<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Gaby please read the PDP correctly and do not confuse people.<br>
    </p>
    <p>The section 3.5.1 of the CPM says "disagrees with the actions
      taken by the Chair(s)" not just with declarations made during the
      PPM. The Chairs could have changed their decision meanwhile but
      unfortunately they haven't done. They have just decided to keep it
      and it is "a decision" which by the CPM bound to appeal.<br>
    </p>
    <p>Fernando<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/10/2020 10:49, Gaby Giner wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CANuMXapMS6E+FyyD0aNvN0=HgxZABgFU51axbQqtz6zsY9QbEQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="auto">Dear community,
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">
          <div dir="auto">I agree with Lucilla but only wish to add 1
            point.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">I think everyone has overlooked one huge
            matter.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">It is true that by section 3.5(1) of the CPM
            “A person who disagrees with the actions taken by the
            Chair(s) shall discuss the matter with the PDWG Chair(s) or
            with the PDWG”. </div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">However, I wish to remind everyone that by
            section 3.5(2) of the CPM, “The appeal must be submitted
            within two weeks of the public knowledge of the decision”. </div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Applying this into the current facts, the
            Chair has publicly announced its decision on 17th September
            2020 through the online PPM, whereas, the
            disagreement/appeal is only made on 2nd October 2020 onward,
            which is factually beyond the 14 days period to appeal. </div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Therefore, the disagreements/appeal made in
            this email thread/mailing list must be deemed invalid and be
            disregarded.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Thanks,</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Gaby</div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Oct 8, 2020, 9:05 PM
          lucilla fornaro, <<a
            href="mailto:lucillafornarosawamoto@gmail.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">lucillafornarosawamoto@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
          .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="ltr">Dear Sami, dear all,</div>
                <div dir="ltr"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="ltr">Most of the arguments supporting the
                  policy were not mere "opinions". </div>
                <div dir="ltr">A quick reminder, the policy reached a
                  rough consensus during the PPM and went to the last
                  call for some editorial changes. The authors, Taiwo
                  and Anthony, proved to be remarkably active to manage
                  minor issues and solicitudes from the community. The
                  resource transfer policy aims to build a stable and
                  efficient resources management system for the Afrinic
                  service region.</div>
                <div dir="ltr">The overall discussion has been full of
                  controversies undermining the work of the co-chairs,
                  an unfair behavior in my opinion.  Also, the arguments
                  against the policy have been strongly taken apart. </div>
                <div dir="ltr">We have been debating this policy for
                  weeks, it is now time to move it to the board for
                  ratification. </div>
                <div dir="ltr"><br>
                </div>
                <div>regards,</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Lucilla </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno gio 8 ott 2020
              alle ore 21:09 Sami Ait Ali Oulahcen via RPD <<a
                href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>>
              ha scritto:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
              <br>
              I can't see how the "Resource Transfer Policy" could have
              reached consensus.<br>
              I think the co-chairs' prerogative is to declare consensus
              on policies, <br>
              not general opinions. And "we need an inter-RIR transfer
              policy" is a <br>
              general opinion, not a policy.<br>
              The policy in question still had objections
              (non-editorial) before last <br>
              call. And it received significant changes during the last
              call period <br>
              (it is not what last call is meant for).<br>
              <br>
              Not that I have any interest in the policy itself being
              ratified or not. <br>
              It shouldn't be done this way.<br>
              <br>
              Just my 2c.<br>
              <br>
              Regards,<br>
              Sami<br>
              <br>
              On 10/8/20 12:30 AM, Moses Serugo wrote:<br>
              > Hello PDWG members,<br>
              > <br>
              > Following the last online PPM held on 16^th -17^th
              September 2020. Last <br>
              > call was announced on 21^st September 2020 for the
              following policy <br>
              > proposals.<br>
              > <br>
              >   * Board Prerogatives on the PDP<br>
              >   * Resource Transfer Policy<br>
              > <br>
              > This is to further announce that the  last call
              period for the above <br>
              > proposals has ended, based on feedback received from
              the community and <br>
              > the editorial changes made by authors to address
              community concerns, the <br>
              > consensus decision from AFRINIC32 is still
              maintained.<br>
              > <br>
              > Co-Chairs will now send a report to the Board
              recommending ratification <br>
              > of the two above proposals in line with CPM 3.0.<br>
              > <br>
              > Regards,<br>
              > <br>
              > Co-Chairs<br>
              > <br>
              > <br>
              > _______________________________________________<br>
              > RPD mailing list<br>
              > <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
              > <a
                href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
              > <br>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              RPD mailing list<br>
              <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
                rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
              <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
                rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          RPD mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
            rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
          <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>