Dear PDWG,<div><br></div><div>Hope this email finds you in good health!</div><div>Please see my comments below, inline...<br><br>Le jeudi 21 avril 2022, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net">rpd@afrinic.net</a>> a écrit :<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Chair,<br>
<br>
(copied my original email so the thread can be properly followed)<br>
<br>
Tks for your quick response. However ...<br>
<br>
Is not only an AC question. If they take a decision on the appeals (at least the one on the proposal that expires mid-may) in the next few days, will the Board be able to meet to ratify that proposal (in case the appeal fails)?<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi Jordi,</div><div><br></div><div>You are doing a good follow-up, brother. </div><div>Thanks for you email.</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If the AC decision will be too late for the Board to ratify the policy proposal before expires, we must know it *in advance* as we must take decisions</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>How the PDWG could know it in advance? Or any one :-/</div><div>...and which decisions the PDWG must take?</div><div><br></div><div>Please clarify, brother.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> before the timings will disallow taking actions before the next PPM (for example, if the option to publish a new version without changes is acceptable </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>OK! but you don't need a permission to do exactly this :-/</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">- which may imply the agreement of the PDWG chairs - we can't miss also the relevant deadline before the PPM).<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jordi, i understand the timing problem you are </div><div>raising; but what can be done, right now?</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
So, we definitively need a *very urgent* response from all the involved parties:<br>
- AC<br>
- Board<br>
- PDWG chairs</blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>...i expect no addition from their comments. You </div><div>know the truth and you know how to fix the issue </div><div>you discovered...why do you want to set a preceding?</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
- Staff (on the interpretation of the CPM timings on this case)<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>An "interpretation" for what purpose?</div><div><br></div><div>The running version (v1.6) of the CPM is clearly </div><div>lacking a policy to properly handle the issue you actually described very precisely. There we are... </div><div>and it's fine that we have had the opportunity to finally discover it. Sure, we are not perfect!</div><div><br></div><div>Time to fix, then?</div><div> </div><div>...a Draft Policy Proposal (DPP) content could be something like the following text:</div><div><br></div><div><DPP_Formulation_for_the_CPM></div><div>Notwithstanding the PDP and the normal lifecycle of a DPP, when the PDWG's Appeal Committee confirms that a DPP is under an appeal; the counter measuring the lifecycle of that DPP is automatically stopped. Its counter is automatically released when the PDWG's AC publishes a final determination about that appeal.</div><div></DPP_Formulation_for_the_CPM></div><div><br></div><div>...under CC0!</div><div><br></div><div>Shalom,</div><div>--sb.</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Regards,<br>
Jordi<br>
@jordipalet<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
El 21/4/22, 12:39, "<a href="mailto:chair@afrinic.net">chair@afrinic.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:chair@afrinic.net">chair@afrinic.net</a>> escribió:<br>
<br>
Dear Mr Palet,<br>
<br>
The Board of Directors met yesterday and appointed a Policy <br>
Development Appeal Committee.<br>
<br>
Updates to the web page is a day to day matter.<br>
<br>
I'll defer to the Policy Development Appeal Committee on the other <br>
questions as those questions may fall under its purview.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
S. Moonesamy<br>
<br>
Board Chair, AFRINIC<br>[...]</blockquote></div><br><br>-- <br><p>Best Regards !<br>__<br>baya.sylvain[AT cmNOG DOT cm]|<<a href="https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure">https://cmnog.cm/dokuwiki/Structure</a>><br>Subscribe to Mailing List: <<a href="https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/">https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/</a>><br>__<br>#LASAINTEBIBLE|#Romains15:33«Que LE #DIEU de #Paix soit avec vous tous! #Amen!»<br>#MaPrière est que tu naisses de nouveau. #Chrétiennement<br>«Comme une biche soupire après des courants d’eau, ainsi mon âme soupire après TOI, ô DIEU!»(#Psaumes42:2)<br><br></p>