<div dir="auto">Oui je vous comprend, si je ne pas l'expérience mais il ya ceux qui en ont.<div dir="auto">Voilà pourquoi nous allons continuer à bloquer la machine par le fait que nos propositions veulent se pencher d'un côté ou d'une autre sans tenir compte de la communauté.</div><div dir="auto">Non aux élections mais oui aux personnes expérimenté ! Comment ils sont devenus expert? Né avec? Je ne pense pas. Ce pourquoi nous avons proposé que de constituer la liste des candidats potentiels en deux catégories : liste des anciens coprésidents avec critères leur passé au poste et des nouvelles personnes avec comme critère leur CV pour constituer un équilibre dans la communauté. Ici on a besoin de la continuité pas de tiré le drap a son côté.</div><div dir="auto">Puis le conseil d'administration va présenter une liste de candidats présélectionnés a la communauté après l'analyse et traitement des dossiers des candidats potentiels pour une approbation ou des avis de la communauté sur le personnage. Puis la nomination va suivre pour une durée avant pendant et installation de nouveau coprésidents élu. Alors pourquoi refusé ma proposition et comment pensez vous résoudre le problème de vide aujourd'hui ? </div><div dir="auto">Très chers membres de la communauté, je dit.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">Le jeu. 11 févr. 2021 à 16:31, <<a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Send RPD mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rpd@afrinic.net</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:rpd-owner@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rpd-owner@afrinic.net</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: WE NEED YOUR INPUT, MAXIMUM BY TUESDAY 16TH NOON:<br>
Decision of way forward for new (transition or elected) co-chairs<br>
(Arnaud AMELINA)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:30:23 +0000<br>
From: Arnaud AMELINA <<a href="mailto:amelnaud@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">amelnaud@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: Owen DeLong <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">owen@delong.com</a>><br>
Cc: "rpd >> AfriNIC Resource Policy" <<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rpd@afrinic.net</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [rpd] WE NEED YOUR INPUT, MAXIMUM BY TUESDAY 16TH NOON:<br>
Decision of way forward for new (transition or elected) co-chairs<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAGDMR_f1cM99vnGuVz73RhEjrx-o9=0ZZa-Q7=<a href="mailto:t%2Bniaq-hpLoA@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">t+niaq-hpLoA@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Je pense que c'est l'id?e du vote m?me que nous rejetons surtout s'il faut<br>
utiliser Cette Liste de discussion compl?tement compromise par des<br>
identit?s fictives. Je soutiens ce que Marcus a dit. Donc vraiment il faut<br>
que la communaut? liste les pr?-requis pour occuper de telles positions,<br>
car place des gens qui n'ont pas l'exp?rience donne les r?sultats qu'on a<br>
observ? avec les co-pr?sidents d?chus de leur fonctions. S'ils ?taient bon<br>
et qu'ils avaient suivi les principes de fonctionnement de cette communaut?<br>
ils n'auraient pas ?t? d?chus, car certains membres du Groupe qui a<br>
travaill? dans le RC, ce n'est pas toi qui me dira le contraire sont des<br>
personnes assez exp?riment?es, reconnues comme comp?tentes sur tous<br>
plusieurs plans et qui ont servi cette communaut?.<br>
<br>
Donc Cette communaut? qui a r?clam?e leur d?ch?ance n'est pas dupe donc<br>
arr?tes de nous distraire Owen, en d?fendant l'ind?fendable et permet ?<br>
cette communaut? d'avancer sur la meilleur solution qui nous ?vitera de<br>
commettre les m?mes erreurs qu'avant.<br>
<br>
Cordialement.<br>
<br>
Le jeu. 11 f?vr. 2021 ? 14:02, Owen DeLong <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">owen@delong.com</a>> a ?crit :<br>
<br>
> I am absolutely serious.<br>
><br>
> All the work the recall committee has done has been to remove them from<br>
> office. That?s been accomplished.<br>
><br>
> However, neither that recall committee, nor those who called for the<br>
> recall, even if combined constitute a majority of the community.<br>
><br>
> The community should have the right to decide the co-chairs. I think it<br>
> unlikely they would run in the first place, but even if they do,<br>
> I think it extremely unlikely they would get a significant fraction of the<br>
> vote under the circumstances.<br>
><br>
> However, that is neither my, nor your decision to make on behalf of the<br>
> community. Let the voters vote. Do you really think that<br>
> it is so dangerous if the voters have this choice available to them that<br>
> you are unwilling to trust the electorate?<br>
><br>
> Owen<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Feb 11, 2021, at 05:08 , Arnaud AMELINA <<a href="mailto:amelnaud@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">amelnaud@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Le jeu. 11 f?vr. 2021 ? 12:20, Owen DeLong <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">owen@delong.com</a>> a ?crit :<br>
><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Feb 11, 2021, at 02:16 , Mark Elkins <<a href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">mje@posix.co.za</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I'll go with what Mike has said, that is - Option 1. I think a directive<br>
>> from the CEO & Chair is all that is needed and doesn't really need to wait<br>
>> a week for a full Board Meeting. It is on the shoulders of this community<br>
