorization to the Board (as done in other RIRs) at the same time ensuring that they Board follows also the PDP if an urgent proposal is required and adopted by the Board.</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>[AK] I understand the conflict with the bylaw but as you mentioned there are other ways to fix this. Fixing this way is like putting the board above the community. This should never be. </div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">B "<span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:rgb(255,102,0)">In the event that such Policy Proposal doesn’t reach consensus, it will not be further enforced or implemented, however, any actions taken in terms of the policy up to the non-consensus determination, will remain valid."</span> I totally disagree with this. This has grievous consequences. In addition to my objection in 'A' I think this clause makes it worse. How can such a policy stand? On what basis? So what this means is that the board can take an illegal action and it would stand. <u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] Again, please read bylaws. This is already there. I’m just formalizing it from the perspective of the PDP.</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>[AK] I understand the conflict with the bylaw but as you mentioned there are other ways to fix this. Fixing this way is like putting the board above the community. This should never be. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">2. Section 3.1.1: This section is too vague. There are so many scenarios that could occur and given one example is not just the way to go cos there are many possibilities. The section also refers to the way other RIR reach consensus or Rough consensus without saying which RIR in particular cos there are different ways in which consensus is reached by other RIRs. For example, ARIIN takes actual votes into consideration. then are we saying even when all agree on an issue it would still be "rough consensus" because the document says <span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:rgb(255,102,0)">Consequently, the use of “consensus” in the PDP must be interpreted as “rough consensus”.</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] I disagree that it is vague. It is a very good summary of RFC7282, because we know people doesn’t read it or recall all the details. In fact, this is used in another RIR and has demonstrated that this definition has facilitated the work for the latest years. ARIN is a totally different PDP, and no, it is not based on voting, I think you misunderstood something there. What we use in all the RIRs, same as in IETF is “rough consensus”, however we are used to say “consensus” for short.</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>[AK] I never said ARINis based on vote but they take vote into consideration. I agree with you on rough consensus but in some of our peculiar cases we need consensus. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">3. Section 3.3 . A part of the section says "</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:rgb(255,102,0)">If necessary, taking into consideration the rights of Personal Data Protection, AFRINIC may formally verify the identity of the persons forming part of the PDWG." </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">Are we saying that if not necessary AFRINIC should forgo a fundamental human right to data protection? are we saying AFRINIC can breach the fundamental law on personal data protection if not necessary? This is not possible. The right of personal data protection MUST be protected and not just if necessary. it is not optional.</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] On the other way around. What I’m saying is that *<b>taking into consideration</b>* (so respecting it, validating the info, but not providing it to others).</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>[AK] For section 3.3 The language as written does not tally with your explanation. based on my understanding of english what you have written is the opposite of what you have explained. if you say If necessary that means it would only be taking to consideration when necessary. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">B. Also it reads "</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:rgb(255,102,0)">Typically, most of the work is carried out through the Resource Policy Discussion (RPD) mailing list (<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(255,102,0)">rpd@afrinic.net</span></a>) and the AFRINIC Public Policy Meetings (PPM)." </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">why do we need typically here? is there any other way to carry out the work? </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] It has been clear during the pandemic that we may need other means. So stating “typically” keeps the door open to anything required in the future, without changing what we currently do.</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>[AK] Also I do not see what other options are available using the mailing list covers the pandemic period I don't see any other alternative Therefore <span style="color:rgb(255,102,0);font-family:Roboto;font-size:14px">Typically, most of the work is carried out through the Resource Policy Discussion (RPD) mailing list (</span><a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank" style="font-family:Roboto;font-size:14px"><span style="color:rgb(255,102,0)">rpd@afrinic.net</span></a><span style="color:rgb(255,102,0);font-family:Roboto;font-size:14px">) and the AFRINIC Public Policy Meetings (PPM)." </span><span style="font-family:Roboto;font-size:14px"><font color="#000000">therefore typically is not necessary.</font></span> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">4 Section 3.4.1 : "</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:rgb(255,102,0)">Any PPV must be discussed on the RPD List for a minimum of 8 weeks and maximum, the period of time required so it can be presented in the PPM. Consensus for a Policy Proposal can be determined only once it has been presented and discussed in the PPM."