<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/09/2020 05:05, Beatrix Kispal
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMSdyuLvhumoVyn8Vmq+Oo7MSQo-+i1ujHsmVf9ypXvXrwbKZw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><clip></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMSdyuLvhumoVyn8Vmq+Oo7MSQo-+i1ujHsmVf9ypXvXrwbKZw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><span></span>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
0.0001pt;font-size:medium;font-family:Cambria;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Furthermore,
constantly following the mailing list, reading every entry
is extremely time consuming, it requires so much effort and
resources therefore would strongly support to sticking to
the old normal and keeping the Policy Development Process on
its own designated day, when all present participants are
present and fully dedicated.</p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
If one doesn't have time to read all emails and discussions then
that person may not have time to participate and that's a personal
choice. When I decide to participate on any forum I put time aside
to be able to properly participate on whatever discussions I find
important.<br>
The process is opened and whoever wishes may participate. The most
important discussions happen on the email list, not on a one-day
event.<br>
<p>A one day event may have the potential to be easily manipulated
by someone who have economic interest and be able to pay for
people to be in the meeting just for an very specific reason and
never more appear in the PDP.</p>
<p>Fernando<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMSdyuLvhumoVyn8Vmq+Oo7MSQo-+i1ujHsmVf9ypXvXrwbKZw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
0.0001pt;font-size:medium;font-family:Cambria;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
0.0001pt;font-size:medium;font-family:Cambria;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
0.0001pt;font-size:medium;font-family:Cambria;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm
0.0001pt;font-size:medium;font-family:Cambria;color:rgb(0,0,0)">Best
wishes,<br>
Beatrix <span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 09:22,
Cathie Jay <<a href="mailto:cathie.kay89@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">cathie.kay89@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Dear
Jordi, dear community,<br>
<br>
I oppose this policy because of the way in which consensus is
reached.<br>
The current policy stipulates that consensus should be reached
through<br>
the balancing of the mailing list and forum, and not during
the PPM.<br>
Such policy could pave the way for the intrusion of fake
emails within<br>
the discussion, which could endanger the process of reaching a
fair<br>
consensus, and jeopardize the process of policy-making. In
addition,<br>
it would significantly undermine the work of the co-chairs who
will<br>
facilitate the discussion.<br>
<br>
All best wishes,<br>
<br>
Cathie<br>
<br>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD<br>
<<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">rpd@afrinic.net</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi Chloe,<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Exactly! I just responded to that to Gaby.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Tks!<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
><br>
> Jordi<br>
><br>
> @jordipalet<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> El 9/9/20 13:00, "Chloe Kung" <<a
href="mailto:chloe.kung.public@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">chloe.kung.public@gmail.com</a>>
escribió:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I actually think section 3.4.3 is adequate as the
discussion period of each policy proposal is a good 8 weeks.
If there is no major objection based on technical
justification submitted during the 8 weeks, the chance of
having one during the last call period is very small. Even so,
the community still have more time than needed to address and
discuss the matter. Also this section states and I quote
"Within 1 week after the end of the last call, the Working
Group Chairs shall confirm whether consensus is maintained.”
So if there is such case, meaning the consensus cannot be
maintained, it will fall back into the discussion period
anyway.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
><br>
> Chloe<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________ RPD
mailing list <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a> <a
href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> **********************************************<br>
> IPv4 is over<br>
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
> <a href="http://www.theipv6company.com" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>
> The IPv6 Company<br>
><br>
> This electronic message contains information which may be
privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be
for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and
further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even
if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited
and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this information, even
if partially, including attached files, is strictly
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must
reply to the original sender to inform about this
communication and delete it.<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> RPD mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
RPD mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>