<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \(Cuerpo en alfa";
panose-1:2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Cambria;
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Texto sin formato Car";
margin:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
span.EstiloCorreo18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.TextosinformatoCar
{mso-style-name:"Texto sin formato Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Texto sin formato";
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=ES link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>As said, this is the current practice! The chairs can confirm that.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>We aren't changing this, just making sure that it is explicit in the PDP.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>Jordi<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoPlainText><span lang=EN-US>@jordipalet<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'>El 16/9/20 10:06, "Beatrix Kispal" <<a href="mailto:kispal.beatrix01@gmail.com">kispal.beatrix01@gmail.com</a>> escribió:<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif;color:black'>As proposed under 3.3. (The Policy Development Working Group): "The Policy Development Working Group (PDWG) discusses the proposals. Anyone may participate via the Internet or in person. PDWG work is carried out through the Resource Policy Discussion (RPD) mailing list (</span><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif'>rpd@afrinic.net<span style='color:black'>) and the AFRINIC Public Policy Meetings (PPM). Any person, participating either in person or remotely, is considered to be part of the PDWG."<o:p></o:p></span></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif;color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif;color:black'>At the case of ‘anyone’ participating via the Internet, there is no plausible way to filter out potentially fake email addresses, therefore the votes can be easily manipulated and therefore reaching an unfair consensus.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif;color:black'>Furthermore, constantly following the mailing list, reading every entry is extremely time consuming, it requires so much effort and resources therefore would strongly support to sticking to the old normal and keeping the Policy Development Process on its own designated day, when all present participants are present and fully dedicated.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif;color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif;color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Cambria",serif;color:black'>Best wishes,<br>Beatrix <o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'>On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 09:22, Cathie Jay <<a href="mailto:cathie.kay89@gmail.com">cathie.kay89@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.4pt'>Dear Jordi, dear community,<br><br>I oppose this policy because of the way in which consensus is reached.<br>The current policy stipulates that consensus should be reached through<br>the balancing of the mailing list and forum, and not during the PPM.<br>Such policy could pave the way for the intrusion of fake emails within<br>the discussion, which could endanger the process of reaching a fair<br>consensus, and jeopardize the process of policy-making. In addition,<br>it would significantly undermine the work of the co-chairs who will<br>facilitate the discussion.<br><br>All best wishes,<br><br>Cathie<br><br>On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD<br><<a href="mailto:rpd@afrinic.net" target="_blank">rpd@afrinic.net</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> Hi Chloe,<br>><br>><br>><br>> Exactly! I just responded to that to Gaby.<br>><br>><br>><br>> Tks!<br>><br>><br>><br>> Regards,<br>><br>> Jordi<br>><br>> @jordipalet<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> El 9/9/20 13:00, "Chloe Kung" <<a href="mailto:chloe.kung.public@gmail.com" target="_blank">chloe.kung.public@gmail.com</a>> escribió:<br>><br>><br>><br>> Hi,<br>><br>><br>><br>> I actually think section 3.4.3 is adequate as the discussion period of each policy proposal is a good 8 weeks. If there is no major objection based on technical justification submitted during the 8 weeks, the chance of having one during the last call period is very small. Even so, the community still have more time than needed to address and discuss the matter. Also this section states and I quote "Within 1 week after the end of the last call, the Working Group Chairs shall confirm whether consensus is maintained.” So if there is such case, meaning the consensus cannot be maintained, it will fall back into the discussion period anyway.<br>><br>><br>><br>> Best,<br>><br>> Chloe<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br>><br>><br>> **********************************************<br>> IPv4 is over<br>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>> <a href="http://www.theipv6company.com" target="_blank">http://www.theipv6company.com</a><br>> The IPv6 Company<br>><br>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> RPD mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br>> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>RPD mailing list<br><a href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net" target="_blank">RPD@afrinic.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div><br>**********************************************<br>
IPv4 is over<br>
Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
http://www.theipv6company.com<br>
The IPv6 Company<br>
<br>
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br>
<br>
</body></html>