<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hi Owen</p>
    <p>With all due respect, my view is that your contrariety to the
      current AfriNic's Board composition and positions is poisoning
      your capacity to separate things that are important when building
      policies in PDWG.</p>
    <p>I am of the believe that when we build a new policy here in PDWG
      that is for long term lasting, for the system to work as it should
      and regardless which is the current Board composition. Good
      policies will last, Board members will pass and as long the those
      policies work in a balanced way and protects the process and
      community from politicization that is always a good thing to have.
      We cannot build policies based on specific individuals.</p>
    <p>Fernando<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/11/2021 15:26, Owen DeLong wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:DE42398D-06F8-4C92-BF20-924877E95A51@delong.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
      </div>
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
        <blockquote type="cite">On Nov 15, 2021, at 05:33, Fernando
          Frediani <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fhfrediani@gmail.com"><fhfrediani@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div dir="auto">Hi
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">No, I am considering it to be elected even
              before a request for recall is put.</div>
            <div dir="auto">Election for such thing only has the
              potential to mess up things a lot and is uncessary.</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      How so?  If the committee is elected before the co-chairs are
      identified, how does it mess things up?
      <div><br>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="auto">
              <div dir="auto">The actual method with the Board playing
                the role in choosing these people to conduct this
                important task is good and balanced enough for the
                process.</div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        This presumes we can depend on the board acting in good faith
        and not appointing committee members based on their willingness
        to achieve the board’s desired outcome. Given that there is a
        clear track record of increasing power grabs (e.g. the
        restructuring of the appeal committee TOR) in the PDP from the
        AFRINIC board, this is obviously folly. </div>
      <div><br>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="auto">
              <div dir="auto">As a comparison there are other RIRs like
                LACNIC where this works similarily and well.</div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        The LACNIC board has and has earned the trust of the community. </div>
      <div><br>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="auto">
              <div dir="auto">Let's not politicize the process which
                should be based in merit and not popularity and imune to
                economical power interference.</div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        Giving control of the process to the board will politicize it.
        The question is whether we want to politicize it in the control
        of 9 people or handle it with broader community oversight. </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Owen</div>
      <div><br>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="auto">
              <div dir="auto"><br>
              </div>
              <div dir="auto">Regards</div>
              <div dir="auto">Fernando</div>
            </div>
            <br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 15 Nov 2021,
                07:12 Owen DeLong, <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">owen@delong.com</a>>
                wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                <div
                  style="word-wrap:break-word;line-break:after-white-space"><br>
                  <div><br>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <div>On Nov 14, 2021, at 18:18 , Fernando Frediani
                        <<a href="mailto:fhfrediani@gmail.com"
                          target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          class="moz-txt-link-freetext">fhfrediani@gmail.com</a>>
                        wrote:</div>
                      <br>
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <p>No way a Recall Committee to be elected by
                            the PDWG. This sounds like a quiet bad
                            scenario and should be avoided given the way
                            PDWG works.</p>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                    They should be elected to serve terms in case a
                    recall comes up. They should not be elected after
                    the recall process has begun.</div>
                  <div>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <p>Recall Committee is a rather critical thing
                            in the structure of PDWG and may only be
                            called up during difficult and stressful
                            times. If you add up the possibility to
                            politicize the process with candidates and
                            an election it a recipe to mess up the
                            process with all that is involved in a
                            election. Further to that imagine the
                            possibility of someone economically powerful
                            that is dissatisfied with some of the
                            decision of the Co-Chair to pay people to
                            subscribe to list, fake participation and
                            vote for certain people for a 'ordered'
                            Recall Committee to remove those 'unwanted'
                            Co-Chairs ?<br>
                          </p>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                    It sounds like you are assuming an election to take
                    place after the recall process is started. That
                    would, indeed, be obvious folly, but it is not what
                    I am proposing.</div>
                  <div>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <div>
                        <div>
                          <p> Having the Board to nominate the Committee
                            is good enough and protects these rather
                            difficult and critical  situations from
                            unnecessary politicization and the PDWG from
                            a easier take over. I believe it is quiet
                            fair to think that the Board has all the
                            necessary attributes to find and choose the
                            right people to compose a Recall Committee
                            when it is needed. We have a great example
                            in the excellent and detailed work a
                            previous Recall Committee has done and those
                            members were all chosen by the Board. This
                            shows the process worked well, fairly and in
                            a balanced way where the Board and Recall
                            Committeed played its role in the balance
                            the PDWG has to have.</p>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                    I disagree… This is a place where we should not be
                    allowing the bard to put their thumbs on the scale,
                    let alone encouraging it.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Owen</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
            <span>RPD mailing list</span><br>
            <span><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a></span><br>
            <span><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a></span><br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>