<div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><div>Dear PDWG,<br><br>Please see below (inline)...</div><div dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le jeu. 18 févr. 2021 21:17, Sunday Folayan <<a href="mailto:sfolayan@skannet.com" target="_blank">sfolayan@skannet.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div dir="auto">Sylvain,<br>
</div>
<p>You wrote</p>
<div dir="auto"><b>"10| Let's back to the PDP to do the only task
we PDWG are allowed to do without our Chairs. Sunday, please
can you handle the process to help the PDWG to enforce its
PDP?" </b><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">Enforcing the PDP is not the role of anyone
person. We all should be active and vigilant.<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Hi Sunday,</div><div dir="auto">Thanks for you kick response, brother. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">
[...]</div></div></div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I still insist that the provisions of the PDP,
according to the CPM is:</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><font color="#0"><b><span style="font-family:Roboto,sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;display:inline!important;float:none">"If the Working Group Chair is unable to serve
his or her full term, the Working Group may select a
replacement to serve the remainder of the term. If the
Working Group Chairs are unable to attend the Public Policy
Meeting, the Working Group shall nominate a Chair for the
session. Anyone present at the meeting, whether in person or
by remote participation, may participate in the selection
process for a temporary Chair"</span></b></font></div>
<div dir="auto"><span style="color:rgb(117,117,117);font-family:Roboto,sans-serif;font-size:14px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;display:inline!important;float:none"></span></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">...exactly ! </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto"><br></div>
<div dir="auto">See the word selection process there? That is what
we need to define by consensus. </div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Agreed! thanks for pointing it out.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">As a working group, we can select
our Co-Chairs, by simply asking the staff/Policy Liaison to call
for volunteers, and shepherd the process, reverting always to the
WG for guidance, when needed (which ultimately defines the
process)<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I like the proposition by Noah, specifically:</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><b>"Can AFRINIC staff and specifically Madhvi take
up the lead and work with the WG to ensure that its following
the CPM to fill the vacancy.
I dont support the rushed work that was done here by Jordi since
there is already claims of misinteretation.
Please afford this working group time to self organise"</b></div>
<div dir="auto"></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">...i'm ok with the implication of the policy liaison to ease the process. <br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I urge everyone to adopt it, as a way forward with
an Affirmative YES. Personally, I support the above
CPM-compatible line of action.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>YES<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">
</div>
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">Anyone can also propose some other CPM-Compatible
action</div>
<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>....a remaining question: <br></div><div>Which model of *selection* y'all prefer?</div><div><br></div><div>
~°~</div><div>• a selection based on an election (online) as usual [1];<br></div><div><div>• a selection through rough consensus [2];<div>• a selection based on ranking voting [3];</div><div><div>• a selection inside a group of selectees based on criteria [4];</div><div><div>• any other possibility?<br></div></div></div></div></div><div>
~°~</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks once more!</div><div>__</div><div>[1]: <font size="1"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><<a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group?lang=en-GB#election">https://afrinic.net/policy/development-working-group?lang=en-GB#election</a><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-878e1224-7fff-9baf-ae2c-dddbc6455a43">></span></span></font></div><div>[2]: <font size="1"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_consensus">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rough_consensus</a><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-878e1224-7fff-9baf-ae2c-dddbc6455a43">></span></span></font></div><div>[3]: <font size="1"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting</a><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-878e1224-7fff-9baf-ae2c-dddbc6455a43">></span></span></font></div><div>[4]: <font size="1"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><</span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_college">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_college</a><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-f5685063-7fff-50b0-9772-f05b6a8e7335"><span style="font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0);background-color:transparent;font-weight:400;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;text-decoration:none;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap" id="gmail-docs-internal-guid-878e1224-7fff-9baf-ae2c-dddbc6455a43">></span></span></font></div><div><br></div><div>Shalom,</div><div>--sb.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">
</div>
<div dir="auto">Sunday.<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div>On 2/18/21 1:04 PM, Sylvain Baya wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">{start a new thread from [1]}</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Dear PDWG,<br>
<br>
Hope you are safe and well!</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><tl;dr></div>
<div dir="auto">This PDWG has violated its own PDP by reaching a
consensus non PDP-compliant. In fact, the actualités CPM
(version 1.6) contains no provision which could allow the PDWG
to varying the process without at least one PDWG's Chair in
place.</div>
<div dir="auto"><tl;dr></div>
<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>[...]</p></div></blockquote></div></div></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>
</div>