<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Dear Jordi,</p>
    <p>Are we out rightly saying people with minimum experience on some
      topics must keep quiet when issues on the topic(s) is being
      discussed. Is this not an attempt at gagging and totally shutting
      out potential learners and members of the community?</p>
    <p>I would rather have thought we will encourage even the
      inexperience ones to talk to a topic, where they make mistakes we
      can gently correct and guide so that they can be experience. I
      think this will be referred  to as mentoring. Possibly this is not
      a culture of this community, that is nurturing novice to be
      experts.</p>
    <p>On the flip side if the inexperience ones are to keep quiet and
      possibly stay away, then we will  be creating a 'cult' community
      and I believe that is not what PWDG is all about. In essence
      tolerance is important here.</p>
    <p>Simply</p>
    <p>Daniel<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/10/2020 10:27 am, JORDI PALET
      MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:E9A0F4F2-1D66-4521-895F-090F7D84C303@consulintel.es">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Times New Roman \(Cuerpo en alfa";
        panose-1:2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EstiloCorreo18
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="ES-TRAD">Hi Mike,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="ES-TRAD"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US">This reminded to me something …<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US">Looking at the message <a
              href="https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/011592.html"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2020/011592.html</a>,
            and the attached document, presumable authored by Lamiaa and
            Wijdane, the metadata shows that it was actually written by
            Lucilla.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US">Not saying anything specific to this (I will
            comment on this proposal at due time) just “food for
            thought”.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US">So yes, I've been always against that, but I’m
            starting to believe that we may need to rethink if something
            like the “ICANN” WG statement of interest is needed in our
            PDP or at least an alternative way to avoid people
            presumably using different emails or debating/contributing
            with at least a minimum experience in some topics.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black" lang="EN-US">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
              lang="EN-US">Jordi<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
              lang="EN-US">@jordipalet<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
              lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
            lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">El 19/10/20
              8:23, "Mike Silber" <<a
                href="mailto:silber.mike@gmail.com"
                moz-do-not-send="true">silber.mike@gmail.com</a>>
              escribió:<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Lucilla or
            whatever your actual name is.<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Thank you for
            confirming for the mailing list that you and Ekatarina form
            part of the same echo chamber.<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Now you have
            been exposed, you attempt to create distance from that
            person/identity, but it is not working.<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">As I wrote
            before, your opinion on the appeal is frankly irrelevant.
            The appeal process is to an appeal committee. There is no
            mechanism in the PDP to oppose an appeal.<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">The appeal
            process is (supposed to be) objective and (hopefully) not
            capable of manipulation.<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">This mailing
            list has been populated by sock puppets and fictional
            identities for years. People from various view points and
            perspectives have been using these identities to amplify
            their views. So this behavior is not new!<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">I am not sure
            if it has come time to require moderation of all posts and
            positive confirmation of identity before that moderation is
            lifted?<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Mike<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">On Mon, 19
                Oct 2020 at 07:49, lucilla fornaro <<a
                  href="mailto:lucillafornarosawamoto@gmail.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">lucillafornarosawamoto@gmail.com</a>>
                wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
            <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
              1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
              6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">I read
                    your email!<o:p></o:p></p>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">You
                      answered back to Ekaterina, asking HER an
                      explanation for what SHE wrote! Why should I talk
                      on her behalf? How do I know what she meant by
                      using those words?<o:p></o:p></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Is
                      this a constructive discussion? I don't think so.<o:p></o:p></p>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Lucilla <o:p></o:p></p>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Il
                    giorno lun 19 ott 2020 alle ore 14:35 Frank Habicht
                    <<a href="mailto:geier@geier.ne.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">geier@geier.ne.tz</a>>
                    ha scritto:<o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
                <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
                  1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
                  6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">Hi,<br>
                    <br>
                    it seems you didn't read my email. the one you
                    replied to.<br>
                    any comments about what I wrote?<br>
                    <br>
                    Thanks,<br>
                    Frank<br>
                    <br>
                    On 19/10/2020 08:29, lucilla fornaro wrote:<br>
                    > Dear Frank,<br>
                    > <br>
                    > you were the last one who posted and by "reply
