<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 21, 2021, at 3:24 PM, Gregoire EHOUMI <<a href="mailto:gregoire.ehoumi@yahoo.fr" class="">gregoire.ehoumi@yahoo.fr</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><span style="orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; widows: 2;" class="">Hi Owen</span><div class=""><div style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class=""><br class=""></div>
<div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 17, 2021, at 9:30 PM, Owen DeLong <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" class="">owen@delong.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">This is not an accurate reflection of my comments.<br class=""><br class="">I stated emphatically that the recalled co-chairs should be allowed to run.<br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class=""><div class="">The recalled cochairs to be allowed to run as interim cochairs to serve the remainder of the terms? Or thereafter?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Reason and decency will win.</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>They should remain eligible to run in any election for co-chairs for any terms available in said elections.</div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class="">I also stated emphatically that we should follow the PDP and the PDP calls for the working group<br class="">to elect co-chairs..<br class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class=""><div class="">Your insatiable appetite for election and persistence in the wrong interpretation of section 3.3, make any discussion with you pointless...</div><div class="">Can you point to the section of the CPM which calls for the WG to “elect” co-chairs?</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>I stand corrected, 3.3 is not where election is specified… Rather it is contained here:</div><div><br class=""></div><div><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group#election" class="">https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group#election</a></div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class="">Enough has been said, time to move on</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>Apologies for the confusion on where the prohibition of consensus was derived from. It was an honest mistake.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>In fact, the provenance of this document is unclear to me and I am unsure as to whether it is actually authoritative or not as a result.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Can someone from staff please review that document and get back to this group on its provenance and level of authority over the conduct of the group?</div><div><br class=""></div><div>If we are not bound by that document, then I will, indeed, admit that consensus (if it can be achieved) may be a valid way forward.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Now ,Gregoire, can you acknowledge that in a contentious environment where consensus cannot be achieved that an election, preferably one using ranked choice voting, is the best way forward?</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Owen</div><div><br class=""></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">—</div><div class="">Gregoire</div></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class="">Owen<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Feb 16, 2021, at 3:07 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" class="">rpd@afrinic.net</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Dear Board, all,<br class=""><br class="">Following the February 10th email from the Board Chair, the PDWG has discussed the possible options on the way forward after the Recall of the PDWG co-chairs.<br class=""><br class="">The attached document, already circulated today in the RPD, is a summary and conclusions of the discussions reached by the consensus of the PDWG.<br class=""><br class="">The PDWG hasn't requested any change to the document in the last few hours, however it has been updated just to correct a couple of typos (track of changes show them).<br class=""><br class="">As a consequence, the decision is:<br class=""><br class="">"Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census)."<br class=""><br class="">We should remark, as it has been suggested already by some participants in the discussion, that the ideal situation would be, once candidates are introduced to the PDWG, we have a constructive discussion in the list (and hopefully among the candidates) and some of the candidates withdraw, so an actual election process is no longer needed, as it already happened in the previous elections. Of course, this can't be guaranteed, so the elections process must be ready for that contingence.<br class=""><br class="">We will await your decision about the timing and the call for candidates.<br class=""><br class="">Regards,<br class="">Jordi<br class="">@jordipalet<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">**********************************************<br class="">IPv4 is over<br class="">Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br class=""><a href="http://www.theipv6company.com/" class="">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br class="">The IPv6 Company<br class=""><br class="">This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br class=""><br class=""><summary-of-way-forward-new-co-chairs-v2.pdf>_______________________________________________<br class="">RPD mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">RPD mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class=""><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>