>> to fix the problem.<br>
>><br>
>> I think we should only allow the same people that were eligible to vote<br>
>> last time - which would save time. I presume that list still exists.<br>
>><br>
>> I'd like to see at least four people standing. I don't believe that the<br>
>> two ex-chairs should be allowed to stand (we are trying to change a bad<br>
>> situation). Personally, I'd like to see people standing that are resource<br>
>> owners - as they then have their own skin in the game - as such. No one<br>
>> with a policy in the current process chain should stand.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I don?t think that they should be precluded from standing. While the<br>
>> recall was successful and I think that they are unlikely to receive a<br>
>> plurality of votes as a result, if the community votes to put them back<br>
>> into office, I see no reason that the community should be deprived of that<br>
>> option.<br>
>><br>
> t'es pas s?rieux l?, Owen, tu veux dire que tout le travail que le RC a<br>
> fait serait inutile et que les m?me qu'ils viennent de d?m?tre peuvent ?tre<br>
> encore autoris?s ? comp?tir ?<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> Most votes - person stands for remainder of two years,<br>
>> second most votes - stands for remainder of this current year.<br>
>><br>
>> As Arnaud AMELINA <<a href="mailto:amelnaud@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">amelnaud@gmail.com</a>> <<a href="mailto:amelnaud@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">amelnaud@gmail.com</a>> said on 24th<br>
>> Dec:<br>
>> > Is it normal that out of 2 cochairs, none is contact of a resource<br>
>> member?<br>
>> > Having a cochair who runs network and serves as contact (technical) of<br>
>> a resource member is a big wish as previously discussed in this community.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I don?t think it would be unreasonable to add this as an eligibility<br>
>> requirement through modification of the relevant PDP sections, but I don?t<br>
>> think we should be making it up on the fly without community discussion.<br>
>> There is a process for amending the eligibility requirements and we should<br>
>> follow it if we wish to do so.<br>
>><br>
>> Owen<br>
>><br>
>> !<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 2/11/21 11:45 AM, Mike Silber wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Jaco +1<br>
>><br>
>> Really humbling that a WG member from outside our region is the one<br>
>> trying to drive to consensus.<br>
>><br>
>> Some comments inline.<br>
>><br>
>> Mike<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 11 Feb 2021, at 11:28, Jaco Kroon <<a href="mailto:jaco@uls.co.za" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">jaco@uls.co.za</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Jordi,<br>
>><br>
>> Thank you for your drive on this.<br>
>><br>
>> On 2021/02/11 10:45, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi all,<br>
>><br>
>> Following the previous email, we have 4 choices for selecting the new<br>
>> co-chairs:<br>
>><br>
>> 1. Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize<br>
>> on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census).<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Agree with 1.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Pros for (1) / Cons against (2):<br>
>> - quicker turn around for (1)<br>
>> - we don't know when feasible we would be able to arrange for (2)<br>
>><br>
>> Cons against (1) / Pros for (2)<br>
>> - Easier to generate bogus votes for (1).<br>
>><br>
>> Agreed<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> 3. Ask the board to choose 2 transition co-chairs, so we can have<br>
>> elections in the future (option 2 above).<br>
>> 4. Nominate ourselves a few names for transition co-chairs and let the<br>
>> board to decide among them, once they confirm their willingness to take the<br>
>> job, so we can have elections in the future (option 2 above).<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Personally I don't really think that (3) and (4) are two distinct<br>
>> options, more like we should try to get recommendations / nominees to<br>
>> the board as per 4, and then give the board prerogative to select the<br>
>> candidates (even from non-nominees if none of the nominees have the<br>
>> required background / skills / suitability, obviously with motivations).<br>
>><br>
>> Agreed. I like the option of 4 + 3 if we can get some rough consensus on<br>
>> this list of some nominees. Particularly if (1) takes some time.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> RPD mailing listRPD@afrinic.nethttps://<a href="http://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>> Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa<br>
>> <a href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">mje@posix.co.za</a> Tel: +27.826010496 <+27826010496><br>
>> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: <a href="https://ftth.posix.co.za" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://ftth.posix.co.za</a><br>
>><br>
>> <abessive_logo.jpg><QR-MJElkins.png><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> RPD mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> RPD mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210211/7b7cb592/attachment.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210211/7b7cb592/attachment.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of RPD Digest, Vol 173, Issue 46<br>
************************************<br>
</blockquote></div>