<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="color:#3d85c6"><div class="gmail_default"><div class="gmail_default"><font size="4">I am sending my congratulations to TISPA for showing the way. This has been our spirit since then, we will always be there for any initiative designed to impact African Independence and to be specific in the support of AFRINIC.</font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font size="4"><br></font></div><div class="gmail_default"><font size="4">"<span style="color:rgb(179,9,9);font-weight:700;font-family:"Fira Sans","Fira Sans"">The role of Tanzania in fostering African Liberation movements</span></font></div><p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0px 0px 10px;line-height:1.5;color:rgb(32,34,32);font-family:"Fira Sans","Fira Sans""><font size="4">The emergence of organised popular liberation movements throughout Africa following the end of the Second World War was a crucial factor in achieving independence for many African countries. Tanzania played an important role in assisting these movements and acted as a consistent opponent of colonial rule in Africa. In particular, Julius Nyerere – the architect of Tanzania’s independence and the country’s first President – was a key figure in the struggle against foreign domination, and helped to popularise the concept of Pan-African unity.<span class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(61,133,198)">"</span></font></p><p style="color:rgb(34,34,34);box-sizing:border-box;margin:0px 0px 10px;line-height:1.5;font-family:"Fira Sans","Fira Sans""><font size="4"><span class="gmail_default" style="color:rgb(61,133,198)"></span><font color="#3d85c6"><span class="gmail_default">Africa should remember, there are still many Julius Nyerere in Tanzania. We stand with Afrinic and we will be against anyone supporting any movement to negatively impact the operation of AFRINIC. Read, </span><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">The African Network Information Centre (AFRINIC) is<span class="gmail_default"> a</span></span><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"> Regional Internet Registry (RIR) for Africa and the Indian Ocean region, AFRINIC is responsible for the distribution and management of Internet number resources<span class="gmail_default">.</span></span></font></font></p>Regards,</div></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><font size="4">---</font></div><div dir="ltr"><font size="4">MATOGORO Jabhera<br></font><div><div dir="ltr"><font size="4"><font color="#444444"></font><span><font color="#444444"></font><font color="#000000">Assistant Lecturer and Coordinator for Research & Publication</font></span></font></div><div dir="ltr"><font size="4" color="#000000">Department of Computer Science and Engineering</font></div><div dir="ltr"><font size="4" color="#000000">College of Informatics and Virtual Education</font></div><div dir="ltr"><font size="4" color="#000000">The University of Dodoma</font></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:large">Website: <span style="color:rgb(61,133,198)"><a href="http://www.udom.ac.tz" target="_blank">www.udom.ac.tz</a> </span></span><br></div></div></div><div dir="ltr"></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 3:42 PM Jaco Kroon <<a href="mailto:jaco@uls.co.za">jaco@uls.co.za</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Hi All,<br>
<br>
</p>
I believe that it's plain that AFRINIC was established for the
benefit of the African continent, this is even enshrined in the
by-laws, as detailed in section 3.4. I believe sub-point (i)
summarises it quite well:
<p><i>(i)to provide the service of allocating and registering
Internet resources for the purposes of enabling communications
via open system network protocols and to assist in the
development and growth of the Internet in the </i><i><b>African</b></i><i>
region; [emphasis added]</i></p>
<br>
<p>I won't quote the rest of it here, but the rest of the section is
equally relevant (<a href="https://afrinic.net/bylaws#b20-3" target="_blank">https://afrinic.net/bylaws#b20-3</a>)
and makes it plain that everything AFRINIC does should be for the
benefit of the African continent (region). Even the *membership*
is based on this regional affinity:</p>
<p><i>MEMBERSHIP - 6.1</i><i><br>
</i><i> Membership shall be open to:</i><i><br>
</i><i> (i) any Person [including non-natural persons eg
companies] who is <b>geographically based within</b>, and <b>providing
services in the African region</b>, and who is engaged in the
use of, or business of providing, open system protocol network
services;</i></p>
<p>That is - the member is based in the AFRINIC region. This
applies to all three classes of members (Registered, Resource and
Associate).</p>
<p>It is also implied here that the resources are for use within the
African continent. </p>
<p>Over the last while it's become apparent that many people are
extremely unhappy about the fact that Afrinic resources are being
used off-continent. Based on the above I think it's a fair
assumption/expectation (as well as appropriate) that at least the
majority of issued resources should be used in-region (In
particular IPv4 resources).<br>
</p>
<p>I believe it to be appropriate at this time to state this as
policy in the CPM, and thereby to make the general sentiment I've
seen plain as day. This should then apply to all issued resources
retrospectively as well. Not only newly issued resources (which
is currently already dealt with from the soft landing policy).<br>
</p>
<p>I request from the community opinions on the following:</p>
<p> 1. If you had to assign a percentage to out-of-region use, what
percentage of resources allocated from AFRINIC would be considered
"fair usage" for out of region use (I'm thinking "At least 50% of
issued resources should be used in-region", or then "less than 50%
of resources may be used out-of-region"); and</p>
<p> 2. Assuming that a policy gets passed to enforce some form of
in-region use - what would be an acceptable amount of time to
provide members to comply (I'm thinking either 6 or 12 months,
definitely no longer than 18 unless someone can justify that
sensibly) with respect to existing resources?</p>
<p>You're welcome to differentiate between different types of
resources (for example, I don't think it makes sense to have to
get a separate AS number just because a company is
multi-continent, so here as long as the AS is also used
in-region). Space on v6 is of such a nature that I'm inclined to
say "who cares".<br>
</p>
<p>Currently the only restriction in the CPM regarding resource
usage relates to IPv4 during soft-landing (<a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/manual#Soft-Landing" target="_blank">https://afrinic.net/policy/manual#Soft-Landing</a>
relating specifically to the last /8. The fact that this can just
be used in-region and then move other existing resources
out-of-region is of concern to me and this is part of the
"problem" I'd like to address in a policy update.<br>
</p>
<p> </p>
<div>
<p>Kind Regards,<br>
Jaco Kroon<br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</blockquote></div>