</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black"> This sentence does not make any sense to me ..minimum 8 weeks And maximum what? Something seems missing here. then i do not even understand the remaining part of the sentence. only once ? what does that mean? I does not have any meaning to me. I read it several times to be sure am not thick. </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] The maximum is self-defined: a new proposal must be presented in the meeting. If you submit a proposal 10 weeks before the meeting, then it will be 10 weeks, because the need to be presented before consensus can be determined. If you look at the timelines on my presentation, it is very clear there.</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>[AK) Then the maximum period is not necessary in the document since t can be anything. leaving it that way would lead to confusion to anyone reading it without your explanation and you would not be there to always explain </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">5. Section 3.5.3 " the proposal talked about"rough consensus" in 3.1.1 now it is talking about "consensus" . I was thinking section 3.1.1 say no more use of consensus. Am I wrong?</span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] As said before, we use “consensus” along the text, for short of “rough consensus”. Often we do that in many “legal” or “normative” documents. We define a “short” for a longer expression to make it easier across the rest of the text.</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>[AK] OK I agree but it leadsto confusion</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">6 Section 3.4.4. This section is very dangerous. Are we now saying board members are not part of the PDWG? Why would the board allow for a PPV to reach consensus and now veto it? Why if the board has an objection to the PPV then it must be done when it is being discussed on the mailing list. The board are also part of the PDWG and they have always contributed. The definition of PDWG does not exempt the board. The board cannot be superior to the community. This section is simply saying the board is superior to the community. that the board can wait until when the policy gets to it and then reject it. Why must they wait till that stage. is there any reason for this? If the board has an objection to a policy it must be stated clearly with alternatives when it is being discussed it cannot be at the end. That is a waste of time for the community. </span><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] Again, please read the bylaws. It is already there, just making sura that the PDP is in sync, because we can’t enforce a bylaws amendment. We have been there already, do you remember when you declared consensus in one of my proposals and the Board decided not to ratify it? The Board has the obligation to protect the organization, of course, without encroaching the community.</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>[AK] Yes the board has an obligation but it possible to have a board that would not follow the rules and would want to circumvent the rules by interpreting the rules differently. The past board has attempted this with the help of GOVCOM. Infact the board attempted to extend the seats of some members. If the community diagrees then it should be reversed. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">7. Section 3.5 As we have clearly seen now that the Board itself can be part of the controversy. If the board is now allowed to appoint all members of the AC then it is like a judge in its own case. </span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">I give you a possible scenario based on this proposal. the board submit a proposal as an emergency, the proposal goes through and some object to it and decide to appeal. then the same board now appoints an appeal committee what do you think would happen to that case? I can give more examples. We need to be realistic. </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">The AC should be appointed by the community and it must be a standing committee such that it cannot be reconstituted when an appeal is submitted. that way it would not be a subjective committee. </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt">[Jordi] I’m not saying that all the AC members are “elected” by the AC. I’m saying that the Board is responsible for ensuring that there is an AC. If you read the complete proposal, and you see my presentation, I’m not entering in this proposal in the “elections” part, because I believe this is more complex, and require a completely different proposal (for any kind of elections).</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>[AK] ok but we need clearer language. You wont be there to always explain</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="ES"><div><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12pt"><u></u><u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">8. I think this proposal needs more work.</span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">Thanks </span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Roboto;color:black">AK </span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 11:47 AM PDWG Chair <<a href="mailto:vincent@ngundi.me.ke" target="_blank">vincent@ngundi.me.ke</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p></div><blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm"><div><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Dear PDWG,</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">This is to announce the official start of the last call period for the proposal(in line with the provisions of the CPM).</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Update of PDP</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">AFPUB-2021-GEN-002-DRAFT03</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2021-gen-002-d3" target="_blank"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(17,85,204)">https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2021-gen-002-d3</span></a><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">The proposal reached rough consensus at the AFRINIC-35 Public Policy Meeting held 1-2 June 2022 in hybrid format. This last call period will run for a period of three weeks and close on 14th July 2022. The community is encouraged to conduct a final review of the proposal in this period.</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Regards,</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Vincent Ngundi and Darwin Da Costa</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><b><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">AFRINIC PDWG Co-Chairs</span></b><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><p style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">[Francais]</span><u></u><u></u></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Cher PDWG AFRINIC,</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Il s'agit d'annoncer le début officiel de la dernière période d'appel à propositions (conformément aux dispositions du CPM).