<div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">Hello PDWG,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Can we try a different approach?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">1. Agree on appointing one interim chair until the next meeting</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">1.1 If yes (which is my preference), can we look for an experienced participant to volunteer in this role?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">2. Instead, we use the PDP to deliberate on the proposals which are already under discussion?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.afrinic.net/policy/proposals</a></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Cheers,</div><div dir="auto">Noah<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, 12:33 Sunday Folayan, <<a href="mailto:sfolayan@skannet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">sfolayan@skannet.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>In the light of MJE's contribution, I would like to modify my
earlier submission.</p>
<p><br>
My personal preference for Interim Chairs' selection:
<br>
<br>
• [A] a selection through rough consensus [2] After prospects do
volunteer;
<br>
• [B] a selection based on ranking voting [3] if more than 2
volunteers, then discussions;
<br>
• [C] a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1] if
more than 2 candidates and discussions stalemate;
<br>
• [D] a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria
[4] (a long and unnecessary process for selecting the interim
Chairs);
<br>
• [E] any other possibility?
<br>
<br>
</p>
<p>I have no problem with NOMCOM being the selectees in [D] above.
It will not be a long and un-necessary process.<br>
</p>
<p>Sunday.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div>On 2/19/21 9:58 AM, Mark Elkins wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<p>Ask the NomCom to ask for volunteers. Just use the templates
from 2020. Have an initial cut-off after seven days.</p>
<p>With last year, I was quite ecstatic when we ended up with just
one volunteer. "Consensus" as such is great.</p>
<p>However, we technically need one person for three to six months
and another for that same period plus one year. I'm wondering
whether it might be more sane to extend both of these positions
by one year? - or we simply consent to have the same people
extended by an additional year each at whenever we have the next
AFRINIC meeting? Alternativly - we could be seen as simply
bringing forwards the normal election of Co-Chairs to now(ish) -
as we have an urgent need.<br>
</p>
<p>We also need to have a system on deciding who is in for a short
term and who is in for a longer term. Voting may be the simplest
method (as this will all be done remotely).</p>
<p>Any way - my thoughts.<br>
</p>
<div>On 2/19/21 9:55 AM, Sunday Folayan
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">Hello
Sylvain <br>
<br>
On 2/18/21 11:48 PM, Sylvain Baya wrote: <br>
<blockquote type="cite">~°~ <br>
• a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1]; <br>
• a selection through rough consensus [2]; <br>
• a selection based on ranking voting [3]; <br>
• a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria
[4]; <br>
• any other possibility? <br>
~°~ <br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
My personal preference for Interim Chairs' selection: <br>
<br>
• a selection through rough consensus [2] After prospects do
volunteer; <br>
• a selection based on ranking voting [3] if more than 2
volunteers, then discussions; <br>
• a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1] if more
than 2 candidates and discussions stalemate; <br>
• a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4]
(a long and unnecessary process for selecting the interim
Chairs); <br>
• any other possibility? <br>
<br>
<br>
Sunday. <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
RPD mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<div>-- <br>
<p>Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa<br>
<a href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">mje@posix.co.za</a>
Tel: <a href="tel:+27826010496" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">+27.826010496</a><br>
For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: <a href="https://ftth.posix.co.za" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://ftth.posix.co.za</a><br>
<br>
<img src="cid:part6.96B7F79A.5B7E826B@skannet.com" alt="Posix
Systems" width="250" height="165"><img src="cid:part7.3E54C911.CA03703E@skannet.com" alt="VCARD for
MJ Elkins" title="VCARD, Scan me please!" width="164" height="164"><br>
</p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>