<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Thank you Eddy.</p>
<p>I agree with you.<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/8/21 11:05 AM, Eddy Kayihura
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:043201d72c56$5cf7eb00$16e7c100$@afrinic.net">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style>@font-face
{font-family:Wingdings;
panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:"Baskerville Old Face";
panose-1:2 2 6 2 8 5 5 2 3 3;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
{mso-style-priority:34;
margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm;
margin-bottom:0cm;
margin-left:36.0pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}p.gmail-m8277360860416948725msolistparagraph, li.gmail-m8277360860416948725msolistparagraph, div.gmail-m8277360860416948725msolistparagraph
{mso-style-name:gmail-m_8277360860416948725msolistparagraph;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif;
color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}ol
{margin-bottom:0cm;}ul
{margin-bottom:0cm;}</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="EN-US">[French
Below]<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">Dear PDWG,</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black"> </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.5pt;font-family:"Baskerville Old
Face",serif;color:#1D1C1D;background:#F8F8F8">I have
been reading your exchanges with much interest and </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old
Face",serif;color:black">allow me to share my thoughts
on the matter here.</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black"> </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">I trust the previous
Co-chairs to be men of their words.</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black"> </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">I trust my team that was
tasked to investigate the logs and came back empty-handed.</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black"> </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">I trust myself and my
fellow Board members who have all confirmed that they have
not received such an email.</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black"> </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">I also trust that the PDWG
realise that there is a process in place that must be
followed and hiding an email does not derail the process. </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old
Face",serif;color:black"> </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">So, as a constructive way
forward, I suggest the following:</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black"> </span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">A) Can the previous
Co-chairs kindly forward the reports in question to the RPD
list so that they are on public record?</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">B) Once the new
Co-chairs are in place, the PDWG agrees on how to move
forward with the documents;</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">C) We go back to
discussing the issue at hand as indicated by the subject of
this thread.</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">Eddy Kayihura</span><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black">CEO AFRINIC<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR">#######<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR">Cher PDWG,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR">Je lis avec
intérêt les divers échanges et permettez-moi de partager mes
idées sur ce sujet.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR">J’ai confiance
que les anciens Co-chairs tiennent leur parole.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR">J’ai confiance
en mon équipe qui a analysé les logs et n’y ont rien trouvé.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR">J’ai confiance
en moi-même et aux mes collègues du Board qui ont tous
confirmés ne pas avoir reçu cet email.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR">J’ai aussi
confiance que les PDWG réalise que nous avons des procédures
en place et que cacher un email ne peut en aucun cas
dérailler la procédure.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR">Je fais donc la
proposition suivante dans le but d’évoluer d’une manière
constructive :<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif;color:black" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" type="A" start="1">
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"
lang="FR">Est-ce que les Co-chairs précédents peuvent
renvoyer les rapports en questions sur la liste RPD and
qu’ils deviennent public ?<o:p></o:p></span></li>
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"
lang="FR">Des que les nouveaux Co-chairs seront en
position, le PDWG pourra s’accorder sur la procédure a
suivre avec ces documents ;<o:p></o:p></span></li>
<li class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:0cm;mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span
style="font-family:"Baskerville Old Face",serif"
lang="FR">Nous continuons a discuter sur le sujet qui est
bien référencé dans le titre de l’email.<o:p></o:p></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif" lang="FR">Cordialement,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif" lang="FR"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif" lang="FR">Eddy Kayihura<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Baskerville
Old Face",serif" lang="FR">CEO AFRINIC<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Baskerville Old
Face",serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US" lang="en-MU"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Baskerville Old
Face",serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US" lang="en-MU"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
lang="EN-US"> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"><rpd@afrinic.net></a> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, 8 April 2021 12:28<br>
<b>To:</b> rpd <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"><rpd@afrinic.net></a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [rpd] PDWG Co-Chairs Selection
pursuant to Section 3.3 of CPM |<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Hi Noah,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">I think we are mixing up things here. Long
email, but I think is important to understand this thread.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">I was talking “in general”, not about any
specific policy proposal.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">So, when I say that the chairs can’t judge the
impact analysis as part of the determination of consensus, I
mean in “any” policy proposal. The PDP doesn’t state
anything about that, among other reasons, because that will
break what it means consensus. Consensus is determined by
objections of the community. If the community believes that
the impact analysis is correct, the community can object to
a policy based on that.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">However, the community can also ignore the
impact analysis, because a) they don’t think is correct, or
b) they simply decide that it is not a community relevant
issue.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">For example, an impact analysis may consider
that a policy *<b>if implemented</b>* in time frame “x” or
using method “y”, can be dangerous for the organization.
However, the community may believe that this is resolved by
implementing the policy in phases, or “3x”, and/or using
method “z”.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">This can happen because the impact analysis
comes late (which happened many many many times) and the
staff has not considered other choices, or just because the
community discovers a better way to do things than the staff
(more people, more eyes and brains to look into a problem
and provide possible solutions). It can also happen because
the staff is interpreting something in the policy in the
wrong way and gets clarified in the policy meeting, which
happened also several times.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">In addition to that, the board could *<b>also</b>*,
when working in the policy ratification, believe that there
are alternative ways to do it, or balance between the
benefits and the cost, etc. In fact, even could happen in
the other way around: the impact analysis may be “ok” for a
proposal, reach consensus and later on, the board in the
ratification find something that is not good.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">To put all this in context, we shall remember
that a policy doesn’t state, the implementation timing and
in general, should avoid implementation/operational details,
but that doesn’t preclude a proposal, authors or community
to provide inputs or hints on all that.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US">Yes, the
PDWG should be responsible when evaluating proposals and
that means *<b>ALSO</b>* to look at the impact analysis
“with a grain of salt” (and I personally always read and
discuss the anlysis impact of every proposal as it is very
helpful). We have the right to disagree or even ignore it.