</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Mise à jour du PDP</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">AFPUB-2021-GEN-002-DRAFT03</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2021-gen-002-d3" target="_blank">https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2021-gen-002-d3</a></span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">La proposition a atteint un consensus approximatif lors de la réunion de politique publique AFRINIC-35 qui s'est tenue les 1er et 2 juin 2022 dans un format hybride. Cette dernière période d'appel durera trois semaines et se terminera le 14 juillet 2022. La communauté est encouragée à procéder à un examen final de la proposition au cours de cette période.</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12pt;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Sincères amitiés</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Vincent Ngundi et Darwin Da Costa</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><b><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Coprésidents du PDWG</span></b><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12pt;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">[Arabic]</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">عزيزي AFRINIC PDWG ،</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">هذا للإعلان عن البداية الرسمية لآخر فترة دعوة للمقترح (بما يتماشى مع أحكام CPM).</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">تحديث PDP</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">AFPUB-2021-GEN-002-DRAFT03</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2021-gen-002-d3" target="_blank">https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2021-gen-002-d3</a></span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12pt;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">وصل الاقتراح إلى إجماع تقريبي في اجتماع السياسة العامة AFRINIC-35 الذي عقد في 1-2 يونيو 2022 بتنسيق مختلط. ستستمر فترة الاتصال الأخيرة هذه لمدة ثلاثة أسابيع وتنتهي في 14 يوليو 2022. يتم تشجيع المجتمع على إجراء مراجعة نهائية للاقتراح في هذه الفترة.</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12pt;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">أطيب التحيات</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">فنسنت نغوندي وداروين دا كوستا</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><b><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">الرؤساء المشاركون PDWG</span></b><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12pt;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">[Portuguese]</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Caro AFRINIC PDWG,</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Isto é para anunciar o início oficial do último período de chamada para a proposta (de acordo com as disposições do CPM).</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Atualização do PDP</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">AFPUB-2021-GEN-002-DRAFT03</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black"><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2021-gen-002-d3" target="_blank">https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2021-gen-002-d3</a></span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">A proposta alcançou um consenso aproximado na Reunião de Políticas Públicas AFRINIC-35 realizada de 1 a 2 de junho de 2022 em formato híbrido. Este último período de chamada será executado por um período de três semanas e terminará em 14 de julho de 2022. A comunidade é incentivada a realizar uma revisão final da proposta neste período.</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Atenciosamente</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Vincent Ngundi e Darwin da Costa</span><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;margin-left:35.4pt"><b><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:black">Copresidentes do PDWG</span></b><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12pt;margin-left:35.4pt"><span style="color:black"><br style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><br></span><u></u><u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">_______________________________________________<br>RPD mailing list<br><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><u></u><u></u></p></blockquote></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:14.5pt">Website</span></a><span style="font-size:14.5pt">, <a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin" target="_blank">Weekly Bulletin</a> <a href="http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" target="_blank">UGPortal</a> <a href="https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" target="_blank">PGPortal</a> <a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/more-resources/e-notices/6845-how-to-resolve-email-portal-login-problems-for-staff-and-students" target="_blank">HelpDesk</a></span><u></u><u></u></p></div><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><u></u> <u></u></p></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a> <u></u><u></u></p></div><br>**********************************************<br>
IPv4 is over<br>
Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
<a href="http://www.theipv6company.com" target="_blank">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
The IPv6 Company<br>
<br>
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
<br>
<div><a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng" style="font-size:1.3em" target="_blank">Website</a><span style="font-size:1.3em">,</span><span style="font-size:1.3em"> </span><span style="font-size:1.3em"><a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin" target="_blank">Weekly Bulletin</a> <a href="http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" target="_blank">UGPortal</a> <a href="https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" target="_blank">PGPortal</a> <a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/more-resources/e-notices/6845-how-to-resolve-email-portal-login-problems-for-staff-and-students" target="_blank">HelpDesk</a></span></div><div><br></div>