<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><div dir="auto" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div></div>
</div>
<div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 9 Feb 2021, at 12:12, Ibeanusi Elvis <<a href="mailto:ibeanusielvis@gmail.com" class="">ibeanusielvis@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Dear community, <br class=""><br class="">Of course we are in a strange and terrible situation, for quite sometime now a good number of us have been calling for a Recall of the Co-chairs and unsurprisingly we’ve got our requests and now people are surprised by it. <br class="">First things first, I would suggest that we wait for the Board formalities and declarations because I concur that it would assist us as the WG in taking next steps. There is no need for being in such haste right now.<br class=""></div></div></blockquote>Nobody is surprised by it. A good call was made.<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class="">Although according to the CPM Section 3.3 states that “the WG may select a replacement to serve the reminder of the term” but to the best of my knowledge, I would propose that the co-chairs should retain and maintain their positions until the next meeting elections because they were well-experienced at their works and also the co-chairs were performing greatly at their duties despite the polarized nature of the WG, they still found a balance to work and conduct their duties. <br class=""></div></div></blockquote>Say what? Did you toke time to read the documents and outcomes on the recall itself?</div><div><br class=""></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class="">Best, <br class="">Elvis. <br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>Cheers,</div><div>Darwin-.</div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Feb 9, 2021, at 19:31, Daniel Yakmut <<a href="mailto:yakmutd@googlemail.com" class="">yakmutd@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Of course the CPM will continuously require update and changes.<br class=""><br class="">Cheers,<br class=""><br class="">Daniel<br class=""><br class="">On 09/02/2021 10:51 am, Nishal Goburdhan wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 9 Feb 2021, at 11:18, Daniel Yakmut via RPD wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">If truly the Recall committee is this powerful then the process will have<br class=""></blockquote>ahem.<br class=""><br class="">you mean, the CPM will have to be changed.<br class="">which, is quite possible; there’s a process for that ..<br class=""><br class="">—n.<br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">RPD mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">RPD mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">RPD mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" class="">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br class="">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>