                    to all" you were inserted<br>
                    > as well. It was not intentional, but I
                    don't think it creates<br>
                    > any confusion either. The main topic here is
                    the Appeal, and what I<br>
                    > wrote is related to that! <br>
                    > <br>
                    > Lucilla <br>
                    > <br>
                    > <br>
                    > Il giorno lun 19 ott 2020 alle ore 14:15 Frank
                    Habicht<br>
                    > <<a href="mailto:geier@geier.ne.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">geier@geier.ne.tz</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:geier@geier.ne.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">geier@geier.ne.tz</a>>>
                    ha scritto:<br>
                    > <br>
                    >     Hi all,<br>
                    > <br>
                    >     For the record: below email from Lucilla is
                    a *reply* to my email but<br>
                    >     not a response to any content of my email.<br>
                    > <br>
                    >     Others might get confused.<br>
                    >     I'm sure that was not intended. But for the
                    future it would help to<br>
                    >     reply to the emails that one is referring
                    to (or start a new thread).<br>
                    >     Like maybe the appeal email in this
                    case....<br>
                    > <br>
                    >     Thanks,<br>
                    >     Frank<br>
                    > <br>
                    >     On 19/10/2020 05:15, lucilla fornaro wrote:<br>
                    >     > Dear Community,<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > I am against this appeal for the
                    following reasons:<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *1.1* Co-chairs followed the procedure
                    fulfilling their administrative<br>
                    >     > function within the scope of the CPM.
                    The co-chairs carried out their<br>
                    >     > administrative functions that include
                    advancing suggestions.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > Consequently, the authors have the
                    choice to adopt the suggestions and<br>
                    >     > make a change.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > The PDP allows and does not forbid the
                    co-chairs from making<br>
                    >     suggestions<br>
                    >     > concerning major objections
                    facilitating the overall discussion<br>
                    >     related<br>
                    >     > to the policy that can potentially
                    reach consensus.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *1.2 *“Rough consensus is achieved
                    when all issues are addressed, but<br>
                    >     > not necessarily accommodated”. That is
                    exactly what happened: the<br>
                    >     policy<br>
                    >     > reached a rough consensus during the
                    PPM (openly determined<br>
                    >     > by Co-chairs) and went to the last
                    call for some editorial changes.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *1.3* PDP needs to be considered as a
                    guideline of practices and not<br>
                    >     > strict rules. It adopts COMMONLY
                    accepted practices and provides the<br>
                    >     > FLEXIBILITY to adapt to a variety of
                    circumstances that can occur<br>
                    >     during<br>
                    >     > the discussion of policies.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > Co-chairs did not make the rough
                    consensus of the policy conditional,<br>
                    >     > they have just advanced some
                    suggestions, that as we said fulfilling<br>
                    >     > their administrative function within
                    the scope of Afrinic.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *1.4* The PDP is managed and
                    administered by the CPM that does not<br>
                    >     > forbid making changes.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > If we want to follow an objective
                    reading and interpretation of<br>
                    >     PDP, we<br>
                    >     > will see that nowhere in the text it
                    is stated that the policy is not<br>
                    >     > allowed to underdo editorial changes
                    after the meeting. This means<br>
                    >     that<br>
                    >     > no violation occurred.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *1.5* No major changes have been
                    addressed in the last 2 drafts,<br>
                    >     in fact<br>
                    >     > there was no need for Impact Analysis
                    from Afrinic. It is clear<br>
                    >     that the<br>
                    >     > community members have had exhaustive
                    time to discuss the policy and<br>
                    >     > therefore there is no violation of
                    CPM.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *1.6* Co-Chairs job is to address
                    major objections and suggest changes<br>
                    >     > (it is part of their administrative
                    work). The co-chairs have<br>
                    >     never been<br>
                    >     > intrusive or coercive in their
                    suggestions. They have never tried to<br>
                    >     > persuade the authors to make changes
                    by using threats.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *2.1* The Working Group Chairs MAY
                    request AFRINIC to provide an<br>
                    >     > analysis of the changes made and of
                    how these changes impact the<br>
                    >     policy<br>
                    >     > proposal. This proves that no major
                    changes have been made for DRAFT03<br>
                    >     > and DRAFT04, therefore there is no
                    need for an Impact Assessment from<br>
                    >     > AFRINIC .<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *2.2 *By removing the previous
                    paragraph, the authors did not<br>
                    >     alter the<br>
                    >     > overall purpose of the proposal.  For
                    what concerns 5.7.3.1, 5.7.3.2,<br>
                    >     > 5.7.4.1, changes concern the styles
