<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica">Dear all,</p><p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica"><br></p><p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica"><br></p><p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica">RIPE indicates AFrinic the references and recommendations that it needs to manage legacy space; the current transfer policy does not mainly focus on it and I think it would be appropriate to discuss a different proposal to solve problems related to the legacy status.</p><p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica"><br></p><p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica">The <a href="https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/legacy-resources/ripe-ncc-services-to-legacy-internet-resource-holders">RIPE NCC</a> maintains and publishes registry data for resources held by members and legacy Internet resource holders and accommodates reverse DNS delegation and a routing registry for IP addresses and AS Numbers, including legacy Internet resources. These services are provided in respect of the relationship established with the holder of that resource. </p>
<p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica">There is already a contractual connection between the RIPE NCC and the Resource Holder. The Resource Holder can both decide to give back the resource to the appropriate free pool or to register it without legacy status as if it had been diffused by the RIPE NCC. </p>
<p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica;min-height:14px"><br></p>
<p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica">Regards,</p><p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica"><br></p><p style="margin:0px;font-stretch:normal;font-size:12px;line-height:normal;font-family:Helvetica">Lucilla</p></div></div></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno sab 26 set 2020 alle ore 11:22 Fernando Frediani <<a href="mailto:fhfrediani@gmail.com">fhfrediani@gmail.com</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>You are inverting the things, totally.</p>
<p>Legacy resources lose their legacy status IS the current rule and
it is like that in many other place and this is what was
originally on the proposal. Suddenly and without much explanation
it was changed in the very last minute after a PPM.<br>
Therefore it is a major issue and at least it should remain the
same and later discuss in another proposal if this should be
changed or not, not the other way round as is trying to be done
now without much justification as if it was a normal or secondary
thing.</p>
<p>Fernando<br>
</p>
<div>On 25/09/2020 22:22, Ibeanusi Elvis
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Dear community,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Concerning the legacy issues that was earlier
brought up, I believe its best to create a whole new proposal
dedicated to discussing and resolving the issues with legacy
status. With the “Legacy Status Policy”, we can have different
levels of services for legacy space holders which RIPE NCC does.
Also, as pointed out by Lucilla, there is no need or benefit to
be gained in forcing legacy space holders to loose their their
status and become a member. Moreover, this is not an operational
matter. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards,</div>
<div>Elvis</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Sep 26, 2020, at 09:50, lucilla fornaro
<<a href="mailto:lucillafornarosawamoto@gmail.com" target="_blank">lucillafornarosawamoto@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Dear Anthony,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I also support the idea of (if needed)
working on a different proposal to discuss and solve
problems related to the legacy status. </div>
<div>I see no benefit for Afrinic to force
legacy space holders to lose their status and become
a member, it is a simplistic and not efficient way
to manage a more articulate problem. In my opinion,
Afrinic should work on engaging with them, rather
than fight them.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Lucilla </div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno sab 26 set
2020 alle ore 07:18 Anthony Ubah <<a href="mailto:ubah.tonyiyke@gmail.com" target="_blank">ubah.tonyiyke@gmail.com</a>>
ha scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
<div>Hello Fenando,
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Are we throwing out the
bathing water together with the baby? Does
Legacy status impact on today's immediate
problem? </div>
<div dir="auto">Suggestion please.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Like I said, the Legacy
status of resources if not concluded here can be
discussed in a separate proposal. Opinions will
always be divided on certain issues.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Kind regards, </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Anthony Ubah </div>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Sep
25, 2020, 10:20 PM <<a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net" target="_blank">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Send
RPD mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd@afrinic.net</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:rpd-owner@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd-owner@afrinic.net</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line
so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: Decisions and summary on policy
proposals discussed<br>
during the online Policy meetin
(Fernando Frediani)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:19:55 -0300<br>
From: Fernando Frediani <<a href="mailto:fhfrediani@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">fhfrediani@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd@afrinic.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [rpd] Decisions and summary on
policy proposals discussed<br>
during the online Policy meetin<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:388bba0e-3230-f34a-5273-49595ef4a0fe@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">388bba0e-3230-f34a-5273-49595ef4a0fe@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8";
Format="flowed"<br>
<br>
On 25/09/2020 18:07, Anthony Ubah wrote:<br>
> <clip><br>
><br>
><br>
> With respect to my policy proposal on
Number resource Transfer, a <br>
> questions was asked about legacy
resources. This is relatively trivial <br>
> to the idea of the policy in general.
