<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, 01:56 Sylvain Baya, <<a href="mailto:abscoco@gmail.com">abscoco@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto">Dear PDWG,<br></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Hi Sylvain</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>....a remaining question: <br></div><div>Which model of *selection* y'all prefer?</div><div><br></div><div>
~°~</div><div>• a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1];<br></div><div><div>• a selection through rough consensus [2];<div>• a selection based on ranking voting [3];</div><div><div>• a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4];</div><div><div>• any other possibility?<br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Since the working group functions by participation, a selection by rough consensus would come in handy after all, the PDWG activities end goal is to accomplish work by finding a path to consensus so [2] should be considered as first option by the WG.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">A selection based on ranking voting would be the second best choice imho so [3] should be considered as second choice by the WG imho.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">NOTE: Before we even think of the above, can we as a WG agree on a set of criteria for one to become a chair. This I believe is more important and I have some few ideas like;</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">1. Active participation in WG discussions, in say, the past 3 years.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">2. Demonstrate clear understanding of the CPM and especially sections that relate to PDWG.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">3. Some 5 years sound technical experience in this space with a clear understanding of Internet Protocol and preferably having worked in this space.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">4. Affiliation with an entity which is am AFRINIC resource members could come in handy. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">5. Understanding of rfc7282 and what rough consensus and consensus is all about, after all consensus is a path and not a destination.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Other participants in this WG can also add and we see what criteria are more required and which ones to discard to keep it simple.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I stand to be corrected but I think we as a WG have an obligation to first sort this requirements out before we can think of the selection of interim co-chairs.</div><div dir="auto"> <br></div><div dir="auto">Cheers,</div><div dir="auto">Noah</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><div><div><div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Ok </div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><div><div><div></div></div></div></div></div><div>
~°~</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks once more!</div><div>__</div><div>[1]: <font size="1"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><<a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group?lang=en-GB#election" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group?lang=en-GB#election</a><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-878e1224-7fff-9baf-ae2c-dddbc6455a43">></span></span></font></div><div>[2]: <font size="1"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_consensus" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_consensus</a><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-878e1224-7fff-9baf-ae2c-dddbc6455a43">></span></span></font></div><div>[3]: <font size="1"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting</a><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-878e1224-7fff-9baf-ae2c-dddbc6455a43">></span></span></font></div><div>[4]: <font size="1"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_college" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_college</a><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="m_-3622764627218781282gmail-docs-internal-guid-878e1224-7fff-9baf-ae2c-dddbc6455a43">></span></span></font></div><div><br></div><div>Shalom,</div><div>--sb.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">
</div>
<div dir="auto">Sunday.<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div>On 2/18/21 1:04 PM, Sylvain Baya wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">{start a new thread from [1]}</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Dear PDWG,<br>
<br>
Hope you are safe and well!</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><tl;dr></div>
<div dir="auto">This PDWG has violated its own PDP by reaching a
consensus non PDP-compliant. In fact, the actualités CPM
(version 1.6) contains no provision which could allow the PDWG
to varying the process without at least one PDWG's Chair in
place.</div>
<div dir="auto"><tl;dr></div>
<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>[...]</p></div></blockquote></div></div></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>