                    used in the document and general<br>
                    >     > appearance and this is to be
                    considered under the “editorial change”.<br>
                    >     > Simple clarifications that do not
                    alter the substantive meaning of the<br>
                    >     > proposal material.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > *2.3* The proposal has been
                    exhaustively discussed in the RPD<br>
                    >     mailing list.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > RIPE indicates AFRINIC the references
                    and recommendations that it<br>
                    >     needs<br>
                    >     > to manage legacy space.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > The current transfer policy's purpose
                    does not mainly focus on solving<br>
                    >     > this problem.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > This proposal was done with the
                    intention of gaining reciprocity with<br>
                    >     > the principal contributor of IPv4s
                    which is ARIN.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > ARIN has responded that the Resource
                    Transfer Policy is not compatible<br>
                    >     > with their inter-RIR transfer policies
                    because of the following<br>
                    >     > statement therein - “The source must
                    be the current rights holder<br>
                    >     of the<br>
                    >     > IPv4 address resources registered with
                    any RIR and shall be in<br>
                    >     > compliance with the policies of the
                    receiving RIR.”<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > regards,<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > Lucilla <br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     > Il giorno lun 19 ott 2020 alle ore
                    01:02 Frank Habicht<br>
                    >     > <<a href="mailto:geier@geier.ne.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">geier@geier.ne.tz</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:geier@geier.ne.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">geier@geier.ne.tz</a>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a
                      href="mailto:geier@geier.ne.tz" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">geier@geier.ne.tz</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:geier@geier.ne.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">geier@geier.ne.tz</a>>>>
                    ha scritto:<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     Hi Ekaterina,<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     see inline below.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     16/10/2020 20:33, Ekaterina
                    Kalugina wrote:<br>
                    >     >     > Dear community,<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > I believe this appeal is
                    problematic for the following reasons.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >  1.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >     The compliance to the PDP
                    and consensus determination<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > 1.3 The policy discussion we
                    had was complex and nuanced and<br>
                    >     therefore<br>
                    >     >     > it was the co-chairs duty to
                    reflect this nuance in their<br>
                    >     conclusions.<br>
                    >     >     > There was no conditions
                    imposed.<br>
                    >     >                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
                    >     >     > The co-chairs simply stated
                    that if<br>
                    >     >                                      
                    ^^^^<br>
                    >     >     > some minor objections were to
                    be addressed by the authors<br>
                    >     then the<br>
                    >     >     > policy have achieved rough
                    consensus.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     I think the part after the 'if' is
                    a condition.<br>
                    >     >     I think you're contradicting
                    yourself.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     Maybe I have a problem with my
                    English knowledge. If so,<br>
                    >     please help me<br>
                    >     >     understand.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     Of course after that (what I call
                    a contradiction), I could<br>
                    >     not continue<br>
                    >     >     reading the email, because I can't
                    be sure whether you base you<br>
                    >     >     arguments on "no conditions" or on
                    "If ...".<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     I really hope co-chairs and all in
                    this WG don't give too much<br>
                    >     weight to<br>
                    >     >     arguments based on
                    self-contradicting statements. The facts<br>
                    >     are there.<br>
                    >     >     And of course I hope that was
                    "professional and respectful"<br>
                    >     enough for<br>
                    >     >     Lamiaa.<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     Regards,<br>
                    >     >     Frank<br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >     > Nowhere in the PDP it states
                    how<br>
                    >     >     > exactly the chairs should
                    determine consensus, therefore I<br>
                    >     believe<br>
                    >     >     that<br>
                    >     >     > in this case the chairs acted
                    within their prerogative.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > 1.4 The CPM does not
                    explicitly state that only editorial<br>
                    >     changes are<br>
                    >     >     > allowed. However, as you
                    pointed out, it is understandable<br>
                    >     that such<br>
                    >     >     > changes may be necessary. The
                    fact that editorial changes<br>
                    >     are the only<br>
                    >     >     > changes that have been made
                    up to this point does not mean<br>
                    >     that these<br>
                    >     >     > are the only changes allowed.