This can be subject to a new <br>
> Legacy policy in its own right. However
this proposal was done with <br>
> the grand intention of gaining
reciprocity with the key donor of IPv4s <br>
> which is ARIN. The issues raised
shouldn't halt this policy. Jordi <br>
> made some valid recommendations which can
be considered.<br>
<br>
It is definitively not. Letting them remain
considered legacy is a <br>
*major issue* that only benefit a few actors
who gain financially with <br>
it, plus incentives the continuation of a
historic internet issue that <br>
must end and bring all resources under common
rules that any other <br>
organization is bounded to on the top of
helping ending possible abuses <br>
from those who are still not subject to the
rules of any RIR.<br>
<br>
On the top of that this has never been
mentioned in *any* message for <br>
months of discussion and has never been raised
as an issue. Suddenly <br>
someone goes to the PPM, mentions that, it
becomes a mandatory change in <br>
order for the proposal to reach rough
consensus and the rest of the <br>
people who discussed it in details have no
chance oppose and properly <br>
put up their points ? It doesn't make sense !<br>
If the logic is that then people that have
financial means to attend a <br>
future event may be in advantage of others
that participate only in the <br>
RPD list if willing to change something
substantial in the proposal at <br>
the very last minute.<br>
<br>
FYI the Inter-RIR transfer policy in LACNIC
states any legacy resources <br>
transferred loses its status and it is still
reciprocal to any other RIR <br>
that have an Inter-RIR policy.<br>
<br>
Fernando<br>
<br>
><br>
> Lastly a comments was made about our
problem statement. I think it is <br>
> clearly stated. The use of the term
"Business" has raised a few <br>
> eyebrows and instigated ominous thoughts.
I urge everyone to read <br>
> again with an open mind. Internet is a
global enterprise, and Number <br>
> resources, internet, IT infrastructure
and business are an integral <br>
> part of our world today. It is
impractical to separate the use of <br>
> number resources from business.<br>
><br>
><br>
> These are my 10Cents.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Kind regards,<br>
><br>
> Anthony Ubah<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020, 5:03 PM <<a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a>
<br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a>>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> Send RPD mailing list submissions to<br>
> <a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd@afrinic.net</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd@afrinic.net</a>><br>
><br>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
World Wide Web, visit<br>
> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>><br>
> or, via email, send a message with
subject or body 'help' to<br>
> <a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd-request@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd-request@afrinic.net</a>><br>
><br>
> You can reach the person managing the
list at<br>
> <a href="mailto:rpd-owner@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd-owner@afrinic.net</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd-owner@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd-owner@afrinic.net</a>><br>
><br>
> When replying, please edit your
Subject line so it is more specific<br>
> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."<br>
><br>
><br>
> Today's Topics:<br>
><br>
> ? ?1. Re: Decisions and summary on
policy proposals discussed<br>
> ? ? ? during the online Policy
meeting (AFRINIC 32) (Blaise Fyama)<br>
><br>
><br>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 1<br>
> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 18:02:20 +0200<br>
