<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \(Cuerpo en alfa";
panose-1:2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML con formato previo Car";
margin:0cm;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLconformatoprevioCar
{mso-style-name:"HTML con formato previo Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML con formato previo";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.EstiloCorreo21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=ES link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Hi Madhvi, all,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>My understanding is that the ARIN comment on this proposal (AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT04 – To be clear, I’m only talking about this one from now on), is only a comment. I don’t really understand it, and I’ve the feeling that they missed reading the section title:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;color:#C45911'>5.7.2 Conditions </span><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;color:#C45911'>on the source</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;color:#C45911'> of the transfer</span><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:#C45911'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>This clearly states that that section is for the source of the transfer, and ARIN is saying “5.7.2.2 language does not always explicitly state that the source entity requirements apply solely to source entities”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>So, in my opinion their comment is incorrect. Can you clarify with them?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>If it is me missing something, can you ask them to explain with other wording. Non-native English speakers as myself, can be missing something maybe?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I also understand that they said “this proposal is compatible with or without that clarification”, however, I prefer to clarify it if really needed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>In my next version I will remove the ASN, and I will send a separate proposal for ASN, so to avoid mixing things. I think it may be easeir to reach consensus “spliting” the problem in two proposals. Anyway, the input from APNIC, which was anyway a clarification – I asked already about this, but never got the response – will be good to make sure to have a good new AS transfers proposal.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Regarding LACNIC input, we know that they don’t have ASN transfers at the moment, but it is clear that it doesn’t make the proposal incompatible. Regarding the other comment, I understand that it is just a comment, not stating any incompatibility. Can you please confirm?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Tks!<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black'>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Jordi<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>@jordipalet<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'>El 27/10/20 6:22, "Madhvi Gokool" <<a href="mailto:madhvi@afrinic.net">madhvi@afrinic.net</a>> escribió:<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>Dear PDWG</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Please find the other RIRs' response regarding the compatibility/reciprocity of the following proposals in the document attached. <o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d2#proposal"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1155CC;text-decoration:none'>Resource Transfer Policy(draft 2)</span></a> - <span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black;background:white'>AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT02</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-v4-003-d2#proposal"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1155CC;text-decoration:none'>Resource Transfer Policy(draft 3)</span></a> - <span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black;background:white'>AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT03</span><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-gen-002-d2"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1155CC;text-decoration:none'>AFRINIC Number Resources Transfer Policy - </span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;background:white;text-decoration:none'>AFPUB-2019-GEN-002-DRAFT02</span></a><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'><a href="https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2019-ipv4-002-d4"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#1155CC;text-decoration:none'>IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers (Comprehensive Scope) - </span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:black;text-decoration:none'>AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT04</span></a><o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'>If you are commenting on a specific proposal , please ensure that you mention the policy name or ID in the subject line .<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Kind Regards<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Madhvi<o:p></o:p></p><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'>-- <o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Madhvi Gokool<o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Senior IP Resources Specialist<o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'>AFRINIC Ltd.<o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'>t: +230 403 5100 | f: +230 466 6758 | <o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'>w: <a href="http://www.afrinic.net">www.afrinic.net</a><o:p></o:p></pre><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'>On 23/09/2020 9:51 AM, Madhvi Gokool wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'> Dear PDWG<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'>During the Policy discussions in the AFRINIC-32 PPM on 17 Sep 2020, there was a debate regarding the reciprocity of one inter-RIR transfer policy proposal with ARIN. The Policy Liaison had responded that since there are 3 policy proposals under discussion and that two of them had undergone revision in 2020 , AFRINIC shall contact ARIN to get their authoritative response in regard to the reciprocity of all the <b>3 proposals</b>.<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Since the LACNIC, RIPE and APNIC RIRs all have inter-RIR transfer policies, and we, AFRINIC do not have their assessment of the reciprocity of the 3 policy proposals under discussion on record, AFRINIC has therefore reached out to all 4 RIRs to get their inputs regarding the reciprocity of the<b> three </b>policy proposals that were discussed in the AFRINIC PPM last week.<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'>We shall update you once we have received the updates from the 4 RIRs. "<o:p></o:p></p><p style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Kind Regards<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Madhvi <br><br><o:p></o:p></p><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'>RPD mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre style='margin-left:35.4pt'><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'>_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <o:p></o:p></p></div><br>**********************************************<br>
IPv4 is over<br>
Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
http://www.theipv6company.com<br>
The IPv6 Company<br>
<br>
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br>
<br>
</body></html>