                    The PDP is determined by the<br>
                    >     CPM and not<br>
                    >     >     > by the past practices, and
                    the CPM does not forbid any<br>
                    >     changes during<br>
                    >     >     > the last call, be it
                    editorial or not.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > 1.5 The other proposals did
                    not achieve consensus during the<br>
                    >     >     meeting as<br>
                    >     >     > there were still many
                    unresolved major objections. The Resource<br>
                    >     >     Transfer<br>
                    >     >     > Policy only had minor issues
                    that could be easily addressed<br>
                    >     by the<br>
                    >     >     > authors. Therefore, there is
                    no unfairness in regard to this<br>
                    >     issue.<br>
                    >     >     > And again, nowhere in the CPM
                    it states that non-editorial<br>
                    >     changes are<br>
                    >     >     > not allowed to take place
                    during the last call.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > 1.6 These were not
                    suggestions, but conclusions drawn by the<br>
                    >     >     chairs from<br>
                    >     >     > the discussion. They did
                    summarize the discussion in an<br>
                    >     objective and<br>
                    >     >     > non-intrusive manner. But you
                    need to keep in mind that a<br>
                    >     nuanced<br>
                    >     >     > discussion requires a nuanced
                    summary.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > 1.7. Fairness is the basic
                    principle that guides the PDP and<br>
                    >     that<br>
                    >     >     > includes actions of the
                    co-chairs.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >  2.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >     Specific issues regarding
                    the proposal being appealed<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > 2.1 As the current situation
                    holds – the staff assessment is not<br>
                    >     >     > mandatory and therefore this
                    is not a legitimate ground for the<br>
                    >     >     appeal.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > 2.2 Again, nowhere in the CPM
                    it states that significant changes<br>
                    >     >     cannot<br>
                    >     >     > be done during the last call.
                    In this case particularly, all the<br>
                    >     >     changes<br>
                    >     >     > in the DRAFT-04 have been
                    made to ensure that the Resource<br>
                    >     Transfer<br>
                    >     >     > Policy  is fully compatible
                    with ARIN. There is no need for<br>
                    >     another<br>
                    >     >     > discussion, as this change
                    directly addresses all the issues<br>
                    >     raised in<br>
                    >     >     > all the discussions that
                    preceded the publication of this draft.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > 2.3 The issue of legacy
                    resources is far too complex to be<br>
                    >     >     realistically<br>
                    >     >     > considered within the scope
                    of the proposed policy. The goal<br>
                    >     of this<br>
                    >     >     > policy is to make sure
                    AFRINIC can receive resources from other<br>
                    >     >     RIRs and<br>
                    >     >     > the loss of legacy status is
                    necessary to ensure<br>
                    >     reciprocity. However,<br>
                    >     >     > if there is some perceived
                    unfairness when it comes to the<br>
                    >     transfer of<br>
                    >     >     > legacy resources, a separate
                    policy ought to be introduced<br>
                    >     >     following the<br>
                    >     >     > Resource Transfer policy.