> From: Blaise Fyama <<a href="mailto:bfyama@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">bfyama@gmail.com</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:bfyama@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">bfyama@gmail.com</a>>><br>
> To: ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE <<a href="mailto:oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng</a>>><br>
> Cc: rpd List <<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd@afrinic.net</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">rpd@afrinic.net</a>>><br>
> Subject: Re: [rpd] Decisions and
summary on policy proposals discussed<br>
> ? ? ? ? during the online Policy
meeting (AFRINIC 32)<br>
> Message-ID:<br>
> ? ? ? ?<br>
> <CAPehF5dv=<a href="mailto:5yc_bHR6OEJwtr7V28qNhTk-tK-sf1C_eAxWGLmVQ@mail.gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">5yc_bHR6OEJwtr7V28qNhTk-tK-sf1C_eAxWGLmVQ@mail.gmail.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:5yc_bHR6OEJwtr7V28qNhTk-tK-sf1C_eAxWGLmVQ@mail.gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">5yc_bHR6OEJwtr7V28qNhTk-tK-sf1C_eAxWGLmVQ@mail.gmail.com</a>>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"<br>
><br>
> Chers co-chairs,<br>
> Sans ?tre virulents ? votre ?gard
j'ai juste deux remarques ?<br>
> faire d'abord:<br>
><br>
> 1. L'aspect multilinguiste devrait
?tre respect? dans la prise en<br>
> compte de<br>
> vos d?cisions, et je n'en ai pas le
sentiment, ce qui implique que<br>
> pour<br>
> accompagner solidement vos
conclusions et vos inf?rences, un tableau<br>
> transparent regroupant sommairement
les r?actions de chaque membre<br>
> politique apr?s politique serait le
bienvenu car il permettrait ?<br>
> tout le<br>
> monde d'avoir une vue claire et
optimale de vos d?cisions.<br>
> ?tant un acad?mique de carri?re, je
constate que sur 10 politiques<br>
> seulement 2 sont adopt?es ou en voie
de l'?tre ce qui laisse<br>
> sous-entendre<br>
> que les 8 autres politiques, qui
pourtant r?sultent de grands efforts,<br>
> donnent un sentiment d'?chec ? leurs
auteurs. Pourriez-vous<br>
> ?couter un peu<br>
> plus leurs auteurs?<br>
> Je reconnais par exemple que Jordi a
longuement interagis et<br>
> ?chang? avec<br>
> plusieurs d'entre nous sa proposition
m?riterait d'?voluer.<br>
><br>
> 2. Lorsqu'une remarque techniquement
et valablement soutenue vous est<br>
> adress?e pourriez-vous aussi donner
des explications<br>
> proportionnellement longues? Vos
r?ponses courtes et laconiques<br>
> laissent un<br>
> sentiment de manque de consid?ration
de ce qui vous est adress?<br>
> par les<br>
> membres. Sinon vous risquez
d'inspirer ? leur tour les membres du<br>
> PDWG que<br>
> nous sommes ? concevoir des
politiques qui limitent votre propre r?le.<br>
><br>
> La note positive dans tout ?a est que
les 2 politiques ? savoir<br>
> les "Les<br>
> pr?rogatives du conseil" et
"Politique de transfert des<br>
> ressources" au vu<br>
> des longues discussions pendant des
mois ont quand m?me fait du<br>
> chemin. Je<br>
> note seulement que nous devons rester
alerte pour? "Les<br>
> pr?rogatives du<br>
> conseil"? afin de ne pas affaiblir
non plus le conseil qui devrait<br>
> demeurer<br>
> un organe de prise des d?cisions,
pour plus d'efficience et<br>
> d'efficacit?<br>
> dans le fonctionnement de la
communaut?.<br>
> J'en f?licite les auteurs, surtout
Taiwo avec qui j'ai eu<br>
> l'opportunit?<br>
> d'?changer lors de l'avant-dernier
sommet en Angola.<br>
><br>
> Pour finir chers co-chairs
efforcez-vous d'?tre multilingues pour nous<br>
> ?crire en Fran?ais comme nous aussi
on vous ?crit parfois en Anglais.<br>
><br>
> Cordialement,<br>
> Blaise.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Blaise FYAMA<br>
> Msc, PhD.<br>
> Professeur Associ?<br>
> Secr?taire G?n?ral Acad?mique
Honoraire/UL<br>
> Doyen de la Facult? des Sciences
Informatiques/UPL<br>
> Doyen a.i de la Facult?