The community good doesn’t neccesarily match 100% with the
organization good, and in terms of policies the community
decision is *<b>on top</b>* of the organization. The board
has the right to object if they can justify that. Is part
of their work. The board members are also community
members and they could, if they find something really
“bad”, bring that to the discussion (speaking in their
personal capacity) before it reaches consensus. I’m
convinced that nobody has honestly interest to “delay” a
proposal (either to reach consensus or to not-reach it, or
to ratify it or to not-ratify it), so as sooner as all the
points come to the table, much better.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US">We also
shall remember that the board could be wrong and their
decision about a ratification, can also be discussed by
the organization membership, and that’s why, if this
happens, the community which includes the membership, can
always, have the same topic of a policy on the discussion
table again.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US">I feel
that the cases where the board stops a policy should be
very very very strange, and this is why in the history of
the 5 RIRs, I recall only a couple of cases. There is
nothing wrong on that. There should be a good balance
between community and organization protection.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US">Now,
coming to the inter-RIR proposal under appeal (and the
other 2), when each proposal has been presented and in the
meetings were they have been discussed, I was the first
one telliing 2 out of 3 of the proposals are
non-reciprocal, and asked the authors and staff to verify
with the other RIRs. I was even insulted because I was
asking that. However finally, when that was done (after 2
meetings, unfortunatelly, so we lost a LOT of time), the
conclusion was that I was completely right.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US">So this
proves that the impact analysis of 2 proposals missed a
key point, because a non-reciprocal policy means that the
benefit of the inter-RIR transfers is lost. As said before
an analysis impact is very helpful and we should always
push for having it ASAP, but we should not take it
“literally” or as a “must”. In fact in other RIRs, it is *<b>clearly
stated</b>* in the analysis impact that it is the
“staff” view and not neccesarily a “final true” or
“mandatory recommendations” neither for or against the
proposal.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">Jordi<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">@jordipalet<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">El 7/4/21 21:48, "Noah" <<a
href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz" moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a>>
escribió:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">For your other responses, we can revisit
them with a DPP in the near future, however.....<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:33 PM JORDI PALET
MARTINEZ via RPD <<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:35.4pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="ES"> </span><span
lang="ES"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:70.8pt"><span
lang="EN-US">in order to protect the Org but
what is puzzling to me is co-chairs ignoring not
only WG valid objections but also staff impact
analysis and forge ahead with a recommendation
for ratification of a proposal that would impact
the Organization.</span><span lang="ES"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:35.4pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"> </span><span
lang="ES"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p
class="gmail-m8277360860416948725msolistparagraph"
style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:Wingdings"
lang="EN-US">è</span><span
style="font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times
New Roman",serif" lang="EN-US"> </span><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US">I don’t
agree here. The chairs can’t judge the impact
analysis if the community decides to ignore it </span><span
lang="ES"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">In this case, the community aka the PDWG did
not ignore the staff impact analysis. In fact resource
members even tasked AFRINIC member services to
feedback on the Impact of e.g the Resource Transfer
Proposal. Participants in this working group including
myself have repeatedly pointed to the staff impact
analysis of the transfer proposals and to a lesser
extent the board prerogative proposal. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">The fact is that a number of members of the
PDWG who have participated in the discussions have
never ignored the impact analysis which is why some
requested the policy liaison to seek further clarity
on the valid issues of reciprocity while others tasked
the member services to feedback on financial impact to
the Org.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p
class="gmail-m8277360860416948725msolistparagraph"
style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US">(or not
trust it, or believe is wrong, or whatever).
I’ve seen several “wrong” impact analysis in
several RIRs, and this is only proved if the
policy is allowed to go thru. </span><span
lang="ES"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">In my case and that of few I know, in fact
trust the staff impact analysis to be valid and
serious for the case of resource transfer policy and
am not sure if folks ever took time to go through the
analysis here; <a
href="https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d3#impact"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d3#impact</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p
class="gmail-m8277360860416948725msolistparagraph"
style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US">However,
if the organization is put in risk, that’s why
the PDP should ensure that the board has the
prerogative to justify the “no ratification and
return to the PDWG”.</span><span lang="ES"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">Why wait for the organization to be put at
risk yet members of the PDWG are already anticipating
risks from the said proposals. I would rather the PDWG
resolved the risks of the proposal taking into
consideration that valid objections and staff impact
analysis issues have been addressed before the WG
managers can send the proposal to the board for
ratification with a full blessing of the entire WG.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">We have to be a responsible PDWG Jordi......<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES">Noah<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><span
lang="ES"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
lang="ES"><br>
**********************************************<br>
IPv4 is over<br>
Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
<a href="http://www.theipv6company.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
The IPv6 Company<br>
<br>
This electronic message contains information which may be
privileged or confidential. The information is intended to
be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above
and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this information,
even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you
are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, even if partially, including attached files, is
strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense,
so you must reply to the original sender to inform about
this communication and delete it.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<title></title>
<p>Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za">mje@posix.co.za</a> Tel: <a href="tel:+27826010496">+27.826010496</a><br>
For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: <a
href="https://ftth.posix.co.za">https://ftth.posix.co.za</a><br>
<br>
<img moz-do-not-send="false"
src="cid:part7.1EFC5C75.72275371@posix.co.za" alt="Posix
Systems" width="250" height="165"><img moz-do-not-send="false"
src="cid:part8.06960698.8C90D84E@posix.co.za" alt="VCARD for
MJ Elkins" title="VCARD, Scan me please!" width="164"
height="164"><br>
</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>