                    There will be the right time and place<br>
                    >     >     to have<br>
                    >     >     > a discussion on legacy with
                    all its nuances. As of now, the main<br>
                    >     >     > priority for the region is to
                    have a resource transfer<br>
                    >     policy that is<br>
                    >     >     > reciprocal with other RIRs.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > As for your note that this
                    proposal is not actually<br>
                    >     reciprocal with<br>
                    >     >     > other RIRs – it is factually
                    incorrect. The staff confirmed<br>
                    >     that the<br>
                    >     >     > DRAFT-02 and DRAFT-03 are not
                    compatible with ARIN, and this is<br>
                    >     >     > precisely the reason DRAFT-04
                    was introduced. And before you say<br>
                    >     >     that it<br>
                    >     >     > was too hasty and it needed
                    more discussion – it really doesn’t.<br>
                    >     >     > DRAFT-04 just removed the
                    section on the sending RIR being bound<br>
                    >     >     by the<br>
                    >     >     > policies of the receiving RIR
                    that made the policy<br>
                    >     incompatible with<br>
                    >     >     > ARIN as per staff assessment.
                    Thus, with all the edits<br>
                    >     considered the<br>
                    >     >     > DRAFT-04 of the Resource
                    Transfer Policy should be<br>
                    >     functional and<br>
                    >     >     fully<br>
                    >     >     > compatible with other RIRs.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > Considering the above, I
                    believe this appeal lacks the necessary<br>
                    >     >     grounds<br>
                    >     >     > to call for the
                    non-declaration of concensus. <br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > Best, <br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > Ekaterina Kalugina <br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020, 19:17
                    Noah <<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a>><br>
                    >     >     <mailto:<a
                      href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a>>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">noah@neo.co.tz</a>>>>><br>
                    >     >     > wrote:<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >     On Thu, 15 Oct 2020,
                    15:59 Gregoire EHOUMI via RPD,<br>
                    >     >     <<a
                      href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>>><br>
                    >     >     >     <mailto:<a
                      href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>>>>>
                    wrote:<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >         Hello,<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >         As per appeal
                    process, see below a copy of my email<br>
                    >     to appeal<br>
                    >     >     >         committee. <br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >     Hi Greg<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >     Pleased to fully support
                    this appeal against the cochairs<br>
                    >     >     >     declaration of rough
                    consensus and consensus on a<br>
                    >     proposal that is<br>
                    >     >     >     had several unresolved
                    valid objections. <br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >     The cochairs erred bigly
                    and its absurd to see the PDP<br>
                    >     process<br>
                    >     >     >     ignored at every step by
                    those who must ensure that they<br>
                    >     follow it<br>
                    >     >     >     while acting fairly
                    without being subjective like we<br>
                    >     have seen<br>
                    >     >     recently.<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >     Cheers<br>
                    >     >     >     Noah<br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >   
                     _______________________________________________<br>
                    >     >     >     RPD mailing list<br>
                    >     >     >     <a
                      href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>>><br>
                    >     >     <mailto:<a
                      href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>>>><br>
                    >     >     >     <a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                    >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>><br>
                    >     >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                    >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>>><br>
                    >     >     >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                    >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>><br>
                    >     >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                    >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>>>><br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     >     >
                    _______________________________________________<br>
                    >     >     > RPD mailing list<br>
                    >     >     > <a
                      href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>>><br>
                    >     >     > <a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                    >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>><br>
                    >     >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                    >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>>><br>
                    >     >     ><br>
                    >     ><br>
                    >     >   
                     _______________________________________________<br>
                    >     >     RPD mailing list<br>
                    >     >     <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
                    >     <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
                    <mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a>>><br>
                    >     >     <a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                    >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>><br>
                    >     >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
                    >     <<a
                      href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>>><br>
                    >     ><br>
                    > <o:p></o:p></p>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">_______________________________________________<br>
                RPD mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
                <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><o:p></o:p></p>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:35.4pt">_______________________________________________
          RPD mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
          <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a> <o:p></o:p></p>
      </div>
      <br>
      **********************************************<br>
      IPv4 is over<br>
      Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.theipv6company.com">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
      The IPv6 Company<br>
      <br>
      This electronic message contains information which may be
      privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for
      the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further
      non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use
      of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
      attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a
      criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
      that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents
      of this information, even if partially, including attached files,
      is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so
      you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
      communication and delete it.<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>