Polytechnique/UPL<br>
> Chef de D?partement G?nie
Electrique/ESI-UNILU<br>
> Chef de Service
Informatique/Polytech-UNILU<br>
> Consultant Informatique BIT/PAEJK<br>
> Membre de International Research
Conference IRC/WASET<br>
> Tel: +243995579515<br>
> Num?ro O.N.I.CIV: 00460<br>
><br>
> MSc, PhD.<br>
><br>
> Associate Professor<br>
><br>
> Honorary Academic Secretary General /
UL<br>
><br>
> Dean of the Faculty of Computer
Science / UPL<br>
><br>
> Dean a.i of the Polytechnic Faculty /
UPL<br>
><br>
> Head of Department of Electrical
Engineering / ESI-UNILU<br>
><br>
> IT Service Manager / Polytech-UNILU<br>
><br>
> IT Consultant BIT / PAEJK<br>
><br>
> Member of International Research
Conference IRC/WASET<br>
><br>
> Phone: +243995579515<br>
><br>
> O.N.I.CIV number: 00460<br>
><br>
><br>
> Le lun. 21 sept. 2020 ? 02:06,
ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE <<br>
> <a href="mailto:oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">oloyede.aa@unilorin.edu.ng</a>>>
a<br>
> ?crit :<br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > Dear PDWG Members,<br>
> ><br>
> >? Please find below a summary for
each of the proposal discussed<br>
> during the<br>
> > just concluded online policy
meeting of AFRINIC 32<br>
> ><br>
> > 1.? ? ? ?Simple PDP Update<br>
> ><br>
> > This policy defines consensus.
It also proposes that a policy<br>
> discussed at<br>
> > the PPM does not need to come
back for another PPM for the<br>
> Co-chairs to<br>
> > arrive at a decision. This can
help in streamlining the work<br>
> during the PPM<br>
> > and encourages people to use the
mailing list.<br>
> ><br>
> > There were lots of irrelevant
objections on the mailing list such as<br>
> > someone registering many emails.
We believe that this does not<br>
> matter<br>
> > because rough consensus is not
about numbers but quality objections.<br>
> ><br>
> > However, there is strong
opposition to this policy based on the<br>
> following:<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Oppose the
policy because of the way the<br>
> consensus<br>
> > is reached. This proposal
proposes that the consensus be reached<br>
> through a<br>
> > balance of the mailing
list/forum and not at the PPM. This<br>
> endangers fair<br>
> > consensus and hijacks the
policymaking process. Based on<br>
> experience, it is<br>
> > during the PPM that most
community members focus on policies.<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Issues
around how the chairs should drop<br>
> proposals.<br>
> ><br>
> > c.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Trust in
the mailing list: Some strongly<br>
> believe<br>
> > that anonymous contribution
should be allowed while some<br>
> believes it should<br>
> > not.<br>
> ><br>
> > d.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Issues
around having more than 1 PPM per<br>
> year and<br>
> > Online PPM because of volunteer
burnout. We are all volunteers<br>
> and it?s a<br>
> > night job for us. More PPMs mean
more time to volunteer and more<br>
> chances<br>
> > for burnouts<br>
> ><br>
> > e.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Some members
of the Community thinks only<br>
> burning or<br>
> > polarizing issues should be
brought to the PPM.<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision:? ?No Consensus<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 2.? ? ? ?PDP Working Group<br>
> ><br>
> > This proposal aims at allowing
most of the decisions including chair<br>
> > elections to be determined via
consensus.? This can be<br>
> reasonable when the<br>
> > community has the same goal.
However, there were a number of<br>
> objections to<br>
> > it. These are:<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Entrusting
the WG to make their decisions by<br>
> > consensus and the appointment of
their co-chairs by consensus do<br>
> not make<br>
> > sense and is only utopic.<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? People are
not policy proposals, and thus<br>
> choosing by<br>
> > consensus is splitting hairs
with the election process we<br>
> already have.<br>
> > Save the consensus for the
proposals, and the election for people.<br>
> ><br>
> > c.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Consensus
may even take months, and this<br>
> can?t fly<br>
> > when we want to put people in
the vacant roles.<br>
> ><br>
> > d.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Co-chairs
should not have a hand in the<br>
> consensus,<br>
> > but only sit back and let the
community decide for themselves.<br>
> > Additionally, the consensus
process is not feasible with a deadline.<br>
> ><br>
> > e.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Focus on
polishing the current electoral process<br>
> > instead of complicating other
untested forms of ?election?.<br>
> ><br>
> > f.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The
current status quo?s election should<br>
> be the<br>
> > only option in choosing for the
roles, and not through less<br>
> transparent<br>
> > means.<br>
> ><br>
> > g.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Board would
be interfering too much on<br>
> issues that<br>
> > deal with PDP<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision:? ? No Consensus<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 3.? ? ? ?Chairs Election Process<br>
> ><br>
> > This proposal aims at
introducing an online voting system for the<br>
> > Co-Chairs election. The
following are the opposition to this<br>
> proposal.<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?This policy
reduces participation. Equal<br>
> > representation is violated
because the board has unprecedented<br>
> power.<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? There is
also not enough information on the<br>
> logistics<br>
> > of the vote (e-voting).<br>
> ><br>
> > c.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?There is a
contradiction on when the term ends<br>
> > during the meeting. ?The term
ends during the first PPM<br>
> corresponding to<br>
> > the end of the term for which
they were appointed? is not clear<br>
> enough, and<br>
> > ?A term may begin or end no
sooner than the first day of the PPM<br>
> and no<br>
> > later than the last day of the
PPM as determined by mutual<br>
> agreement of the<br>
> > current Chair and the new Chair?
