<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Dear PDWG</p>
<p>The authors of the proposal Policy Proposal: PDP Working Group
(WG) Guidelines and Procedures submitted an updated version to
the mailing list and the PDWG Chairs on 10 Nov 2021. <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013898.html"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2021/013898.html</a>
refers. The authors received an acknowledgement that their
proposal will be processed and published on the website. <br>
</p>
<p>The communication of the ID & link to the proposal on the
website was only done on 15 Nov 2021 to the mailing list.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Policy Liaison Team<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/11/2021 13:48, JORDI PALET
MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:35C70356-9C0A-4A10-BFF8-8459A9BC6064@consulintel.es">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Last but not least, 3.4.2 of the *<b>actual</b>*
PDP indicates “No change can be made to a draft policy within
one week of the meeting”, and this version was submitted,
according to the authors email outside of that time frame, so
it shall not be considered for this PPM. I’ve no problem on
accepting that, however, then, how we can say next time other
authors, of another proposal that they missed the deadline? Is
that acceptable?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
AFRINIC Policy Liaison.
t: +230 403 51 00 | f: +230 466 6758 | tt: @afrinic | w:www.afrinic.net
facebook.com/afrinic | flickr.com/afrinic | youtube.com/afrinicmedia</pre>
</body>
</html>