contradicts each other.<br>
> ><br>
> > d.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Gender
restriction on 3.3.1.3 , some community<br>
> > members argue it is impractical
and maybe even unfair if we<br>
> force both<br>
> > chairs to have different
genders.<br>
> ><br>
> > e.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Issues
around which voter's register should be<br>
> > adopted<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision: No Consensus<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 4.? ? ? ?Board Prerogatives<br>
> ><br>
> > This proposal aims at clarifying
how the board and the PDWG? works.<br>
> > However, there were a few
oppositions to this proposal except for a<br>
> > specific section.<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?It seems
like a piecemeal approach to<br>
> dealing with<br>
> > issues.<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Opposition
to the section below<br>
> ><br>
> > *?As an exception of the
preceding paragraph, in the absence of<br>
> elections<br>
> > processes for aspects related to
the PDP (co-chairs, appeal<br>
> committee),<br>
> > those aspects will be still
handled by the board in consultation<br>
> with the<br>
> > community. However, this is also
a temporary measure and also<br>
> specific<br>
> > draft policy proposals should be
introduced for that*?. The authors<br>
> > agreed to remove the above
section hence<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision: Consensus
provided the above section is removed<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 5.? ? ? ?Policy Compliance
Dashboard<br>
> ><br>
> > The policy proposal seeks to
provide a framework or a policy<br>
> compliance<br>
> > dashboard be developed by
AFRINIC and incorporated in myAFRINIC<br>
> (and future<br>
> > member?s communication
platforms).? It will allow a periodic<br>
> review of the<br>
> > policy compliance status of each
member. It will also enable<br>
> members to<br>
> > receive automated notifications
for any issue. Staff will<br>
> receive repeated<br>
> > warnings of lack of compliance
or severe violations enshrined in<br>
> the CPM.<br>
> > However, there are several
oppositions to this proposal, such as:<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?This policy
seems to be redundant of the<br>
> status quo<br>
> > as violations are already
checked and processed by the human staff.<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? There is
already an existing system of<br>
> guidelines on<br>
> > keeping track of the violations
of members.<br>
> ><br>
> > c.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?The policy
is not binding and does not enforce<br>
> > members actually to follow the
rules and not violate policies.<br>
> ><br>
> > d.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Ignorance
could be a convenient excuse for<br>
> violations<br>
> > because one could claim that
they never got notified about their<br>
> violations.<br>
> ><br>
> > e.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? There is no
comprehensive system on how the<br>
> board<br>
> > should take proper actions once
members violate policies, nor<br>
> does it give<br>
> > guidelines based on the severity
of the violations.<br>
> ><br>
> > f.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? This
policy takes away resources that<br>
> could be used<br>
> > for more beneficial pursuits to
AFRINIC for something existing<br>
> in the<br>
> > system.<br>
> ><br>
> > g.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?It an
administrative? process, and this<br>
> should be<br>
> > left to staff<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision:? NO rough
Consensus<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 6.? ? ? ?Abuse Contact Update<br>
> ><br>
> > The proposal makes it mandatory
for AFRINIC to include in each<br>
> resource<br>
> > registration, a contact where
network abuse from users of those<br>
> resources<br>
> > will be reported.? The proposal
whois DB attribute (abuse-c) to<br>
> be used to<br>
> > publish abuse public contact
information. There?s also a process<br>
> to ensure<br>
> > that the recipient must receive
abuse report and that contacts are<br>
> > validated by AFRINIC regularly.
However, there some opposition<br>
> to the<br>
> > proposal there are:<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Staff
analysis on how it affects legacy<br>
> holder not<br>
> > conclusive? (not sure why this
should affect legacy holders)<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The proposal
doesn?t state what will be the<br>
> > consequences of one member fails
to comply. Why are we creating<br>
> the abuse<br>
> > contact when there is no
consequence for not providing the abuse<br>
> contact<br>
> ><br>
> > c.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Abuse
contact email and issues with GDPR<br>
> concerning<br>
> > the whois database<br>
> ><br>
> > d.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No proper
definition of the term Abuse<br>
> ><br>
> > e.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? To force
members to reply to their abuse<br>
> email is not<br>
> > in the scope of AFRINIC.<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision: No rough
consensus<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 7.? ? ? ?RPKI ROAs for
Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC<br>
> Address Space<br>
> ><br>
> > The proposal instructs AFRINIC
to create ROAs for all<br>
> unallocated and<br>
> > unassigned address space under
its control. This will enable<br>
> networks<br>
> > performing RPKI-based BGP Origin
Validation to easily reject all<br>
> the bogon<br>
> > announcements covering resources
managed by AFRINIC. However,<br>
> there are<br>
> > many oppositions such as:<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Allowing
resource holders to create AS0/<br>
> ROA will<br>
> > lead to an increase of even more
invalid prefixes in the routing<br>
> table.<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Revocation
time of AS0 state, and the time<br>
> for new<br>
> > allocation doesn?t match.<br>
> ><br>
> > c.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Other RIRs
don?t have a similar the policy<br>
> > therefore, it can not be
effective<br>
> ><br>
> > d.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? This will
become a uniform policy if it is not<br>
> > globally implemented, which
causes additional stress.<br>
> ><br>
> > e.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Validity
period:? ?if members decide to<br>
> implement it,<br>
> > is it not better to recover the
space if it is kept unused for<br>
> too long?<br>
> ><br>
> > f.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? How do we
revoke the ROA? How long does it<br>
> take to<br>
> > revoke it (chain/ refreshing )?<br>
> ><br>
> > g.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?What
happens if AFRINIC accidentally issues<br>
> a ROA<br>
> > for an address in error?<br>
> ><br>
> > h.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? It also
might affect the neighbours and involves<br>
> > monitoring of unallocated
spaces.<br>
> ><br>
> > i.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
?Possibility of it being used against a<br>
> member who<br>
> > is yet to pay dues.<br>
> ><br>
> > Suggestions were made to improve
the policy such as<br>
> ><br>
> > a)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The
automatic creation of AS0 ROAs should be<br>
> limited<br>
> > to space that has never been
allocated by an RIR or part of a legacy<br>
> > allocation.<br>
> ><br>
> > b)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? AFRINIC
should require the explicit consent<br>
> of the<br>
> > previous holder to issue AS0
ROAs in respect of re-claimed,<br>
> returned, etc,<br>
> > space.<br>
> ><br>
> > c)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Any ROAs
issued under this policy should be<br>
> issued<br>
> > and published in a way that
makes it operationally easy for a<br>
> relying party<br>
> > to ignore them (probably by
issuing under a separate TA).<br>
> ><br>
> > d)? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The proposal
should include the clause ?as<br>
> used in<br>
> > APNIC as to dues not paid on
time.?<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision: No consensus<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 8.? ? ? ?IPv4 Inter-RIR Resource
Transfers (Comprehensive Scope)<br>
> ><br>
> > The proposal puts in place a
mechanism to transfer IPv4 and<br>
> (some ASN)<br>
> > resources between AFRINIC and
other RIRs and between AFRINIC<br>
> > members/entities. Some
conditions are attached to the source and<br>
> recipient<br>
> > based on need and disclosure
made. The inter-RIR transfers will be<br>
> > suspended if the number of
outgoing IPv4 addresses exceeds the<br>
> incoming<br>
> > ones for six consecutive months.
However, there are oppositions<br>
> to it<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ASN
Transfer is not necessary<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Issue of
board inferring: no board in all of<br>
> the five<br>
> > RIRs have ever been involved in
deciding a transfer or allocating IP<br>
> > address. It is not the board's
responsibility.<br>
> ><br>
> > c.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Suspending
clause with no reinstalling<br>
> clause. This<br>
> > mainly makes the policy
potentially invalid.<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision: No consensus.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 9.? ? ? ?AFRINIC Number Resource
Transfer<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Not
realistic for one-way inter RIR resource<br>
> > transfer as it has to be
reciprocal. One way would never happen<br>
> as only<br>
> > global resources can come in and
go out<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? It would be
difficult for the recipient to<br>
> follow the<br>
> > rules of AFRINIC if they are not
in the African region.<br>
> ><br>
> > c.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?No need for
ASN transfer. If one is moving<br>
> regions<br>
> > and doesn't have an ASN in the
new region, it can request and<br>
> receive from<br>
> > the local RIRs<br>
> ><br>
> > d.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Additional
attributes create none-operational<br>
> > complexity in the whois
database.<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision: No consensus.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > 10.? ?Resource Transfer Policy<br>
> ><br>
> > This proposal aims to introduce
Inter RIR transfer. However, it<br>
> has the<br>
> > following opposition<br>
> ><br>
> > a.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Issues with
Legacy holder transfer is<br>
> potentially<br>
> > considered none-reciprocal by
ARIN<br>
> ><br>
> > b.? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Potential
abuse of AFRINIC free pool without<br>
> the time<br>
> > limit of receiving an allocation
from AFRINIC.<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision: The proposal is
the least contested of all the 3<br>
> > competing proposals. However
because of the community?s desire<br>
> and clear<br>
> > expression for the? need for an
Inter RIR transfer, we, the<br>
> Co-chairs,<br>
> > believe that in the interest of
the community we should focus on<br>
> a proposal<br>
> > rather than several similar
ones. This desire was clearly<br>
> expressed at the<br>
> > AFRINIC 31 meeting in Angola.
Therefore, We suggest that the<br>
> authors of<br>
> > this proposal make the following
amendments:<br>
> ><br>
> > ?? ? ? ? ?5.7.3.2? Source
entities are not eligible to receive<br>
> further<br>
> > IPv4 allocations or assignments
from AFRINIC for 12 months<br>
> period after the<br>
> > transfer.<br>
> ><br>
> > ?? ? ? ? ?5.7.4.3. Transferred
legacy resources will still be<br>
> regarded as<br>
> > legacy resources.<br>
> ><br>
> > Chairs Decision: Provided that
the above are amended, the<br>
> decisions is<br>
> > Rough Consensus is achieved<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > Based on the above, The updated
version of the follow proposal which<br>
> > achieved rough consensus would
be posted on the PDWG website<br>
> ><br>
> > *1.? ? ? ?**Board Prerogatives *<br>
> ><br>
> > *2.? ? ? ?**Resource Transfer
Policy*<br>
> ><br>
> > Therefore, these two policies
are now on last call.<br>
> ><br>
> > Co-Chair<br>
> > PDWG<br>
> ><br>
> > Website <<a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.unilorin.edu.ng</a><br>
> <<a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.unilorin.edu.ng</a>>>,
Weekly Bulletin<br>
> > <<a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin</a><br>
> <<a href="http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin</a>>>
UGPortal<br>
> > <<a href="http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/</a><br>
> <<a href="http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/</a>>>
PGPortal<br>
> > <<a href="https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/</a><br>
> <<a href="https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/</a>>><br>
> ><br>
> >
_______________________________________________<br>
> > RPD mailing list<br>
> > <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
> > <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>><br>
> ><br>
> -------------- next part
--------------<br>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
> URL:<br>
> <<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200925/a8a5d980/attachment.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200925/a8a5d980/attachment.html</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200925/a8a5d980/attachment.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200925/a8a5d980/attachment.html</a>>><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Subject: Digest Footer<br>
><br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
> RPD mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a>><br>
> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
> <<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> End of RPD Digest, Vol 168, Issue 213<br>
> *************************************<br>
><br>
><br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
> RPD mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200925/1e6effea/attachment.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200925/1e6effea/attachment.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of RPD Digest, Vol 168, Issue 219<br>
*************************************<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</blockquote></div>